EQNEEDF - Energy Quest National Energy Efficient Development Founder

US Aircraft Carrier history reports presently available do not disclose all deployment history of each carrier’s deployment. On my web site you can review my references and my carrier summary reports illustrate at www.uscarrierhistory.com what history is presently reported about US Aircraft Carrier deployments.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Do We Need to Stay In Iraq?

Do We Need to Stay In Iraq?
http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=10141&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

While Americans are thinking about Do We Need to Stay In Iraq, are they researching and investigating any of their assumptions through the world wide net? I know many Americans who don’t have computers, don’t surf the net, listen to the radio rather then news on countless cable stations and networks, chat on forums, read blogs, local and national newspapers, magazines and some so fed up they refuse to stay informed but have a bunch of opinions, the American people.

If I’m not mistaken and I have been on occasion, the United Nations tied the U. S. hands with a clear mandate to defend Kuwait but leave that starving craved nut in power during our first Bush President during Operation Desert Shield/Storm. His son, our present President feared that Iraq had enriched uranium or at least the capacity to make it and that there critter, defiant before the United Nations, refused to allow proper inspections of its nuclear technologies and while he was a mass murderer, violated human rights, the latter was of no clear threat to the U. S. while his ambiguous nuclear technology program was.

Therefore, Iran’s ambiguous nuclear technology program today, threatening the State of Israel with total destruction of there race and death to Americans, disrupting world order, peace and stability by pressuring countries to go along with their program and Iran’s refusal to stop their quest for enriched uranium clearly poses a greater threat then that there starving critter, the former President of Iraq and soon to be dead human rights violator.

Clark: Hanging Saddam Would Cause Chaos - Thursday, October 5, 2006 (AP) - Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, a member of Saddam Hussein's defense team, predicted on Thursday that a bloodbath would follow should an Iraqi court trying the former president have him executed.

At a news conference, Clark said he feared that should Saddam and the others be hanged, "catastrophic violence" would follow that would lead to "the end of civilization as we know it in the birthplace of civilization, Mesopotamia. Total, unmitigated chaos."

Saddam's Sunni Muslim tribe of 1.5 million would be enraged over what they would consider the revenge killing of the former president by the Shiite-controlled and U.S.-sponsored government, Clark said.

Clark, 78, was attorney general under President Johnson despite opposing the Vietnam War and has been best known since for defending people with unpopular causes. Besides Saddam, he has worked with blind Egyptian cleric Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, a planner of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and American Indian activist Leonard Peltier, convicted in a 1975 gunfight at the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in which two FBI agents died.

Saddam and the other defendants, who include his vice president, Taha Yassin Ramadan, are being tried for genocide in the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi Kurds during the late 1980s. They already have been tried for murder and torture in the deaths of 148 Iraqi Shiites from the Iraqi town of Dujail who allegedly conspired to kill Saddam in 1981.

The court that tried them was to have returned its verdict on Oct. 16, but it announced this week it will not do so. A new date was not set.

Clark said the defendants are at Camp Cropper near Baghdad's airport in a new $60 million detention center. The Army says it oversees about 13,000 prisoners in Iraq at Cropper, Camp Bucca in the southern desert and Fort

Suse in the Kurdish north.

The United States has said it transferred Saddam to Iraqi custody some time ago, but his whereabouts have not been divulged.

In March, an AP-Ipsos poll in the United States and several other countries found that two out of three Americans felt Saddam was getting a fair trial and if convicted should be executed. Lesser majorities in eight other countries polled said he was being tried fairly and should be jailed for life if convicted."

Iranian president says his country is determined to expand uranium http://www.fox6.com/news/world/story.aspx?content_id=4B8D4591-BC9B-428 1-8A77-3647E23D4E35

Iran Daily

Pistachiov Production Down 12 State Firms to Offer Shares Majlis Concerned About Low Foreign Investment - This is why Iran passed the foreign investment bill in 2005 Petrochem Complex Against Privatization Fruit Market in Crisis IDB Loans for 3 Companies E. Azarbaijan, Italy Review Cooperation Pak Lawmaker Supports Gas Pipeline Project Armenia Will Sell Electricity to Iran http://www.iran-daily.com/1383/2100/html/economy.htm

Oil bourse not to use euros in Iran: TSM chief Wednesday, September 07, 2005
http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=35269&N ewsKind=Current%20Affairs

Iran arbitration body approves foreign loans Monday, November 14, 2005
http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=37706&N ewsKind=CurrentAffairs

Iran, Armenia, Georgia sign MoU on supply of electricity Sep 30, 2006
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_18005.shtml

Iran to abandon deal with Japan Sep 30, 2006
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_18004.shtml

THE ASAHI SHIMBUN
Japan officials: Iran oil field talks still alive 10/06/2006 http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200610060150.html

Oct. 6, 2006, 11:23AM Japan Cutting Stake in Iran Oil Project By HIROKO TABUCHI Associated Press Writer
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4240924.html

TOKYO (AFP)
Japan braces to lose part of Iranian oil mega-project 10-06-2006, 04h57 http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=145304

AFP
Japan to lose most of Iranian oil mega-project 6 October 2006
http://cpa-iraq.org/pressreleases/index.html

As far as the Civil War theory, is it real or is it a myth? Clearly there are those who desire to rule in the presence of Iraq’s present democracy, which by the way has evolved into more freedoms then they had while the Baptist regime was in power and given time will most likely see greater freedoms of worship and civil liberties, liberties that are presently in place, yet many fear the bullies and assembly often results in terrorist attacks killing hundreds, thereby making it appear sometimes there are limited civil liberties when in reality there are, because thousands aren’t rallying and protesting or desecrating the dear departed at funeral ceremonies like Americans in our country are free to do.

Clearly if Iran partners with Iraq, all hopes of democracy would soon be squelched unless Iran recognizes Iraq’s sovereign right to become a democracy and while the Iraq’s President through his Foreign Minister recently sought out Iran’s assistance with security of his nation, full well knowing Iran is backing and funding insurgents within Iraq, illustrates that without the U. S. assistance until Iraq can stand on its own, will merely invite Iran to become even a greater influence in the affairs of Iraq. The Iraq and Iran 8 ½ year war plays a large role in the way the Iranians view the Iraq people and vises a versa.

Iran is clearly the largest threat facing world order and peace and the international community will once and for all have to deal with Iran’s defiance to Middle East stability.

Apologize for being in Iraq, when the country is so close to ultimate victory provided Iran is dealt with severally is ludicrous and to do so would dishonor those sacrificing their lives in the struggle against terror or fascism or both, dependant upon your point of view.

Who's to say it's not WWII all over gain. They learned there tactics from the Hitler party and they want to kill Jews, and dominate the world.

If the U. S. doesn’t have the resolve to kick Iran’s ass back to the stone ages where they presently are dwelling ideologically, then strengthening Iraq’s boarders preventing further insurgents, arms and funds from Iran is only prudent, yet if Iraq joins up with Iran in international quarters and inner city and regional security, then clearly we must rethink what were trying to accomplish.

I'm for fighting, not loosing, but Iran must be dealt with if were to win.

Iran has vowed to help Iraq with their security what ever that means.

When you kill a snake, you don't cut the tail off.

Where is the boarder navy flights making sure arms from Iran don't make it to Iraq?

Fight this dam war with all thy might or bring our troops home and protect the boarders of the U. S.

Clean out that city if you have to evacuate everyone house by house.

Get the job done.

Baghdad locked down, U.S. military suspect Sunni politician's guard http://www.fox6.com/news/world/story.aspx?content_id=3BBAC340-A031-489

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - A nervous normality returned to Iraq's capital on Sunday after a 24-hour curfew imposed after U.S. troops arrested a top politician's bodyguard suspected of a plot to bomb the heavily fortified government compound. http://www.topix.net/content/reuters/235681517238241545853986672556030

Army Warns Rumsfeld It's Billions Short An extraordinary action by the chief of staff sends a message: The Pentagon must increase the budget or reduce commitments in Iraq and elsewhere.

By Peter Spiegel, Times Staff Writer September 25, 2006

About $400 billion has been appropriated for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars through emergency funding measures since Sept. 11, 2001, with the money divided among military branches and government agencies.

According to a senior Army official involved in budget talks, Schoomaker is now seeking $138.8 billion in 2008, nearly $25 billion above budget limits originally set by Rumsfeld. The Army's budget this year is $98.2 billion, making Schoomaker's request a 41% increase over current levels.

The Army, with an active-duty force of 504,000, has been stretched by the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. About 400,000 have done at least one tour of combat duty, and more than a third of those have been deployed twice. Commanders have increasingly complained of the strain, saying last week that sustaining current levels will require more help from the National Guard and Reserve or an increase in the active-duty force. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-mi...ll=la-home-h

I'm behind our President and troops, but Iran must become more supportive toward world order and peace.

INDEX OF ENTERIES ON BLOG AT http://batman47.bravejournal.com

Iran Nuclear Reactor Future and the World Divided On Whether Iran Has the Right to Uranium Enrichment Part I, II and III References

Iran's Present Military Strength and Israel’s Air Strike Capabilities

Iran IRIAF - a new Air Force? Window to the Past (70/80s)

Pillars of the Temple of Liberty

Iran Nuclear Reactor Future and the World Divided On Whether Iran Has the Right to Uranium Enrichment http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/802823.aspx

Iran This, Iran That, Iran-STFU! http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?p=136329

U. S. War against Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, PLO war Against Israel & the U. S. & Allies; Al-Qaida warns Muslims: Time to get out of U.S. http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/869751.aspx

This is how Israel negotiates with terrorists--oohRAH! http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=8971

Letter from the beseeched country of Israel; Office of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/688401.aspx

Weapons of Mass Destruction; EQNEEDF letter to The President of the U.S. Of America http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/684851.aspx

Should Israel Stand Alone? http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/679704.aspx

The Silent War at Home http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/635177.aspx

Americans killed by Middle East-based terrorists; beginning with Robert "Bobby" Kennedy http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/752461.aspx

Democratic Party of Hizballah http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/754044.aspx

EQNEEDF RENEWABLE ENERGY LETTER http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/761121.aspx

Independence from Middle East Oil through expanded Renewable Energy Technologies http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/876199.aspx

There are grave and great costs to war. That's why you must fight to win, and be as fast as you can about it, while being effective, which often takes time and as a result there is enduring hardships and grave sacrifices our servicemembers and those of coalition forces encounter.

Historical Excellence; Honoring Patriots who made the Ultimate Sacrifice for Freedom http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?p=136205

According to a recent VA study, more than one-third of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans seeking medical treatment from the Veterans Administration report symptoms of stress or other mental disorders. This represents a tenfold increase in the last eighteen months. The dramatic jump in cases is causing concern among some veterans groups that VA may not be able to meet the demand. Psychologists have said all deployed servicemembers will encounter stress during their deployments. Physical signs of stress may include upset stomach, vomiting, muscular contractions, sweating, shakiness, tension, disorientation, vision problems, hyperventilation, exhaustion, urinary frequency and diarrhea. Emotional signs of stress include feeling anxious or agitated, guilt, fear, anger, grief, general loss of emotional control, depression, emotional numbing, and feeling abandoned or lost. Seek professional help if you experience prolonged isolation from friends, anger, irritability, depression that does not decrease with time, frequent suicidal thoughts and alcohol or drug abuse.

Free Online Military Benefits Education Seminar

University Alliance is offering a free online Education Benefits seminar to servicemembers and veterans on November 1st at 6:30 pm EST. Coast Guard Chief Petty Officer, Terry Howell will explain the GI Bill and how to use it in conjunction with tuition assistance to get the most out of your education benefits. Register now. http://www.iian.ibeam.com/events/bisk001/20248

Legislation Increases Dependents' Education Benefits

Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) recently introduced the Disabled Warriors’ Family Education Act of 2006. This bill will allow spouses and dependent children to access their Survivors’ and Dependents’ Education Assistance, under chapter 35 of title 38, United States Code, prior to the severely injured servicemember being discharged from active duty. Once the servicemember receives a VA rating stating that their injuries are permanent and total in nature the servicemember’s spouse and college-aged dependent children may begin their education during the servicemember’s convalescence period, which in some instances may be two years.

Hiring Heroes Paves Road to Jobs

In its second year, the Hiring Heroes program has helped more than 1,000 injured servicemembers and their families connect with potential employers. Hiring Heroes is co-sponsored by The Office of the Secretary of Defense, DoD’s Military Severely Injured Center and Monster.com, a networking hub for current and former military people, defense workers and their families. For more information about Hiring Heroes events, call Karen Hannah, Hiring Heroes program manager, at (888) 363-4872 or e-mail her at Karen.Hannah@cpms.osd.mil .

Injury Insurance Surprise

The new Traumatic Injury Protection under Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) is still referred to as “Wounded Warrior Insurance” by proponents who pushed it through Congress last year with surprising speed. But for injuries incurred after Nov. 30, 2005, the phrase “wounded warrior” fails to capture the breadth of TSGLI. That is because any servicemember, active or reserve, who has Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) and suffers a traumatic injury can be eligible for the trauma pay. For more information, read the article on the Military.com website at http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,114408,00.html.

CENTCOM Leadership & DOD Web Sites

Gen. John Abizaid Commander http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/GeneralJohnAbizaid.aspx Vice Adm. David C. Nichols Jr. Deputy Commander http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/deputycommander.aspx Maj. Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III Chief of Staff http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/Chief%20of%20Staff.aspx CMSgt Curtis L. Brownhill Command Chief Master Sergeant http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/commandcms.

DoD Websites Unified Combatant Commands http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/almanac/

USARCENT (Army) http://www.arcent.army.mil/

USCENTAF (Air Force) http://www.centaf.af.mil/

USNAVCENT (Navy) http://www.cusnc.navy.mil/Index.htm

USCG (Coast Guard) http://www.uscg.mil/USCG.shtm

SOCCENT http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/Shared%20Documents/Joint%20Spe

USMARCENT (Marines) https://www.marcent.usmc.mil/nipr/marcentIndex.asp http://www.centcom.mil/sites/uscentcom1/default.aspx

Official Website for the United States Marine Corps - Operation Iraqi ... http://www.marines.mil/marinelink/mcn2000.nsf/oif

Marine Corps Images-Iraqi Freedom http://www.marines.mil/marinelink/image1.nsf/iraqifreedom?OpenView&Sta

Marine Corps OIF Press Releases http://www.marines.mil/marinelink/mcn2000.nsf/oifMCreleases

Operation Enduring Freedom http://www.marines.mil/marinelink/mcn2000.nsf/oef

Marine News http://www.usmc.mil/marinelink/mcn2000.nsf/news

Flag Officer Assignments

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Mullen announced the following flag officer assignments:

Rear Adm. (lower half) Moira N. Flanders is being assigned as commander, Naval Personnel Development Command, Norfolk, Va. Flanders is currently serving as director, Strategy Planning and Analysis Division, N14, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, Washington, D.C. 10/02/06

Rear Adm. (lower half)(selectee) Scott H. Swift is being assigned as deputy commander, U.S. Naval Forces, U.S. Central Command, Bahrain. Swift is currently serving as deputy executive officer for Naval Aviation and Tactical Air Systems, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington, D.C.

Rear Adm. (lower half)(selectee) Michael P. Tillotson is being assigned as deputy commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command, Norfolk, Va. Tillotson is currently serving as deputy director, Standing Joint Force Headquarters North, U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo. http://www.defenselink.mil/Releases/Release.aspx?ReleaseID=10030

Flag Officer Assignment 10/04/06

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Mullen announced the following flag officer assignment:

Rear Adm. (lower half) John W. Miller is being assigned as deputy director, plans and policy, U.S. Central Command, Macdill Air Force Base, Fla. Miller is currently serving as deputy commander, U.S. Naval Forces, U.S. Central Command, Bahrain. http://www.defenselink.mil/Releases/Release.aspx?ReleaseID=10045

Will US Attack Iran?

Uncle Chutzpah and His Willing Executioners on the Dire Iran Threat: With Twelve Principles of War Propaganda in Ongoing Service by Edward S. Herman http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?itemid=9910

Nuclear War Against Iran by Michel Chossudovsky http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=%20CH2

Iran's Euro-denominated Oil Bourse to Open in March; US$ Crash Imminent! by William Clark http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=47790%00

The Next War: Crossing the Rubicon by John Pilger http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb06/Pilger13.htm

Who Will Blow the Whistle Before We Attack Iran? by Ray McGovern http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021306A.shtml

http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/iran.htm

Top 25 Censored Stories of 2007 http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#22

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER AND THE CARRIER INDUSTRIAL BASE AS OF YEARS END 2006 & 2007

U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER AND THE CARRIER INDUSTRIAL BASE AS OF 2006

The U.S. Navy’s Aircraft Carrier force planning document as early as 1947, seen as the beginning of the cold war, called for 12 CVAs. The Navy’s carrier strength has averaged between 12 to 15 with the exception of Korea and Vietnam until 2001 and has remained at 12 until present day. With the possible decommissioning of USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) in FY 2006, the U.S. carrier inventory will be reduced to 11. U.S. global considerations include the Caribbean, Western Pacific Ocean, Mediterranean Sea/Europe, Indian Ocean, Arabian Sea, Persian Gulf and the Red Sea. It is generally recognized that 15 carriers (5 to 1 ratio) would be necessary to support all these contingencies in peace time due to sailor rotation, pre deployment exercises and length of time spent in port due to overhaul and maintenance. At present, the U. S Navy could respond with 11 carriers if a World wide conflict occurred, referred to by some as World War III. In post cold war years, limited gaps of carrier presence in these areas have been acceptable. During Operation Desert Shield, eighth carriers were deployed, while six carriers commenced Operation Desert Storm upon conclusion of Desert Shield on the same deployment, while there were 11 deployments of U.S. Aircraft Carriers in Support of Operation Desert Storm, with USS America (CV-66) making two deployments in support of the war. Libyan operations required three Atlantic carriers in the Mediterranean Sea in March 1986. During Operation Enduring Freedom 9 carriers deployed, while two carriers also commenced Operation Iraqi Freedom, with a total of 15 deployments as of USS Enterprise (CVN-65) in which 5 carriers made two deployments. During Operation Southern Watch, 50 deployments were made by 15 carriers, many making several deployments during the length of the Operation over a period of many years.

The days of yesterday gone, while the future illuminates the need for U.S. Aircraft Carrier presence in various regions of the world at the same in which Summer Pulse 2004 illustrated could be done. A major Theater of War (MTW) is estimated to require four or five carriers and the National Military Strategy envisions response to two MTWs simultaneously. The U. S. Navy fleet of Aircraft Carriers must increase by at least two if we intend to remain the peace keepers of the world, fighting global war on terror, especially with the possibility of World War III beckoning at the door.

THE NAVY WILL RETAIN 12 CARRIERS UNTIL BUSH IS COMMISSIONED IF KENNEDY DECOMMISSIONS AT YEARS END 2007. ONE CARRIER UNDER GOING IT'S 3 1/2 YEAR RCOH COMMENCING NOVEMBER 2005 AND NEXT YEAR ONE STATESIDE DUE TO MAINTENANCE, LEAVE ROTATION, ETC. WHILE THIS YEAR TWO WILL BE UNDER GOING MAINTENANCE FROM THE FALL TO MARCH 2007. DURING 2007, WE CAN CALL ON TEN CARRIERS, ELEVEN IN A PINCH AND MOST LIKELY 9 OPERATING WHILE 4 TO 6 CARRIERS WILL MAKE DEPLOYMENTS IF THE LEVEL OF THREAT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOESN'T PICK UP.

The USS Kennedy (CV-67) is scheduled to decommission in 2007, most likely around the same time USS George W. Bush (CVN-77) commissions due to manning relaties, leaving our navy with eleven active carriers due to USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70) RCOH, being towed from Naval Station Norfolk to Northrop Grumman's Newport News Shipbuilding in order to begin the Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) 11 November 2005, where she will be completely refitted, and the nuclear fuel that powers the Nimitz-class carrier will be replenished in a period of 3 1/2 years; commencing planning for 2005’s RCOH upon return from her second around-the-world deployment and home port transfer from Bremerton, Washington, upon conclusion of her six-month deployment 31 July 2005, her tenth Indian Ocean deployment and fifth Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf deployment) in support for Operation Iraqi Freedom on her first Gulf of Aden and Red Sea voyage, on her first Suez Canal transit and second voyage in the Mediterranean Sea.

With Carl Vinson (CVN-70) unavailable until mid 2009, the U. S. in early, mid or late 2007, once USS George W. Bush (CVN-78) commissions and USS John F. Kennedy (CV-67) decomissions, the U. S. Navy will face world wide threats with 11 active carriers. Must I alone sound the horn, surely there are still some Admirals that will voice there opinion without fear of being fired.

If the Navy decommissions Kennedy prior to Carl Vinson completion of RCOH and with at least one carrier on a 6-month SRA, ESRA, EDSRA, PIA, DPIA, or PSA, during 2007 and early to mid 2008, possibly two, our carrier strength could be as low as 9 active carriers during 2007 for duty, simply amazing, exactly one more then before WW II.

President George W. Bush will deliver the principal address at the christening ceremony of the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, named for his father, former President George H. W. Bush, at a 10 a.m. EDT on Saturday, Oct. 7 at Northrop Grumman Newport News Shipyard, Newport News, Va.

In 2008, the USS George Washington (CVN-73) is to replace the conventionally powered carrier USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) at Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan, Kitty Hawk herself scheduled to decommission in 2008, leaving the U. S. Navy 11 carriers with ten active until mid 2009 when Carl Vinson completes RCOH and while the hole of Japan may be divided on the idea, Yokosuka mayor Ryoichi Kabaya told Japanese reporters prior to April 24, 2006, that the city would be willing to accept the deployment of a U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft, according to a report in the Asahi Shimbunand.

The U.S. Navy is planning to set up an emergency operations center in the event of an accident involving the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier it plans to deploy in 2008 to its base in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, sources said August 4, 2006.

Iran to abandon deal with Japan Sep 30, 2006
http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_18004.shtml

By Farhad Pouladi - TEHRAN Iran warned Japan Monday it has just two days of last-ditch talks to give a final answer on whether to go ahead with a two billion dollar contract to develop the Islamic republic's largest onshore oil field. Iran warns Japan as oil deal hangs in balance Tehran warns it will seek another partner to develop Azadegan oil field unless Japan gives positive answer shortly. http://195.224.230.11/english/?id=17687

THE ASAHI SHIMBUN
Japan officials: Iran oil field talks still alive 10/06/2006 http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200610060150.html

Oct. 6, 2006, 11:23AM Japan Cutting Stake in Iran Oil Project By HIROKO TABUCHI Associated Press Writer
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4240924.html

TOKYO (AFP)
Japan braces to lose part of Iranian oil mega-project 10-06-2006, 04h57
http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=145304

AFP
Japan to lose most of Iranian oil mega-project 6 October 2006
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/theworld/ 2006/October/theworld_October196.xml§ion=theworld&col=

Iranian president says his country is determined to expand uranium http://www.fox6.com/news/world/story.aspx?content_id=4B8D4591-BC9B-428 1-8A77-3647E23D4E35

You’d think we would have a carrier under going SLEP right know just in case we need to replace Kitty Hawk with a CV or for that matter, needed an extra carrier for back up. These very issues are one reason I decided three years ago to do something to get the Navy to start focusing on there carrier strengths and enlistments.

It could be the Navy is relying on our subs with there rearmament package of nonnuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (Conventional Trident Missiles) that will give America a necessary quick-strike weapon in the war on terror, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said June 7.

Maybe 12 to 15 carriers won’t be needed. If that’s the case a lot of hurt will be felt by someone but I don’t see how subs will be able to police the sky in order to prevent major escalation in the theater of operations in the Mid East in particular.

Ref: AIRCRAFT CARRIER AND THE CARRIER INDUSTRIAL BASEhttp://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR948/MR948.chap2.pdf

With the return of the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) with CVW-14 embarked, departing San Diego, California 5 January 2006 for her maiden voyage, on her first “Westpac” and first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Exercise "Valiant Shield 2006" operating with USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) in Guam operating area from 19 to 23 June; her second deployment since her commission, the Navy’s 775th Foreign Water Fleet Deployment, the 83rd Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment, the 120th Indian Ocean deployment and 18th deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom as of 8 July 2006. USS Enterprise (CVN-65) presently underway in support of OIF is the 19th deployment in support of OIF made by U. S. Aircraft Carriers, while her deployment to the far east is her 6th Arabian Sea and Persian Gulf deployment on her 2nd Operation Iraqi Freedom deployment and the Navy’s 778th Foreign Water Fleet Deployment. USS Kitty Hawk’s present Summer Underway Period in support of Exercise "Valiant Shield 2006" is the Navy’s 779th Foreign Water Fleet Deployment as of 8 July 2006 and the Navy’s 72nd forward deployed deployment out of Yokosuka, Japan (NAF Atsugi, Japan). USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) arrival from her 4th Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment and 1st OIF was the Navy’s 773rd Foreign Water Fleet deployment, the 17th deployment in support OIF and the 123rd Suez Canal transit, and upon USS Enterprise (CVN-65) return from the far east, will make the 124th Suez Canal transit; provided CVN-65 returns through the Suez Canal.Valiant Shield 2006 - Three Carrier Strike Groups http://www.pacom.mil/exercises/vs2006/imagery060619e.shtml

U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER DESIGN 1941 TO 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart25.pdf

U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEPLOYMENTS WITH AIR WINGS FROM 1990 TO 2005http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart24.pdf

U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER EAST AND WEST COAST DEPLOYMENTS COMBINED EARLIEST DATE FROM 1990 to 2005

http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart30.pdf

U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEPLOYMENTS BY HULL NO. CLASSIFICATION AND TOTAL DEPLOYMENTS FROM September 1945 to 8 June 2006

http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart31.pdf

U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER DEPLOYMENTS THROUGHOUT OCEANS AND SEAS FROM September 1945 to 8 June 2006
http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart32.pdf

SUMMARY OF FOREIGN WATER FLEET DEPLOYMENTS BY NUMBEREDCARRIER DEPLOYMENT September 1945 to 8 June 2006
http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart48.pdf

CORAL SEA SHIP’S PERSONNEL PHOTO http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart52.pdf

Red Sea, Gulf of Aden voyages, Suez Canal transits, North Arabian Sea, Arabian Sea and Persian Gulf deployments from 9 October 1947 to 8 June 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart53.pdf

U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIERS WITH AIR WINGS THAT PARTICIPATED IN MAJOR OPERATIONS FROM 1990 TO 8 June 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart54.pdf

COMMISSIONED U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER REPORTS FROM 1990 TO 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart9.pdf

U. S. NAVY COMMISSIONED AND ACTIVE CARRIERS FROM 1946 TO 2006http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart10.pdf

COMMISSIONED U. S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER STATUS AS OF 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart11.pdf

Current Aircraft Carrier Location - http://www.ne.jp/asahi/gonavy/atsugi/gonavy604.html

References:

The U.S. Navy is planning to set up an emergency operations center in the event of an accident involving the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier it plans to deploy in 2008 to its base in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, sources said Thursday.

The navy has said the 102,000-ton USS George Washington has no history of radiation leaks, but the plan calls for more than a dozen experts on nuclear accident prevention to be permanently assigned to the center.The members will monitor reactor and radiation levels, gather information and prevent radiation from spreading if an accident occurs, they said.

The center will be located inside the base near the headquarters for all U.S. naval forces in Japan. The navy plans to devise effective disaster prevention scenarios by next summer and conduct training for about a year before going into operation, the sources said.

Although the navy has declined comment, the sources said it set up a smaller emergency operations center in the past in connection with about 20 nuclear submarines that visit the base every year.

The United States has stressed the safety of the George Washington, which will replace the conventional-powered USS Kitty Hawk in 2008. It says the reactor would not be used while the vessel is in the harbor and the impact of any accident would be contained within the base.

But some experts have said an accident involving the carrier, which has an energy output equivalent to a medium-size nuclear plant, could kill up to 1.6 million people in and around Yokosuka. The Japan Times

UP.President George W. Bush will deliver the principal address at the christening ceremony of the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, named for his father, former President George H. W. Bush, at a 10 a.m. EDT on Saturday, Oct. 7 at Northrop Grumman Newport News Shipyard, Newport News, Va.

The last of the Nimitz-class carriers is named in honor of World War II naval aviator and America’s 41st President of the United States, George Herbert Walker Bush. The former president was born in Milton, Mass., on June 12, 1924, and began a lifetime of service to America when he joined the Navy on his 18th birthday as a seaman. He became the youngest pilot in the Navy at the time, receiving his commission and naval aviator wings before his 19th birthday.

Bush flew the Avenger torpedo bomber in combat from the carrier USS San Jacinto. During an attack on enemy installations near Chichi Jima in September 1944, his plane was hit by enemy fire while making a bombing run. Although the plane was on fire and heavily damaged, he completed a strafing run on the target before bailing out of the doomed aircraft. Bush parachuted into the sea and was later rescued by the Navy submarine USS Finback. He was later awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and three Air Medals for his Navy service in the Pacific theater during World War II.

After his Navy service ended in September 1945, Bush served America in a number of public service roles that included two-terms as a U.S. congressman from Texas, ambassador to the United Nations, chief of the U.S. Liaison Office to China and director of the Central Intelligence Agency. He then served two terms as vice president under former President Ronald Reagan before being elected himself as President of the United States in 1988. As commander-in-chief, Bush led the United States and a coalition of nearly 30 other nations during Operation Desert Storm, which ended Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait and liberated the people of the small Persian Gulf nation.

Doro Bush Koch, daughter of former President George H.W. Bush, will serve as ship’s sponsor. The ceremony will be highlighted by Koch breaking a bottle of American sparkling wine across the ship’s bow to formally christen the ship, which is a time-honored Navy tradition. The former president and his wife, Barbara, are scheduled to attend the ceremony.

America’s carriers serve a vital role in the defense of the American people. Deploying around the globe in support of U.S. interests and commitments, U.S. aircraft carriers are in place to immediately respond to emerging military and humanitarian crises and in various roles ranging from peacetime presence to full-scale war.

Capt. Kevin O'Flaherty, a native of Los Angeles, Calif., and a 1981 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, is the prospective commanding officer. In that capacity, he will be responsible for more than 5,000 crewmembers, to include the embarked air wing, when the ship is commissioned and fully operational.

Nimitz-class aircraft carriers, at 1,092 feet in length and 97,000 tons displacement, are the largest warships in the world. Traveling at speeds in excess of 30 knots and with flight decks encompassing 4.5 acres, they can easily support an air wing of about 75 aircraft.

For more information on Nimitz-class carriers, visit: www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=4200&tid=200&ct=4 http://www.defenselink.mil/Releases/Release.aspx?ReleaseID=10043

In 2008, the USS George Washington is to replace the conventionally powered carrier USS Kitty Hawk at Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan. http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/810442.aspx

USS George Washington (CVN-73 ) will begin a DPIA (Drydocking Planned Incremental Availability) lin the Fall of 2006, leaving the Navy with 9 out of 12 carriers active from the Fall of 2006 until around March 2007.

NavSource Online: Aircraft Carrier Photo ArchiveUSS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN-73) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/73.htm

The aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln will be sidelined for routine, but extensive, maintenance, starting next month.

The Lincoln, site of President Bush's memorable 'Mission Accomplished' speech after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, will undergo Docking Planned Incremental Availability (DPIA) work at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from Sept. 5 through mid-March of next year.T

he DPIA process involves an extensive modernization of the Abe's compartments and systems and is routine for the U.S. Navy's Nimitz-class nuclear carriers. The ship made its maiden deployment in 1991.

Todd Shipyards said this week it will carry out the maintenance process as part of a nearly $11 million modification to a previous contract covering the overhaul and maintenance for carriers based in Puget Sound.

The DPIA involves dry-docking the flattop and overhauling scores of systems, including catapults and flight-deck elevators as well as the ship's massive propellers. The program is aimed at extending the service life of the ships. http://nosint.blogspot.com/2006/08/us-carrier-lincoln-slated-for-drydock.html

NavSource Online: Aircraft Carrier Photo ArchiveUSS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN-72) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/72.htm

Report: Yokosuka mayor now OK with nuclear ship U.S. document on vessels’ safety said to assuage fears Stars and Stripes Pacific edition, Monday, April 24, 2006 Yokosuka mayor Ryoichi Kabaya told Japanese reporters last week that the city would be willing to accept the deployment of a U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft, according to a report in the Asahi Shimbun. [SEE REPORT BELOW]

In 2008, the USS George Washington is to replace the conventionally powered carrier USS Kitty Hawk at Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan. Soon after the deployment plan was revealed in October, Kabaya, in a joint campaign with Kanagawa prefecture Gov. Shigefumi Matsuzawa, pledged to demand the central government reconsider the decision.

But Kabaya, the Asahi reported, was swayed after receiving a U.S. document providing a detailed explanation of the functions and safety of U.S. nuclear-powered warships. “If the document is reliable, then I can’t think of any reason to object,” Kabaya is said to have told reporters Monday. Many Yokosuka residents have said a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would bring the risk of nuclear contamination.

In addition, they said the George Washington would increase Yokosuka’s strategic importance in U.S. military operations, raising the chance that the city could become targeted. Kabaya was quoted as saying that the U.S. document was “more concrete and detailed than I had expected, and not superficial.”

The Asahi wrote that the central government has accepted U.S. officials’ explanation that a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier is needed at Yokosuka to protect peace and stability in Japan and the rest of Asia. Source: Stars and Stripes http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=

Yokosuka mayor likely to accept deployment of U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carrier 04/18/2006

The Asahi Shimbun Record of Discussion On April 17, 2006, Minister for Foreign Affairs Taro Aso and Ambassador J. Thomas Schieffer held discussions concerning the replacement of USS Kitty Hawk by USS George Washington, one of the U.S. Navy's nine Nimitz-Class aircraft carriers, scheduled for 2008.

In this connection, both sides wish to record the following. 1. Ambassador Schieffer stated as follows:

As the U.S. Government stated in October 2005 when it announced its decision to replace USS Kitty Hawk with a Nimitz Class aircraft carrier, the U.S. Government is committed to the defense of Japan and the maintenance of peace and stability in the region.

Replacing the USS Kitty Hawk with the USS George Washington significantly improves the U.S. Government's ability to contribute to the defense of Japan, and to protect security interests of the U.S. and its allies in the region. A Nimitz-Class aircraft carrier provides a credible, independent forward presence and deterrence in peacetime, and a potent, sustainable force in a range of operational and war fighting situations.

The U.S. Government appreciates the Government of Japan's support of the decision to forward deploy the USS George Washington to the Western Pacific, which will arrive in Yokosuka in 2008, in order to provide this improved defense capability. As the U.S. Government stated in October 2005, while the U.S. Government was mindful of the request from the local host community to replace the USS Kitty Hawk with a conventionally powered aircraft carrier, it was determined that existing conventionally powered aircraft carriers were not viable options to fulfill the mission of the forward deployed naval force carrier beyond 2008.

The U.S. Fiscal Year 2006 budget includes $14 million in preparation for USS George Washington to be forward-deployed to the Western Pacific to replace USS Kitty Hawk. Furthermore, with regard to the USS John F. Kennedy (JFK), which is the only conventionally powered U.S. aircraft carrier that currently exists except for the USS Kitty Hawk which will retire in 2008, key components of the vessel including the arresting gear, catapult and boilers, which are essential for an aircraft carrier to operate at all, are extensively deteriorated.

Such deterioration compelled the U.S. Navy to suspend flight operations on the vessel. Against this backdrop, the U.S. Government, including the U.S. Navy, announced their determination to decommission the USS John F. Kennedy by 2007, and, in the Congress, a bill has been submitted to allow the USS John F Kennedy to be retired by 2007. This all leads to the conclusion that, as senior U.S. Government defense officials have clearly stated to the Government of Japan, there is no possibility that the USS John F. Kennedy will be forward-deployed to replace USS Kitty Hawk.

At the same time, the U.S. Government is mindful of concerns expressed by the people of Japan, especially the local host community, over the safety of NPWs (Nuclear-Powered Warships). The U.S. Government is committed to working together with the Government of Japan to address these concerns. For this purpose, and bearing in mind the request by the Mayor of the City of Yokosuka Ryoichi Kabaya to Minister Aso on March 23, the U.S. Government has compiled a safety information paper, which will help people to better understand the outstanding performance record and the safety features of U.S. NPWs. 2. Minister Aso replied as follows:

The Government of Japan appreciates the U.S. Government's commitment to the defense of Japan and the maintenance of peace and stability of the region, as well as the U.S. Government's efforts to address the concerns of people, especially in the local host community. The Government of Japan considers that the fact sheet on U.S. nuclear-powered warships [PDF] can be very effective in order to promote the understanding of the local host community.

The Government of Japan would like to ask for continued cooperation of the U.S. Government. The Government of Japan has consistently held the view that the safety of U.S. NPWs visiting Japanese ports is ensured, and believes that this fact sheet further confirms this view. The Government of Japan supports the U.S. Government decision to replace the USS Kitty Hawk with the USS George Washington as the U.S. aircraft carrier forward-deployed to the Western Pacific.

The Government of Japan sees that the presence of the U.S. Navy, including its aircraft carrier, contributes to the security of Japan, and that the security of Japan must not be compromised in any sense by replacing USS Kitty Hawk with a vessel that does not meet the standards of operational readiness and capability required of the U.S. Navy's forward-deployed aircraft carrier. Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/record0604.html

PRESS RELEASE

Bilateral Talks focus on Replacement Carrier at Yokosuka Record of Discussions between the U.S. Government and the Government of Japan Regarding the Replacement of USS Kitty Hawk by USS George Washington June 9, 2006.

On June 9, 2006, Director-General Chikao Kawai of the North American Affairs Bureau of the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Deputy Chief of Mission Joseph R. Donovan Jr. of U.S. Embassy Tokyo held discussions concerning the replacement of USS Kitty Hawk by USS George Washington, one of the U.S. Navy's nine Nimitz-Class aircraft carriers, scheduled for 2008. In this connection, both sides wish to record the following:

1. Deputy Chief of Mission Donovan stated as follows: The U.S. Government has considered very seriously the requests of Yokosuka Mayor Kabaya regarding drill scenarios and a disaster-response mutual aid agreement between the City and the U.S. Navy.

U.S. Navy nuclear-powered warships have an outstanding record of over 134 million miles safely steamed on nuclear power, and over 5,700 reactor-years of safe operation.

Nevertheless, the U.S. Government is willing to work with the Government of Japan to develop credible drill scenarios that test the appropriate level of emergency preparedness. It is understood that the GOJ may include other authorities in these discussions, most notably those of Yokosuka City.

The U.S. Government also proposes to enhance existing processes of informal consultation between CNFJ (Commander, Naval Forces, Japan), CFAY (Commander, Fleet Activities Yokosuka) and relevant parties of Yokosuka City in order to strengthen and deepen several aspects of the friendly relations they have enjoyed during the past decades.

Such a framework could also allow for negotiation on a possible agreement between the City and CNFJ/CFAY on mutual aid in the case of disasters. 2. Director-General Kawai replied as follows:

The Government of Japan appreciates the U.S. Government's efforts to address the concerns of the Japanese people, especially in the host local community, and welcomes the U.S. Government's proposals. The Government of Japan will immediately consult with relevant parties of Yokosuka City, with a view to starting discussions regarding appropriate drill scenarios, and enhancing existing processes of informal consultation between the City and CNFJ/CFAY. Source: Embassy of the United States, Japan http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/p/tp-20060612-77.html

Japan accepts US nuke carrier (AP) Updated: 2006-06-14 18:07 The mayor of a Japanese city said Wednesday he would accept the deployment of a US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, reversing his former opposition to the plan. The comment by Yokosuka Mayor Ryoichi Kabaya was immediately welcomed by US Ambassador to Japan Thomas Schieffer. Kabaya had opposed the carrier because of safety concerns.

The US Navy announced in October the plan to deploy a Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in Japan for the first time in 2008. The next month, Kabaya presented a petition opposing the plan to Schieffer. But Kabaya told the 45-member Yokosuka city assembly on Wednesday that residents would have to accept the new carrier, which will replace the aging USS Kitty Hawk, a conventionally powered ship.

"Now that there is no possibility of a conventional carrier being deployed, we need to face reality and consider as inevitable the deployment of a nuclear-powered carrier," Kabaya said. US and Japanese officials could meet as early as Thursday to discuss specifics of the deployment, including getting port facilities ready to receive the vessel, a Foreign Ministry official said on condition of anonymity, citing protocol. Some citizens' groups expressed their opposition to the plan.

"(The city) should more thoroughly listen to citizens' wishes before taking the decision," said Masahiko Goto, who represents a group opposed to the deployment. But Schieffer welcomed Kabaya's statement. "We are committed to maintaining the impeccable safety record of America's nuclear-powered carriers," the ambassador said in a statement.

"The US government will continue to listen and seriously consider the views of local residents and political leaders regarding this deployment." The Kitty Hawk, commissioned in 1961, is the Navy's oldest ship in full active service. The new carrier would arrive in Japan in 2008, when the Kitty Hawk is scheduled to return to the United States and be decommissioned.

The replacement comes amid an overall plan to restructure and streamline the 50,000-strong American military presence in Japan, and raise the US ally's profile in securing the Asia-Pacific region. The restructuring would also alleviate some of the grievances levied by people in Okinawa, a southern island which hosts nearly half of the US troops, by moving about 8,000 Marines to the US Pacific territory of Guam. Source: ChinaDaily http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2006-06/14/content_617027.htm

YOKOSUKA, Kanagawa Prefecture--An a policy shift that could infuriate citizens, Yokosuka Mayor Ryoichi Kabaya said the city would accept the deployment of the U.S. nuclear-powered aircraft carrier George Washington in 2008.

The George Washington will replace the retiring conventionally powered flattop Kitty Hawk at the U.S. Yokosuka Naval Base, south of Tokyo. Soon after the deployment plan was revealed in October last year, Kabaya, in a joint campaign with Kanagawa Governor Shigefumi Matsuzawa, pledged to demand the central government reconsider the decision. However, Kabaya changed his tune after receiving a U.S. document providing a detailed explanation of the functions and safety of U.S. nuclear-powered warships.

''If the document is reliable, then I can't think of any reason to object,'' Kabaya told reporters Monday. But residents of this densely populated city of 426,000 might come up with a few. By the end of March, citizens groups had collected 470,000 signatures opposing the deployment plan. Many Yokosuka residents said a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would bring the risk of nuclear contamination.

In addition, they said the George Washington would increase Yokosuka's strategic importance in U.S. military operations, raising the chance that the city could become targeted. Others are opposed to anything nuclear. Kabaya said the document was ''more concrete and detailed than I had expected, and not superficial.''

He said he was briefed on the document by Junji Shimada, director of Japan-U.S. Security Treaty Division at the Foreign Ministry. ''The reason why we had urged (Tokyo and Washington) to deploy a conventional carrier is our deep-rooted concerns over safety,'' the mayor said. '

'We still have issues to deal with, such as coming up with measures from the perspective of disaster prevention and other aspects.'' He said if the George Washington's safety is confirmed, he would accept it as a replacement for the Kitty Hawk. ''There would be no grounds to oppose,'' he said.

The central government has accepted U.S. officials' explanation that a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier is needed at the Yokosuka Naval Base to protect peace and stability in Japan and Asia. Thomas Schieffer, the U.S. ambassador to Japan, gave Foreign Minister Taro Aso the same document Monday to underscore the safety of U.S. nuclear-powered warships.

''Conventionally, the Japanese government has been steadfastly confident of the safety of nuclear-powered U.S. warships when they make port calls, and this document will further ensure the judgment,'' Aso said. Mayor Kabaya had been staunchly opposed to the deployment of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in his city.

On Nov. 1 last year, Kanagawa Governor Matsuzawa visited Kabaya in Yokosuka, where the two agreed to urge the central government to call off the decision to replace the Kitty Hawk with the George Washington.

''The city will strongly call on the central government to reconsider the decision in tandem with the prefecture,'' Kabaya said after the meeting.(IHT/Asahi: April 18,2006) Source: Asahi.com http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200604180256.html

USS KITTY HAWK (CVA-63) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/63.htm

USS ENTERPRISE (CVAN-65) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/65.htm

USS JOHN F. KENNEDY (CVA-67) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/67.htm

USS NIMITZ (CVAN-68) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/68.htm

USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN-69) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/69.htm

USS CARL VINSON (CVN-70) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/70.htm

USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/71.htm

USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN-73) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/73.htm

USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN-74) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/74.htm

USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN-72) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/72.htm

USS HARRY S. TRUMAN (CVN-75) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/75.htm

USS RONALD REAGAN (CVN-76) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/76.htm

PCU GEORGE H.W. BUSH (CVN-77) http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/77.htm

NavSource Online: Aircraft Carrier Photo Archive http://www.navsource.org/archives/02idx.htm

My attorney will be filing an Official Request for Release of Information next week to the U. S. Navy( http://www.infoprivacylaw.com/foia.htm )

On behalf of those who have served onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers I would like the U. S. Navy to disclose on the internet information relating to US Aircraft Carrier Foreign Water Fleet Deployments, all classification, by earliest dates and time of arrival and departure from September 1945 to present and foreign ports visited. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/547160195

FOIA FILLING DATE WILL BE REPORTED NEXT WEEKSUMMARY OF FOREIGN WATE FLEET DEPLOYMENTS BY NUMBERED CARRIER DEPLOYMENT September 1945 to 8 June 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart48.pdf

Sunday, September 24, 2006

“Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” (1980)

THIRTEENTH “WESTPAC” DEPLOYMENT AND
FIRST INDIAN & ARABIAN SEA DEPLOYMENT
Iranian revolution & Iran hostage crisis
Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan on the way home via Korea
(13 November 1979 to 11 June 1980)

I was the Operations Department Yeoman for three years and the Special Services Yeoman in port Bremerton, Washington for six months. I arranged ski trips for the crew.
http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/index_files/page0001.htm

My fellow shipmates and I, along with other service members of the USS Nimitz (CVN-68), naval escort ships; Army Rangers, Air Force and Marines, all played a role in “Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” regardless of his duty. Now days I guess I would have to say his or her role.

The Coral Sea left Singapore 29 January 1980 and was at sea for 7-days prior to relieving USS Midway (CVW-41) in the northern part of the Arabian Sea on 5 February 1980 in connection with the continuing hostage crisis in Iran.

The Coral Sea traveled 6-days before entering a port, spending 89-days in the Indian Ocean and "GONZO" Station in the North Arabian Sea; while the USS Coral Sea (CV-43) was at sea a continuous 102-days. The Coral Sea crew was awarded the Sea Service Ribbon, Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Navy Expeditionary Medal.

The USS CORAL SEA CV-42, CVA-43, CVB-43 and CV-43 HISTORY, AND A TOUR OF DUTY IN THE U. S. NAVY (August 1977—February 1983) CONSTRUCTION to LAUNCHING and EARLY JET AIRCRAFT DEVELOPMENT (10 July 1944 TO 2 April 1946) story and tour of duty discloses events that have never been disclosed before and is due for release by years end.

The flowing is presented as an historical summary of “Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” and is more relevant then you can imagine in light of current events.

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) with CVW-14 embarked (tail code NK) departed 13
November 1979 Alameda, California, on her 13th “Westpac” deployment operating with the Pacific Fleet (25 January 1960 to Present) and tour of duty with the 7th Fleet in the Far East, she will under go her first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea deployment during the Iranian revolution & Iran Hostage Crisis to strengthen the U.S. Naval presence in the crucial Indian Ocean area as tensions heightened over Iran's taking of 52 American diplomats’ hostage, in what would turn out to be Operation Evening Light during Operation Eagle Claw, the attempt to rescue the US Embassy workers being held hostage in Tehran,Iran. Prior to her deployment conducted an intensive workup cycle, refresher training and CarQuals, to include many visits at North Island Naval Air Station, San Diego, Ca. February to November 1979 and was the ready carrier off the coast of California for about four months going from off the coast of Mexico, up to the Aleutians, and back, completing overhaul at Puget Sound Naval Ship Yard, Bremerton, Washington and sailed for Alameda, Ca. (6 March 1978 to 8 February 1979), during which time on 20 November 1978, Coral Sea suffers a fire of unknown origin while moored at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Wash., which causes damage to the medical and dental spaces, delaying departure from the Ship Yard as the medical department was completely gutted by the fire (11 months - the carrier underwent $80,000,000 overhaul, during which the last of her 5-inch battery and all gun directors were removed - thirty-six years old., during which time Captain Stanley R. Arthur, relieved Captain Aitcheson, Jr. 3 June 1978 with Commander Hutchinson being relieved by Commander Curtain, USN, the Operations Department Head, frocked to Captain and assumed duties as the XO, while Captain Stanley R. Arthur is scheduled for rotation in December with Captain Richard M Dunleavy, to become the first Naval Flight Officer in history to command an aircraft carrier (NHC Battle Order p _). Reclassified CV-43 30 June 1975; involved in two Vietnam peace coast patrol cruises, ending with Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of Saigon 28 April 1975 during the evacuation of the Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh 12 April 1975 in Operation Eagle Pull, while her first Vietnam peace coast patrol cruise was during Operation Homecoming (9 March 1973 to 11 August 1973), following six Vietnam War Combat cruises during the Vietnam Conflict/War (1 November 1965 to 17 July 1972), completing her 1st & 2nd Vietnam Expeditionary Force (VEF) deployments during her 1st & 2nd “Westpac,” (first CVA in the Bering Sea during 12 December 1961 to 17 July 1962 deployment). She will under go her 13th foreign water deployment since her visit to Vancouver, B.C. (18 to 22 March 1960) when she deployed from Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington upon completion of sea trials and a post-overhaul inspection and survey evaluation, commencing once recommissioned, following SCB 110A conversion (16 April 1957 to 25 January 1960), decommissioned 24 April 1957, completing nine tours of duty in the Mediterranean Sea operating with the 6th Fleet (7 June 1948 to 13 August 1956); reclassified hull classification symbol CVA-43 1 October 1952. She will under go her 24th deployment since her commission 1 October 1947” (Ref.1-Coral Sea, 2-USS Coral Sea “Welcome Aboard” brochure, 34, 35 & 72).

USS Coral Sea (CVA-43) Air Wing would change from Carrier Air Wing FIFTEEN (CVW-15) to Carrier Air Wing FOURTEEN (CVW-14); marking the first time since World War II that two Marine fighter squadrons comprised the fighter arm of a Navy Air Wing. VMFA-323 and 531 F-4Ns covered CVW-14 during a period of hectic West Coast fighter transition” (Ref. 43).

“On 5 October 1960, Coral Sea debarked her two fighter squadrons ashore at Atsugi while embarking two Marine Douglas Skyraider' -Night fighter modified for cold weather Jet Attack Bomber squadrons, VMA-121 and VMA-324, thus pioneering the "all attack" carrier concept” (Ref. 43 & 72).

VMA-324 - Marines – Vagabonds - Attack Squadron flew the Douglas Skyhawk –
Jet Attack Bomber - Drone director - DX600 (TC) of the A4D-2

VMA-121 - Marines – Green Knights - Attack Squadron flew the Douglas Skyhawk –
Jet Attack Bomber - Drone director - VK800 (TC) of the A4D-2

Photos of Marine and Navy Aircraft during 1960 that flew onboard USS Coral Sea (CV-43) http://www.usscoralsea.net/pages/lnr60s.html

“The Air Wing was comprised of six squadrons and two detachments (elements of a parent squadron) which, acting in concert, perform the vital functions of attack, air intercept and support.

Carrier Air Wing FOURTEEN (CVW-14) was comprised of highly accurate, light-attack weapons platform incorporation a number intricate computer systems adding in the precise deliverance of a variety of ordnance as is the case in the A-7E Corasir, flown by the Shrikes of VA-94 and Redcocks of VA-22, both based at NAS Lemoore, Ca. in 1978.

The first time onboard, CVW-14 embarked on Coral Sea in November 1979 in route to the Western Pacific.

The air wing’s fighter arm was comprised of two U.S. Marine Corps fighter squadrons, flying F-4N Phantom II’s. The Death Rattlers of VMFA-323 and the Grey Ghosts of VMFA-531 joined the CVW-14 team, marking the first time since World War II that two Marine fighter squadrons comprised the fighter arm of a Navy Air Wing. They Grey Ghosts were normally a part of the 3rd Marine Air Wing home based at MCAS El Toro.

VMFA-323 and VMFA-531 joined Carrier Air Wing FOURTEEN officially on 1 July 1979, and for the first time since World War II, two Marine fighter squadrons deployed aboard a Pacific Fleet carrier. It was also the first time without a Navy fighter squadron in the air wing.

Captain Dave Rogers, USN, assumed command of CVW-14 aboard the USS Enterprise when the wing had F-14A Tomcats in place of the F-4Ns deployed onboard the Coral Sea. Captain Rogers or CAG, qualified in the RF-8G Crusader while attached to the Enterprise, bringing a total of 12 different types of aircraft he flew during his tour aboard the USS Enterprise. Prior to Captain Rogers’s assignment to the Coral Sea as CAG of CVW-14, CAG Rogers had flown 40 different types of military aircraft, with over 900 landings on 14 different carriers.

The Snakes were commanded by LTCOL Dave Denton, and were last deployed overseas during the Vietnam War between 1965 and 1969. During World War II they were one of the most highly decorated Marine squadrons and downed 124 enemy aircraft during the Okinawa campaign. During the Korean conflict, a Snake Corsair shot down a North Korean MIG-15 in aerial combat.

The Ghosts were commanded by LTCOL Gary Braun and were last deployed overseas in 1972 when they made a Mediterranean cruise in USS Forrestal (XXX). The squadron saw action in Vietnam deploying to DaNang in 1965. In 1978, the Ghosts received the Hanson Award in recognition of being the best fighter squadron in the Marine Corps.

CVW-14’s attack and early warning squadrons (VA-27, VA-97, VA-196 and VAW-113) have been with the wing for several years and made the USS Enterprise cruise. VA-27, commanded by Commander John McGrath, flew the A-7E Corsair II. VA-96, commanded by Commander Tom Woodka, flew the A-6F Intruder and VAW-113 under the command of Commander Dieter Olsen, flew the E-2B Hawkeye. Rounding out the air wing were VFP-63 Detachment 2’s RF-8G’s under the OinC, LCDR W. H. Reidelberger and HC-1 Detachment 3’s SH-3H’s with LCDR Richard Sadlier as OinC.

On 5 August 1964, while onboard the USS Constellation (CV-64), CVW-14 conducted the first retaliatory air strikes against North Vietnam.

On 27 January 1973, CVW-14 squadrons also flew the last sorties of the Vietnam War, aboard the USS Enterprise.” (Ref. 3-Publication of the Tailhook Association, Volume 7, Number 3)

Phalanx Close-In Weapons System (CIWS) mounts was in place prior to “Westpac.”

USS CORAL SEA (CV-43) with CVW-14 (13 Nov 1979 to 11 Jun 1980)

VMFA-323 Death Rattlers – Combat Squadron flew McDonnell-Douglas - Phantom II Jet Fighter - NK100 (C) on the F-4N http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980f4vmfa323.jpg

VMFA-531 Grey Ghosts – Combat Squadron flew the McDonnell-Douglas - Phantom II Jet Fighter - NK200 (TC) on the F-4N http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980f4vmfa531.jpg

VA-97 Warhawks – Attack Squadron flew the Vought - Corsair II – Jet attack aircraft - NK300 (TC) on the A-7E http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980a7va97.jpg

VA-27 Royal Maces – Attack Squadron flew the Vought - Corsair II – Jet attack aircraft - NK400 (TC) on the A-7E http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980a7va27.jpg

VA-196 Main Battery or Devil Spades – Attack Squadron flew the Grumman - Intruder - Jet Attack Bomber - Tanker - NK500 (TC) on the A-6E/A6-E/KA-6D http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980a6va196.jpg

VAW-113 Black Eagles - Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron flew the Grumman Hawkeye eqquiped wth Electronics - NK600 (TC) on the E-2B http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980e2vaw113.jpg

*VFP-63 DET 2 Eyes of the Fleet - Light Photographic Reconnaissance Squadron flew the Vought Crusader – Jet Fighter - Reconnaissance - NK620 (TC) on the RF-8G http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980f8vfp63.jpg

HC-1 DET 3 Pacific Fleet Angels - Helicopter Combat Support Squadron flew the Sikorsky Sea King – Anti-submarine - NK720 (TC) on the SH-3G http://www.usscoralsea.net/images/7980h3hc1.jpg

(Ref. 34, 35, 39, 41 & 76)
(*1) disestablished on Mar.1, 1978
(*2) disestablished on Mar.1, 1978
VFP or VF(P) - Light Photographic Reconnaissance Squadron or Photographic Reconnaissance Squadron or Photographic Reconnaissance Squadron (Light) or Light Photographic Squadron.

References: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/index_files/page0012.htm

Photos of Marine and Navy Aircraft during 1979/80 that flew onboard USS Coral Sea (CV-43) http://www.usscoralsea.net/pages/lnr70s.html

or the example Photo History of the MAILCALLS greates collections of the Picture Gallery maintained at World War II Posters, Aircraft from the past to the present, Helicopters, Ships, Subs & Military Equipment http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/896131.aspx or “Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” (1980) http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/905345.aspx

VMFA-323 Death Rattlers and VMFA-531 Grey Ghosts 79/80 CV-43 cruise http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=10068

Aircraft of Uss Coral Sea (CV-43) and Nimitz: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/index_files/page0005.htm

Photos of Ships during 79/80 Cruise: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/index_files/page0008.htm

“On 18 November 1979, USS Midway (CV-41) arrived in the northern part of the Arabian Sea in connection with the continuing hostage crisis in Iran. Militant followers of the Ayatollah Khomeini, who had come to power following the overthrow of the Shah, seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran on 4 November and held 63 U.S. citizens hostage. Spokesmen for the mob demanded that the United States return to Iran the deposed Shah who was in a New York hospital at the time” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk).

“On 19 November, the Iranians occupying the Teheran embassy free three American hostages: a woman and two black Marines. Ten more of the Americans are freed the following day” (Ref. 1- Constellation).

Hawaii

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) was ordered to enter Hawaii the morning of the 21st of November 1979, in order to take on needed supplies and provisions. The crew wasn’t allowed liberty. Coral Sea would depart within seven hours for “Westpac” to support National Security Policy off the coast of Korea. The men of the Coral Sea demonstrated their devotion to duty by rapidly loading fuel, food and other supplies as well as make needed repairs to the ship and exited Pearl Harbor in six and one half hours ready to carry out the policies of our government. I saw the leopard colonies for the first time in my life. I had always thought the disease was no longer a threat to civilization” (Ref. 2).
While in port the Admiral allowed me to print 250-copies of my 103-page book. I only had 6-hours to finish the Xeroxing. I stored Energy Quest books in the Print Shop, as there was limited space in the Operations Department Office.

“USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) cruise was extended two and a half months to support contingency operations in the North Arabian Sea during the Iranian hostage crisis. On 21 November, Kitty Hawk and her escort ships were directed to sail to the Indian Ocean to join USS Midway (CV-41) and her escort ships, which were operating in the northern Arabian Sea” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk).

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) encountered high winds on 24 November 1979 and those of us whose birthday was the 24th, lost it due to crossing the International Date Line. By an international agreement you automatically loose a day when you cross the line heading west and you regain it when you head east” (Ref. 2).

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) spent a couple of days operating off Guam, occasionally getting to see the main island” (Ref. 2).

“Jimmy Carter gives a press conference on the 24th day of Americans being held hostage in Iran November 28, 1979” (Ref. 12).

“In December 1979, the wife of the senior foreign officer being held hostage, Penelope Laingen, tied a yellow ribbon around a tree on the lawn of her Maryland home. Yellow ribbons sprouted all over the country, and the song "Tie a Yellow Ribbon Round the Ole Oak Tree" was revived with a new meaning that helped unite the country against Khomeini” (Ref. 5 CNN Interactive).

“USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) arrived on station on 3 December 1979, and with USS Midway (CV-41) provided the U.S. with A-6 Intruder and A-7 Corsair II attack aircraft and F-4 Phantom and the modern F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft, which could respond to a variety of situations if called upon during the Iranian hostage crisis. This was the first time since World War II that the U.S. Navy had two carrier task forces in the Indian Ocean in response to a crisis situation” Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk).

“USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) arrived on station on 3 December 1979, and with USS Midway (CV-41) provided the U.S. with A-6 Intruder and A-7 Corsair II attack aircraft and F-4 Phantom and the modern F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft, which could respond to a variety of situations if called upon during the Iranian hostage crisis. This was the first time since World War II that the U.S. Navy had two carrier task forces in the Indian Ocean in response to a crisis situation” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk).

“In December 1979, the wife of the senior foreign officer being held hostage, Penelope Laingen, tied a yellow ribbon around a tree on the lawn of her Maryland home. Yellow ribbons sprouted all over the country, and the song "Tie a Yellow Ribbon Round the Ole Oak Tree" was revived with a new meaning that helped unite the country against Khomeini” (Ref. 5 CNN Interactive).

On 8 December 1980 while steaming to Pusan, Korea, departing Hawaii several days earlier, we heard that John Lennon died at the age of 40, being shot down by an unknown assailant in New York.

Pusan, Korea 10 to 12 December 1979

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) arrived at Pusan, Korea, 10 December 1979. The crew was given liberty and we spent several days in Pusan, Korea. The ship was anchored and we went to shore aboard an Amphibious Landing Craft. Several months earlier, my uncle, Loyd Henion, had visited Soul Korea on official business. As the Economic Financial Planner and Manager for the Oregon Department of Transportation, he was there to assist the Korean Transportation Department with their interstate highway development. We only spent a couple of days in Pusan, Korea.

“On 14 December 1979, USS Independence (CV-62) with CVW-6 embarked arrived Norfolk, Virginia, ending her 14th Mediterranean Sea deployment operating with the Sixth Fleet, her first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment during the Iranian Hostage Crisis operating with the 7th Fleet. Steaming home via her fourth transit through the Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, Suez Canal, traveling through the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic, Independence visited Genoa, Italy. Reclassified to CV-62 - "Multi-purpose Aircraft Carrier" 28 February 1973; made one Vietnam Combat cruise during the Vietnam Conflict/War and first deployment operating with the 7th Fleet, earning 1 battle stars for service in Vietnam, returning from the South China Sea off the coast of Vietnam, via the straits of Malacca, Indian Ocean, Arabian Sea on her second Suez Canal transit steaming from the Gulf of Aden, Red Sea, to and from the Mediterranean Sea 10 May 1965; ending her third Mediterranean Sea deployment operating with the Sixth Fleet in support of President John F. Kennedy's firm stand on Berlin during a reoccurrence of stress in a critical area, on her fourth deployment. Her 18th deployment ended (28 June 1979 to 14 December 1979), since her commission as a Forrestal Class Attack Aircraft Carrier at the Brooklyn Naval Shipyard, New York, 10 January 1959” (Ref. 1 Independence, 72 & 325).

Subic Bay, Republic of the Philippines

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) arrived at Subic Bay, Republic of Philippines 20 December 1979.

“On 22 December 1979, Captain Richard M Dunleavy, USN relieved Captain Stanley R. Arthur USN as USS Coral Sea (CV-43) CO to become the first Naval Flight Officer in history to command an aircraft carrier. Captain Arthur was assigned duty with Commander in Chief of the U. S. Pacific Fleet in Hawaii. Commander Curtain, USN, the Operations Department Head and my boss while assigned to the Operations Department, would be frocked to Captain and assume duties as the XO.

“Jimmy Carter calls for sanctions against Iran to force the release of American hostages and reads from Longfellow's poem I heard the bells on Christmas day December 21, 1979” (Ref. 12).

“On 21 December 1979, the Defense Department announced a three-ship nuclear-powered carrier battle group from the Sixth Fleet would deploy to the Indian Ocean to relieve the Seventh Fleet carrier battle group led by USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63)” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk & 72).

“The 6th Fleet carrier battle group consisted of the nuclear-powered USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and her nuclear-powered escort ships. However, on Christmas Eve, 24 December 1979, a massive Soviet airlift of 5,000 Russian airborne troops and equipment into the Afghanistan capital of Kabul was conducted. The U.S. protested the large influx of Soviet troops which the Soviet Union claimed were there at the request of the Afghanistan government” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk & 72).

“On 27 December 1979, a Soviet-backed coup installed a new president in Afghanistan. Two carrier task forces centering around USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and USS Midway (CV-41) continued contingency operations in the northern Arabian Sea” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk).

Two carrier task forces centering around USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and USS Midway (CV-41) continued contingency operations in the northern Arabian Sea” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk).

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) departed Subic Bay, Republic of Philippines 9 January 1980 and steamed for Pattaya Beach, Thailand.

“Jimmy Carter stands firm on embargo against the Russians 13 January 1980” (Ref. 12).

Pattaya Beach, Thailand

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) arrived Thailand 18 January 1980, having departed Subic Bay, Republic of Philippines 9 January 1980. Departing two days later on the 20th for Singapore. Pattaya Beach, Thailand was charming. We went to shore in small canoe type boats that would come alongside the carrier, requiring us to climb down ladders. The captain of theses canoes propelled and steered the boat by lifting the shaft from the water, placing the propeller back in the water to the starboard or port side of the stern. Speedboat Para sailing was really popular.

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) Co, Captain Dunleavy announced to the crew he did not want anyone Para sail gliding. There’s always someone who pushes things to the limit. One sailor Para sailed all around the Carrier. The Captain ordered the Master-At-Arms “Shore Patrol” to arrest him when he came ashore. Captains Mast was convened and this guy was busted.

“USS Nimitz (CVN-65) and her escort ships joined USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and USS Midway (CV-41) and their escort ships on station in the Arabian Sea on 22 January 1980. The following day Kitty Hawk departed for Subic Bay, R.P., having spent 64 days in operations connected with the Iranian crisis. For their actions in the region, Kitty Hawk and CVW-15 sailors and officers were awarded the Navy Expeditionary Medal” (Ref. 1- Kitty Hawk).

“On January 21, 1981, Jimmy Carter speaks bitterly on the behavior of the Iranians in an interview before boarding a plane for Germany to meet with the hostages” (Ref. 12).

“Jimmy Carter's State of the Union Address 23 January 1980, with an introduction by Tip O'Neill January 23, 1980. Reactions and discussion to President Carter's State of the Union Address, by Richard Valeriani, John Palmer, David Brinkley, Carole Simpson, Robert Byrd, and Ted Stevens. Broadcast on NBC TV” (Ref. 12).

“Reactions and discussion to President Carter's State of the Union Address, by Richard Valeriani, John Palmer, David Brinkley, Carole Simpson, Robert Byrd, and Ted Stevens January 23, 1980. Broadcast on NBC TV” (Ref. 12).

Singapore

Only five days out of Thailand, USS Coral Sea (CV43) pulled into Singapore Bay for a four-day rest and relaxation liberty on the 25th of January 1980, departing on the 29th, the crew quickly got underway with operations. I met real nice people at a Seventh Day Adventist Church and was ntroduced to Pigeon Plato Apartment Complexes. There werer pirated cassette tapes and records in the city street markets to be found and just about anything else money colud buy.

On January 30th, USS Coral Sea (CV43) was in the OPAREA just east of Singapore where the ship crossed deck with the USS Kitty Hawk (CV-43). This was a major cross decking for loading of weapons, all variety of needed supplies, and mail. Also on this same day, Coral Sea passed over the equator. The Shellback initiation was held off until the 2nd of February, due to the supplies from the cross decking on the flight deck. On January 31st, Coral Sea was heading through the Malacca Straits, and then on track to the Indian Ocean.

“Republican response to the State of the Union Address 1980. With John Tower, Bill Young, Jake Garn, William Clements, Rudy Boshwitz, William Roth, and William Brock January 30, 1980. Broadcast on CBS-TV” (Ref. 12).

Impervim Neptvini Rergis

On February 2, 1980 approximately 5° north of the equator, USS Coral Sea (CV-43) entered the IMPERVIM NEPTVINI REGIS. His Royal Highness boarded the Coral Sea to carry out the traditional initiation of the land-lubbing Pollywogs, those who have not crossed the equator, into his domain. We took a day off in order for veteran sailors to initiate those of us who had never before crossed the equator. The temperature outside was in the hundreds and on the flight deck 110 degrees.

Upon King Neptune’s arrival he was greeted by Captain, Richard Dunleavy, and given a royal welcome to the Coral Sea. In private conversation, the King was overheard saying to a Trusty Shellback (one who has already crossed the equator into the world of King Neptune), “My mission aboard Coral Sea is to make these, the lowest of my subjects, a part of my Royal Domain, but not to do any bodily harm to them.”

The initiation ceremonies were ordered to begin. With that, the Pollywogs were instructed to shift to the uniform of the day, which consisted of a reversed and inside out pair of pants and a T-shirt worn the same way.

The preparation to mold each division into a respective unit was as diversified as the imagination of the Shellback in charge. Upon assembly of the Pollywogs, the procession was taken up to the flight deck by division. Since my division consisted of three we joined the Operation Specialist Division (CIC Operators). Shellbacks used a few feet of fire hose in order to spank us every time we tried to get up off the hot deck. Lying on our stomachs on the elevator until the elevator reached the flight deck seemed like forever.

Once on the flight deck we were told to craw on our stomachs straddling the catapult steel runner while the Royal hose team sprayed water on us or Shellbacks dumped liquid slop on our heads.

We crawled a fair distance before we entered many obstacles. The first obstacle was the Royal Baby. We were told to kiss the Royal Babies big belly, a belly with grease on it. My beard was covered with grease as the Chief grabbed my head and really rubbed my face in his grease filled baby. Another obstacle was a mid evil torture device made out of wood. I was lucky enough to skip this obstacle but others were not. They would lock your head in a forward down position and your arms were stretched out and locked down. Shellbacks would then spank you with a few feet of fire hose and throw liquid slop on you.

During this initiation Shellbacks would constantly ask us “What are you”? If you didn’t say “Pollywog” Shellbacks would spank you with a few feet of fire hose and throw liquid slop on you.

As we crawled our way down the flight deck once we passed through the obstacles, our last obstacle was an eight feet metal container full of liquid slop. We were told to sit in this tank while to our surprise one of the Chief Shellbacks would dunk us in this liquid slop. When we came up for air, he would ask us “What are you”? I guess I was a little slow to catch on, so I shouted out “Pollywog” Chief. The Chief dunked me again. When I came up for air again, the Chief asked me “what are you”? Louder I answered “Pollywog” Chief. Once again the Chief dunked me and when I came up for air the Chief asked me “What are you”? I answered “A pissed off sailor” and then I pulled the Chief in the tank with me. The Chief couldn’t stop laughing and told me I was supposed to say Shellback. I felt like a bumbling edit but one thing for sure, I wasn’t about to be dunked again.

During the initiation Shellbacks would ask us “what are you”? If we didn’t answer “Pollywog” Shellbacks would spank us with a few feet of fire hose and throw liquid slop on us, so I thought we were suppose to say “Pollywog” to the end.

At the end of the ceremony I had to shave my beard. The Navy had announced that Petty Officer Second Class and above were allowed to have a beard so it was time to shave anyway but the grease didn’t do much for a beard.

We were all given a certificate and became Shellbacks. Since the days of John Paul, Jones, the Father of the U. S. Navy, the same questions have been asked, and in most cases the same answer has been ascertained. Times change, but the sailor is the same. A special few cross that geographic line and enter the realm of King Neptune and become as well as their predecessors, “SHELLBACKS”.

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) with CVW-14 Air Wing and COMCARGROUP THREE embarked, was in the North Arabian Sea on Gonzo Station 4 February 1980, having been established following the November 1979 takeover of the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran” (Ref. 1- Constellation & 72).

“On 4 February 1980, USS Coral Sea (CV-43) cross-decked with USS Midway (CV-41), transferring supplies and crossing the two E-2B aircraft. A turn over brief was also conducted between both ship’s officers (Ref. 2-USS Coral Sea “Welcome Aboard Brochure/March 1980-Vol 8; No. 2).

“After leaving Singapore, USS Coral Sea (CV-43) was at sea for 8-days at the time she relieved USS Midway (CVW-41) in the northern part of the Arabian Sea on 5 February 1980 in connection with the continuing hostage crisis in Iran” (Ref. 2-USS Coral Sea “Welcome Aboard Brochure/March 1980-Vol 8; No. 2).

“On 20 February 1980, USS Midway (CV-41) with Carrier Air Wing Five (CVW-5) embarked arrived Yokosuka, Japan (NAF Atsugi, Japan), ending her 19th deployment, as the U. S. Navy’s forward-deployed carrier operating with the 7th Fleet, her fourth Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea deployment ended. Arriving in the northern part of the Arabian Sea in connection with the continuing hostage crisis in Iran on 18 November 1979, joined 21 November 1979 by USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63), and both carriers, along with their escort ships, were joined by the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) and her escorts on 22 January 1980, continuing operations until relieved by USS Coral Sea (CV-43) on 5 February 1980. Reclassified to CV-41 30 June 1975; made nine “Westpacs” and one while forward deployed; made three Vietnam Combat cruises operating with the 7th Fleet during the Vietnam Conflict/War; ending her eighth “Westpac” deployment operating with the Pacific Fleet and tour of duty with the 7th Fleet, on her third South China Sea deployment, her third Vietnam combat cruise in the Far . Her 21st deployment since her second recommission 31 January 1970 ended, following completion of a four-year conversion-modernization at the San Francisco Bay Naval Shipyard, having arrived 11 February 1966. Her 27th deployment since her first recommission upon completion of a overall (SCB-110) at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton Washington (August 1955 to 30 September 1957) ended; decommissioning in August 1955 when she arrived at Bremerton Washington upon completion of her World Cruise, on her 11th deployment (27 December 1954 to 14 July 1955), the first operation of ships of her class in the western Pacific, joining the 7th Fleet 6 February 1955 conducting operations in the Western Pacific and in waters off Taiwan, remaining with the 7th Fleet until 28 June 1955, sailing via the Cape of Good Hope for Taiwan upon departure from Norfolk, Va., operating with the United States Atlantic Command under the direction of the 2nd Fleet from 7 November 1945 to 6 February 1955, during which time and prior to her transfer to the Pacific Fleet from the Atlantic Fleet Command, Midway made one Northern and one Western deployment (2nd Fleet), seven Mediterranean Sea deployments operating with the 6th Fleet, one Southern Atlantic and Caribbean Sea Shakedown cruise operating with the Atlantic Fleet under the direction of the 8th Fleet (7 November 1945 to 2 January 1946), on her first deployment; reclassified CVA-41 on 1 October 1952. Her 39th deployment ended (30 September 1979 to 20 February 1980), since her commission 10 September 1945, having the destination of being the lead ship of her class, and the first to be commissioned after the end of World War II” (Ref. 1- Midway & 72).

“USS Midway (CV-41) with Carrier Air Wing Five (CVW-5) embarked conducted Fleet Activities Yokosuka, Japan (NAF Atsugi, Japan) February to May 1980” (Ref. 72).

USS Midway (CV-41) with CVW-5 (Feb to May 1980)

“On 25 February 1980, USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) with CVW-15 embarked arrived San Diego, Ca., ending her 12th “Westpac” deployment operating with the Pacific Fleet and tour of duty with the 7th Fleet, which included Vietnamese search and assistance operations ordered by then-Commander-in-Chief, President Jimmy Carter, to aid Vietnamese refugees who were attempting to escape the Socialist Republic of Vietnam via small boats, followed with new orders for Kitty Hawk and her escort ships to operate south of the Korean peninsula in response to the assassination of South Korean President Park Chung Hee on 26 October 1979, followed by a two-and-a-half month deployment extension to support contingency operations in the North Arabian Sea during the Iranian hostage crisis, on her first Indian Ocean deployment to join USS Midway (CV-41) and her escort ships which were operating in the northern Arabian Sea, her first Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment, arriving in the northern part of the Arabian Sea in connection with the continuing hostage crisis in Iran, arriving on station 3 December, and the two carrier forces provided the U.S. with A-6 Intruder and A-7 Corsair II attack aircraft and F-4 Phantom and the modern F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft, which could respond to a variety of situations if called upon during the Iranian hostage crisis, becoming the first time since World War II that the U.S. Navy had two carrier task forces in the Indian Ocean in response to a crisis situation, while two weeks later, on 21 December 1979, the Defense Department announced a three-ship nuclear-powered carrier battle group from the Sixth Fleet would deploy to the Indian Ocean to relieve the Seventh Fleet carrier battle group led by Kitty Hawk, when on 27 December 1979, a Soviet-backed coup installed a new president in Afghanistan, while both carriers continued contingency operations in the northern Arabian Sea until 23 January 1980, when Kitty Hawk and her battle group were relieved by USS Nimitz (CVN-68) and her escort ships, having joined Kitty Hawk and USS Midway (CV-41) and their escort ships on station in the Arabian Sea on 22 January 1980, departing for Subic Bay, R.P., on the 23rd, by the time she made it to port, had spent 64 days in operations connected with the Iranian crisis, and for the actions of Kitty Hawk and CVW-15 sailors and officers, they were awarded the Navy Expeditionary Medal; reclassified a CV-3 “Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier” on 29 April 1973; made six Vietnam Combat cruises during the Vietnam Conflict/War operating with the 7th Fleet; awarded a Presidential Unit Citation, a Meritorious Service Commendation, four Navy Unit Commendations, a Battle Efficiency "E" and many other unit awards. Her 14th deployment ended (30 May 1979 to 25 February 1980), since her commission 29 April 1961” (Ref. 1-Kitty Hawk & 72).

“USS Constellation (CV-64) (Connie) with CVW-9 embarked departed San Diego, Calif. 26 February 1980, on her 12th “Westpac” deployment operating with the Pacific Fleet and tour of duty with the 7th Fleet in the far east, on her second Indian Ocean and first Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment (2nd voyage). Prior to her deployment completed a relatively short eight-month turnaround cycle, commencing upon return from her 11th “Westpac” deployment. Ending her 11th “Westpac” deployment operating with the Pacific Fleet and tour of duty with the 7th Fleet in the far east, on her 9th South China Sea South deployment, her first Indian Ocean deploymenmt and first Gulf of Aden via the Arabian Sea deployment. Reclassified to CV-56 1 July 1975; made seven Vietnam Combat cruises during the Vietnam Conflict/War, received a Presidential Unit Citation from President Nixon in 1973; making two deployments operating with the United States Atlantic Command under the direction of the 2nd Fleet, ending her second deployment after a two-month trip and home port transfer steaming in the Western/Southern Atlantic via Mayport, Fla., where she embarked some squadrons from CVG-5 steaming in the Eastern and Southern Pacific around Cape Horn to her new home port of San Diego, Calif., operating with the Pacific Fleet. She will under go her 14th deployment since she was commissioned 27 October 1961” (Ref. 1- Constellation & 72).

USS Constellation (CV-64) with CVW-9 (26 Feb to 15 Oct 1980)

Iran History & Air Arm - Iran hostage crisis Continues (February to 31 March 1980)

“Demands announced in February 1980 were the return of the shah to Iran for trial, the return of the shah's wealth to the Iranian people, an admission of guilt by the United States for its past actions in Iran, plus an apology and a promise not to interfere in Iran's affairs in the future.

These were clearly unacceptable demands, especially the first one, as the shah had left the United States in December 1978 to take up residence in Panama. In response to the demands, diplomatic ties with Iran were severed followed by Carter threatening new sanctions against Iran unless some progress was forthcoming” (Ref. 4).

“Several hundred people gathered in front of the Iranian embassy in Washington D.C. shouting "Go Home" and "Let our people go!" Their rage, their very presence seemed to be saying, "We've had enough!" The D.C. police had roped off the sidewalk, ironically providing the Iranian building the very protection the embassy in Iran lacked. Sales of Iranian flags went up across the nation and Americans burned them in protest. Meanwhile, throughout the United States, Iranian students demonstrated in support of their country, denouncing the White House and demanding the shah's immediate extradition. These demonstrations prompted a violent backlash across the nation as anger and frustration had risen as the days passed and the hostages were not released. The crisis instilled a new sense of patriotism as Americans supported the President. Iranian-Americas faced problems that hadn't been seen since Japanese-Americans had been interned during World War II: some were booted out of their jobs; others had their property vandalized; and their children were taunted in school. While the nation poised for action, the administration worked to soothe public passion, fearful the demonstrators might precipitate a riot, which would have been highly publicized in Iran, and might have caused Americans to be harmed in retaliation. News from Iran had already indicated Khomeini's intent to have the hostages tried as spies” (Ref. 4).

“The public was more supportive of Carter than it had been a few months earlier, but was becoming more impatient with each passing week because of the apparent impotence in dealing with international crises. Citizens of all ages who normally paid little attention to foreign affairs sat transfixed in front of their television sets, breathlessly following each new twist and turn of events -- even when not much was happening, which was usually the case. Television quickly domesticated the foreign scenes and characters by bringing them into the intimacy of our living rooms.

“President Carter repeatedly met with the families of the hostages; he confessed to reporters that virtually his every waking moment was spent worrying about the fate of the captives” (Ref. 4).

“During the first few months of the siege, about one-third of the three network s weeknight newscast time was devoted to the hostage story. ABC even created a regular thirty-minute nightly program The Crisis in Iran: America Held Hostage, which premiered on Day 5 of the crisis and promised to broadcast as long as the crisis lasted” (Ref. 4).

“By March 1980, ABC executives responded to the early success of this news special at eleven-thirty P.M. by creating a regular news program, Nightline, which focused on major news events, including the hostage crisis. On Day 74, CBS anchor Walter Chronkite concluded his nightly news broadcast by announcing the number of days the hostages had been held captive, and maintained that practice until the end of the crisis” (Ref. 4).

US Boycotts Moscow Olympics – 21 March 1980
As if there wasn’t enough to worry about, tensions between the two super powers of the world resulted in the U.S. announcing it would boycott Moscow Olympics, March 21, 1980. “Citing the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, President Carter tells a group of American athletes that the U.S. won't be sending a team to the 1980 Olympics in Moscow. Later in the month, President Carter orders the U.S. secretary of commerce to ban all exports to the Soviet Union "of any goods or technology" related to the games, further encouraging other nations to join a U.S.-led boycott” (Ref. 5-CNN Interactive).

Pre-revolutionIIAF -Imperial Iranian Air Force (mid '20s-feb79)IIAA - Imperial Iranian Army Aviation, IIAA (-feb79)IIN - Imperial Iranian Navy (-feb79)

Iran History & Air Arm

Pre-revolutionIIAF -Imperial Iranian Air Force (mid '20s-feb79)IIAA - Imperial Iranian Army Aviation, IIAA (-feb79)IIN - Imperial Iranian Navy (-feb79)

“By 1979, up to 160 to 300 F-16A/Bs, seven Boeing E-3A AWACS aircraft and other assets were on order, negotiations for 75 more F-14As were due to start, and the IIAF was also to build the most comprehensive training installations outside the USA, very similar to those used for the Red Flag exercises. Training began with a fast pace, in the US, and young Iranian officers started undergoing F-16 flying and AWACS control courses” (Ref. 21).

“Under the Shas rule the USA supplied a large number of combat aircraft during the late 1960s and through 1970s. The IIAF took delivery from the USA up to 104 Northrop F-5A/Bs Freedom Fighters, and then continued with purchases of 32 McDonnell Douglas F-4D Phantom’s (first examples were delivered in March of 1971), 177 to 208/9 to 223 to 225 F-4E Phantom fighter-bomber’s (plus eight F-4Es borrowed from the USA and subsequently returned), 140 to 165 to 185 F-5E fighters, at least 20 RF-4Es (only 16 of which were delivered officially), and 79 to 80 Grumman F-14As, as well as a large fleet of Boeing 707-3J9C tankers, Lockheed C-130E/H Hercules transports, and a number of Boeing 747-2J9C strategic transports” (Ref. 16, 19, 21, 22 & 27).

“Despite having only 450 combat aircraft, bases and facilities built in Iran could easily accommodate and support as many as 3,000 fighter and support aircraft” (Ref. 21).

“The Imperial Iranian Air Force was the largest overseas operators of the F-4 Phantom before the Revolution” (Ref. 20).

“Numbering some 40,000 officers and men in 1973, the air force had grown to 100,000 in 1979 and was expected to grow further by 1980. Air force headquarter was located at Doshan-Tappeh, near Tehran, and major bases were spread throughout the western half of the country. The principal base, Mehrabad AFB (occupying the southern section of Tehran International Airport) was the largest air base in the Middle East. In mid-1970s the IIAF airbase structure was consist of a number of Tactical Air Bases which were numbered”: (Ref. 22).

The Imperial Iranian Air Force (IIAF) bases: (As of Late 1979) - (Ref. 19)

1st Tactical Air Base, Tehran (Mehrabad)
11Th. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
12Th. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
13Th. Combat Instructor School (CIS) F-4E
11Th. Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron RF-4E + RF-5 + RT-33
11Th. Tactical Transport Squadron (T.T.SQ.) C-130
12Th. Tactical Transport Squadron (T.T.SQ.) C-130
707 Squadron B-707 Tanker / Transport
747 Squadron B-747 Tanker / Transport
F-27 Squadron
F-27 Friendship Transport (was in Doshan Tappeh)
11Th. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33 & L-20
2nd Tactical Air Base, Tabriz
21st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
22nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
23rd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
21st. Counter Insurgency Squadron O–2A
21st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
3rd Tactical Air Base, Hamadan (Shahrokhi)
31st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
32nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
33rd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
34Th. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
31Th. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
4th Tactical Air Base, Dezfull (Vahdati)
41st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
42nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
43rd. Tactical Fighter Training Squadron (T.F.T.SQ.) F-5E
41Th. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33 & L-20
5th Tactical Air Base, Agha Jari (Omidieh)
51st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
52nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
53 rd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
51st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
6th Tactical Air Base, Bushehr
61st. Tactical Fighter Training Squadron (T.F.T.SQ.) F-4E
62nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
63rd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) 32 F-4D
6st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
7th Tactical Air Base, Shiraz
71st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
72nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-14
73rd. Tactical Fighter Training Squadron (T.F.T.SQ.) F-14
71st. Tactical Transport Squadron (T.T.SQ.) C-130
72nd. Tactical Transport Squadron (T.T.SQ.) C-130
71st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
8th Tactical Air Base, Isfahan ( Khatami )
81st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-14
82nd. Tactical Fighter Training Squadron (T.F.T.SQ.) F-14
81st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
9th Tactical Air Base, Bandar Abbas
91st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
92nd. Tactical Squadron (T.SQ.) P-3F Orion
91st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33
10th Tactical Air Base, Chabahar
101st. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-5E
102nd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
103 rd. Tactical Fighter Squadron (T.F.SQ.) F-4E
101st. Search and Rescue SquadronSupport Squadron F-33

Other Air Bases

Tehran: Doshan Tapeh Air Base - (Air force headquarters and the IIAF`s training facility).
Tehran: Galeh Morghi Air Base
Tehran: Ghasreh Firuzeh Air Base - (Air force Depot)
Mashhad: Air Base” (Ref. 22).

Notes:

There was always one Squadron of F-5 or F-4 in Mashhad.Each of 11 F–5 E Squadron had over 18 Aircraft (could form 15 SQ) Each of 12 F-4 E Squadron had over 15 Aircraft (Could form 16 SQ)Each of 4 F–14 Squadron had 20 Aircraft (Could form 7 SQ.)
**** Each and every Air Base had a Search and Rescue Squadron Plus a support squadron equipped with F-33 Bonanza Aircraft” (Ref. 19). http://www.iiaf.net/history/tactair.html

Post-revolution

IRIAF - Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (feb79 - current)
IRIAA - Islamic Republic of Iran Army Aviation (feb79 - current)
IRINA - Islamic Republic of Iranian Navy Aviation (feb79- current)
IRGCAF - Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Air Force (Pasdaran-e Inqilab)
IRGCN - Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy” (Ref. 22). http://iiarmy.topcities.com/army/Air/air.html

IIAF F-4 Phantom serial Numbers:

67-14869/14876 McDonnell F- 4D-35-MC Phantom; 67-14877/14884 McDonnell F- 4D-36-MC Phantom; 68-6904/6911 McDonnell F- 4D-37-MC Phantom; 68-6912/6919 McDonnell F- 4D-38-MC Phantom; 69-7711/7726 McDonnell F- 4E-46-MC Phantom; 69-7727/7742 McDonnell F- 4E-47-MC Phantom; 71-1094/1101 McDonnell F- 4E-51-MC Phantom; 71-1102/1115 McDonnell F- 4E-52-MC Phantom; 71-1116/1129 McDonnell F- 4E-53-MC Phantom; 71-1130/1142 McDonnell F- 4E-54-MC Phantom; 71-1143/1152 McDonnell F- 4E-55-MC Phantom; 71-1153/1166 McDonnell F- 4E-56-MC Phantom; 72-0266/0269 McDonnell RF- 4E-48-MC Phantom; 73-1519/1534 McDonnell F- 4E-57-MC Phantom; 73-1535/1549 McDonnell F- 4E-58-MC Phantom; 73-1550/1554 McDonnell F- 4E-59-MC Phantom; 74-1725/1728 McDonnell RF- 4E-61-MC Phantom; and 74-1729/1736 McDonnell RF- 4E-62-MC Phantom’s” (Ref. 19). http://www.iiaf.net/aircraft/jetfighters/F4/f4.html

Specification for Mc Donnell Douglas F-4 PHANTOM II

Type: multi-role fighter

Performance: combat radius 786 miles; top speed 1585 mph; ceiling 62000 feet

Power plant: two General Electric J79-GE-17A turbojets rated at 11810 lbs thrust each dry; 17900 with afterburner

Armament: one M61 20mm cannon w/ 640 rds, maximum ordnance 16000 lbs, including bombs, missiles, AIM-7Sparrow, AIM-9 Sidewinder, Maverick and AAMs” (Ref. 19).

Because of the Iranian revolution in 1979, the U. S. canceled orders by the Iran government on 160 F-16s; 75-0222/0257 McDonnell F- 4E-63-MC Phantom’s; 78-0751/0754 McDonnell RF- 4E Phantom’s; 78-0788 McDonnell RF- 4E Phantoms’ and 8-0854/0864 McDonnell RF- 4E” (Ref. 19).

IIAF had about 500 combat aircraft in: (Ref. 22)
10 fighter bomber squadrons
10 fighter-ground attack squadrons
4 fighter squadrons
1 reconnaissance squadron
1 air tanker squadron
4 medium transoprt squadrons
4 light transoprt squadrons
3 SAM battalions
80 Grumman F-14A (Tomcat) Fighter
32 McDonnel Douglas F-4D (Phantom II) Fighter/Bomber
177 McDonnel Douglas F-4E (Phantom II) Fighter/Bomber
16 McDonnel Douglas RF-4E (Phantom II) Reconnaissance
12 Northrop F-5A (Tiger) Fighter
141 Northrop F-5E (Tiger II) Fighter
28 Northrop F-5B/F (Tiger II) Trainer
5 Northrop RF-5F (Tiger II) Reconnaissance
10 Beech F-33A (Bonaza) Trainer
39 Beech F-33C (Bonaza) Trainer
25 Lockheed T-33A (Shooting Star) Trainer
6 Lockheed P-3F (Orion) Maritime Patrol
15 Lockheed C-130E (Hercules) Cargo/Transport
49 Lockheed C-130H (Hercules) Cargo/Transport
15 Boeing 707-320C Tanker/Cargo/Transport
6 Boeing 747 Tanker/Cargo/Transport
13 Fokker F-27-400M (Troopship) Cargo/Transport
5 Fokker F-27-600 (Friendship) Cargo/Transport
4 Fokker F-28 V.I.P/Transport
3 Rockwell Aero Commander 690A Utility Aircraft
4 Dassault Falcon 20 V.I.P/Utility Aircraft
2 Cessna 310 Utility Aircraft
12 Cessna 337 Utility Aircraft
2 Lockheed JetStar Cargo/Transport
Helicopters:
10 Kaman HH-43F (Huskie)
45 Agusta-Bell AB-205
68 Agusta-Bell AB-206A (JetRanger)
5 Agusta-Bell AB-212
39 Bell 214C
4 Agusta-Boeing Vertol CH-47C (Chinook)
16 Super Frelon
2 Agusta-Sikorsky AS-61A4
Missiles:
AIM-54A Phoenix - (AAM) – 424
AIM-9L Sidewinder - (AAM) - 1666
AIM-7E Sparrow - (AAM) - 948
AGM-65A Maverick - (ASM) - 2500 OR 216
Condor (ASM) – X
AS 12 (ASM) – X
On Order:
160 F-16A (Light fighter/strike)
7 E-3A AWACS (Airborne warning and control ships)
160 F-16A (Light f7 E-3A AWACS (Airborne warning and control ships)
AIM-9L Sidewinder (AAM)” (Ref. 22).

“Both of the orders of 160 to 300 F-16A/Bs and seven Boeing E-3A AWACS aircraft were cancelled after the Islamic revolution in 1979. The sale of the Boeing AWACS to Iran created considerable controversy, because Iran was the first foreign customer for this system, and NATO countries had been unwilling to buy it, because the cost was so high” (Ref. 22).

“Unfortunately, one immediate effect of the cancellation of the Iranian order was that the individual unit cost of the F-16 was driven sharply upward. However, many of the F-16s intended for Iran were eventually sold to Israel” (Ref. 18).

Based on Letters of Intent to Purchase, had the revolution not occurred, 177 to 208/9 to 223 to 225 F-4E Phantom fighter-bomber’s, depending on which source (223 operational Phantom’s of the IIAF could have been, with and additional 306 on order, 529 assorted Phantom’s and 160 F-16’s, totaling 689 jets” (Ref. 16, 19, 20, 21, 22 & 27).

“Following the Islamic revolution, massive numbers of contracts with Western arms suppliers were cancelled by the new government, including an order for 400 AIM-54A Phoenix missiles” (Ref. 28).

Iran History & Air Arm

“As the U. S. Of America prepared to enter the fifth month of the crisis in Iran, President Carter's frustration level grew from the inactivity in the release of the hostages. On April 7, he announced the severing of diplomatic relations with Iran, the implementation of a complete economic embargo against Iran, an inventory of financial claims against Iran to be paid from Iranian assets in the United States, and told Iran's diplomats to leave the country within twenty-four hours.

“The US broke diplomatic relations with Iran on 8 April 1980” (Ref. 11).

“President Carter ordered the Pentagon to prepare a contingency plan for military action to rescue the hostages. The greatest problem was the inaccessibility of the American embassy compound - located more than 600 miles from the nearest operating aircraft carriers and deep within the heavily populated urban center of Tehran” (Ref. 4).

“Carter also gave the approval for a military attempt to rescue the hostages. The fact that a small plane had successfully penetrated Iranian airspace and had examined a potential rescue staging site without being detected, convinced Carter that such a mission was feasible” (Ref. 4).

“The newly certified US Army Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (Airborne) was put on full alert and plans were being drawn up for a rescue” (Ref. 11).

“USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) with CVW-7 embarked departed Norfolk, Virginia 15 April 1980, on her first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment operating with the 7th Fleet, steaming through the Southern Atlantic to the bottom of South Africa and through the Mazambique Channel to the Arabian Gulf operating with the United States Atlantic Command (Atlantic Fleet) under the direction of the 2nd Fleet to the Indian Ocean. Prior to her deployment not reported history from 14 July 1979 to 14 April 1980, with the exception of an F-14 of VF-142 crashing into the sea while attempting to land aboard the Dwight D. Eisenhower on 6 March 1980; made her first deployment on her Mediterranean Sea deployment operating with the 6th Fleet. She will under go her second deployment since her commission 18 October 1977” (Ref. 72 & 383).

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) with CVW-7 (15 Apr to 22 Dec 1980)

“USS South Carolina (CGN 37) joined USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) as part of her task force” (Ref. 84A).

“On 18 April 1980, USS Constellation (CV-64) and her battle group departed Subic Bay, the Republic of the Philippines, to relieve USS Coral Sea (CV-43), steaming westward to the Arabian Sea, where Gonzo Station had been established following the November 1979 takeover of the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran” (Ref. 1- Constellation & 72).

Iran hostage crisis Continues
“As the Iranian hostage crisis drags into its second year, 52 Americans are still held captive by the new regime in Tehran, with no resolution in sight. President Carter's threats and sanctions fail to bring them home, and in April 1980 the administration calls on the military” (Ref. 386).

President Carter, Joint Chiefs and Commanders in the field were convinced the hostages could be rescued without going to war with Iran.

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) with CVW-14 Air Wing and COMCARGROUP THREE embarked, was on "GONZO" Station in the North Arabian Sea and at sea 87 continuous days (29 January to 24 April 1980), when Operation Evening Light in support of the top-secret mission Operation Eagle Claw began at about dawn on 24 April 1980, in connection with the Iranian crisis, operating along side USS Nimitz (CVN 68), with her air wing, while the Nimitz launched eight helicopters sailing in the Arabian Sea off the southeast Coast of Iran for there 600-mle flight to Desert One, the attempt to rescue 52 US Embassy American diplomats held hostage in Tehra,n Iran” (Ref. 4 & 72).
Operation Eagle claw – Mission to Rescue Hostages

Planning a Mission

“Teheran is well inside Iran and away from friendly countries. The hostages were not held at an airport as in Israel's four years earlier Entebbe raid. Good intelligence was hard to come by about forces inside the embassy and in Teheran. And of course, all the planning and training had to be carried out in complete secrecy” (Ref. 11).

“American diplomatic efforts to release the hostages were thwarted by Khomeni supporters. At the same time, Pentagon planners began examining rescue option.

Initially, the preferred solution was the infiltration of the force by trucks from Turkish territory but this plan was rejected due political disadvantages and the risk of a great number of casualties made to discard the possibility of a night paratrooper’s assault so the choice fell again, after all, on the use of helicopters” (Ref. 11).

“For planners, the situation was bleak. Intelligence information was difficult to get. The hostages were heavily guarded in the massive embassy compound. Logistically, Tehran was a city crammed with 4 million people, yet it was very isolated -- surrounded by about 700 miles of desert and mountains in every direction. There was no easy way to get a rescue team into the embassy” (Ref. 4).

“Another scenario was parachuting an elite Army Special Forces team in. The team would fight its way in and out of the embassy, rescuing the hostages along the way. That plan was deemed suicide. After realizing there was no infrastructure or support for a quick strike, planners started mapping out a long-range, multifaceted rescue.” (Ref. 4)

“By December 1979, a rescue force was selected and a training program was under way” (Ref. 11).

The top-secret mission was called Operation Eagle Claw.

Training exercises were conducted through March 1980 and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) approved mission execution on 16 April 1980. Between 19 and 23 April, the forces deployed to Southwest Asia.

What was ultimately decided on was an audacious plan involving all four US armed forces services” (Ref. 11).

“What emerged was a complex, two-night operation. An Army rescue team would be brought into Iran.

Operation Evening Light in support of the top-secret mission Operation Eagle Claw began at about dawn on April 24, 1980, when eight helicopters were launched from the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) sailing in the Arabian Sea off the southeast Coast of Iran” (Ref. 4).

“HM-16 provided the eight helicopters for Operation Eagle Claw and was on duty until 19 May 1980 when the squadron returned to Norfolk, Virginia, after an unprecedented 193 days continuous at sea.

“Three MC-130E Combat Talon’s "Hercs" would leave Masirah Island, Oman on the evening of 24 April 1980, and fly to a barren spot in the desert of Iran, known as Delta One staging area, several hundred miles southeast of Tehran and offload the Delta force men, Combat Controllers, and translators/truck drivers.

Once on the ground, the rescue team would board the Navy RH-53's of HM-16 USMC crews flying in from USS Nimitz (CVN-68) having flown off the carrier at dawn April 24, 1980” (Ref. 4).

“Three EC-130's following the Combat Talon's would then land and prepare to refuel the Navy RH-53D's with USMC crews of HM-16 flying in from USS Nimitz (CVN-68)” (Ref. 11).

“Once the helicopters were refueled, they would fly the task force forward to meet up with agents already in-country, and hide briefly near the US embassy, aided by several Iranians who had been hired by the CIA, awaiting the assault the next night” (Ref. 4).

“The helicopters would then fly to areas about 50 miles outside Tehran and hide until called by the Delta operators” (Ref. 4 & 11).

“The operation required a total of 12 USAF planes (4 special ops MC-130E Combat Talon, 3 command post EC-130E Commando Solo, 3 gunships AC-130 Spectre, and 2 cargo C-141 Starlifter), and F-14A Tomcat’s, A-6E Intruder’s and A-7E Corsair’s, supplied by the aircraft carriers USS Nimitz (CVN-68) and USS Coral Sea (CV-43) in the Arabian Sea to provide air support.

On the second night, the MC-130's and EC-130's would again fly into the country, this time with 100 US Army Rangers troops, and head for Manzariyeh Air Base, about 40 miles southeast of Tehran. The Army Rangers were to assault the field and hold it so that the two C-141's could land to ferry the hostages back home.

AC-130H Spectre gun ships would be over the embassy and the airfield to "fix" any problems encountered, providing cover for the rangers at Manzariyeh, support Delta's assault, and to suppress any attempts at action by the Iranian Air Force from nearby Mehrabad Airbase” (Ref. 4).

American intelligence agents would escort the Delta team to the embassy in trucks were they were to storm the American embassy, kill whoever tried to stop them, and free the hostages. There, the raiders were to board trucks with the freed prisoners for a further 50-mile trip into Tehran, then rendezvous with the Navy’s RH-53's of HM-16 USMC crews hiding out until ordered to a nearby football stadium. They and the hostages would be flown to Manzariyeh Airfield and the waiting C-141's would fly out of the country. All the aircraft but the eight helicopters would be flown back; the helicopters would be destroyed before leaving” (Ref. 4 & 11).

“Secrecy and surprise were critical to the plan. The entire mission would be done at night, and surprise was the Army shooters' greatest advantage.

It was an ambitious plan; some say too ambitious.

"This mission required a lot of things we had never done before," said retired Col. (then-Capt.) Bob Brenci, the lead C-130 pilot on the mission. "We were literally making it up as we went along."

Flying using night-vision goggles was almost unheard of. There was no capability, or for that matter, a need, to refuel helicopters at remote, inaccessible landing zones. All these skills and procedures would be tested and honed for this mission.

"These capabilities are routine now for special operators, but at the time we were right there on the edge of the envelope," said retired Col. (then-Capt.) George Ferkes, Brenci's co-pilot.

The aircrews weren't the only ones pushing the envelope. Airman First Class Jessie Rowe was a fuels specialist at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., when he got a late night call to pack his bags and show up at the Tampa International Airport. He met his boss, Tech. Sgt. Bill Jerome, and the pair flew to Arizona. They were now a part of Eagle Claw. Their job? Devise a self-contained refueling system the C-130s could carry into the desert to refuel the helicopters at the forward staging area.

"No one told us why," said Rowe, who's now a major at Hurlburt Field and one of just two operation participants still on active duty. "But, you didn't need to be a rocket scientist to figure it out.

"We begged, borrowed and stole the stuff we needed to make it work," he said. "We got it done. In less than a month, we had a working system."

The Eagle Claw players were spread out, training around the world. The Hurlburt crews spent most of their time training in Florida and the southwestern United States. The pieces were coming together. At the same time, negotiations to free the hostages continued to go nowhere. By the time April 1980 rolled around, the Eagle Claw team had been practicing individually, and together, for five months. The aircrews averaged about 1,000 flying hours in that time. In comparison, a typical C-130 crew dog would take three years to log 1,000 hours” (Ref. 9).

Its Showtime

“A month before the assault a CIA Twin Otter had flown to Desert One. A USAF Combat Controller had ridden around the landing area on a light dirt bike and planted landing lights to help guide the force in” (Ref. 11).

“"We were chomping at the bit," Brenci said.”We just wanted to go and do it."

After a long training mission in Arizona and a flight to Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., to pick up parts, Col. J.V.O. Weaver (a captain then) and his crew, returned to Hurlburt Field to an unusual sight.

"We rolled in and noticed the maintenance guys were on the line painting all the birds flat black," Weaver said. "They painted everything. Tail numbers, markings. Everything."

The plan was moving forward. Less than a day later, six C-130s quietly departed Florida bound for Wadi Kena, Egypt. The president hadn't pulled the trigger yet, but the hammer was cocked on the operation.

The Army and Air Force troops were in Egypt awaiting orders. The Marines and sailors, the helicopter contingent, were aboard the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) afloat in the Persian Gulf off the coast of Iran” (Ref. 9).

“The Persian Gulf, also known as the Arabian Gulf, is a 600-mile-long body of water which separates Iran from the Arabian Peninsula, and one of the most strategic waterways in the world due to its importance in world oil transportation. At its narrowest point (the Strait of Hormuz), the Gulf narrows to only 34 miles wide” (Ref. 450).

"I remember we ate C-rats (the predecessor to MREs) for days and then one morning a truck rolls up, and we're served a hot breakfast," Rowe said. "Light bulbs went on in everyone's minds."

The hot breakfast was a precursor to a briefing and pep talk from Army Maj. Gen. James Vaught, the Joint Task Force commander for Eagle Claw. The mission was a go.

"Everyone was pumped up," said retired Chief Master Sgt. Taco Sanchez (then a staff sergeant). "Arms were in the air. We were ready!"

Next stop, Masirah, a tiny island off the coast of Oman. To say this air patch was desolate would be kind. It was a couple of tents and a blacktop strip. It was the final staging area -- the last stop before launching” (Ref. 9).

Not knowing how the Iranian Pilots would conduct themselves in the air in the case of a battle, weighed heavy on the minds of everyone associated with Operation Evening Light in support of Operation Eagle Claw on board both USS Coral Sea (CV-43) and the USS Nimitz (CVN-68). Aircraft from both carriers were armed and stood ready to execute several contingency cover and strike operations in support of aircraft on the ground and in their exit from Iranian air space. On board both carriers in Combat Information Center everyone knew when the first MC-130E Combat Talon’s "Hercs" lifted off from Masirah. The “Hercs” would have to fly in without being detected and the eight helo’s needed for the mission would soon follow” (Ref. 43).

Iran History

“The U.S.-trained Iranian Imperial Air Force was widely regarded as second only to Israel's in the Middle East—more than a match for Iraq and a serious adversary for even the Soviet Union. The Khomeini regime, however, regarded it as a waste of money that rightfully belonged to the mostazafin (poor oppressed masses)

After Khomeini seized power on 11 February 1979, one of the new government's first acts was a purge of the armed forces, particularly the officer corps, which was (probably correctly) thought to be a hotbed of monarchist sentiment. The Air Force, where virtually the entire fighting element—the combat pilots—is composed of officers, was especially hard hit. To make matters worse, Iran's best combat pilots had been trained in the United States and Israel, making them particularly suspect” (Ref. 24).

“Just before sunset on April 24, 1980, Brenci's MC-130 took off toward Desert One. The die was cast. Brenci's crew would be the first to touch down in Iran. They carried the Air Force combat control team and Army Col. Charlie Beckwith's Commandos (Force combat control team) were on board Brenci's MC-130, as was Col. James Kyle, the on-scene commander at Desert One and one of the lead planners for the operation. The other Hercs left Masirah after dark, and the helicopters launched off the Nimitz.

It was a four-hour flight. Plenty of time to contemplate what they were attempting.

Beckwith would lead the rescue mission into the embassy.

"We just tried to stay busy," Sanchez said. "We were in enemy territory now. The pucker factor was pretty high."

The first challenge would be to find the makeshift landing strip. Only 21 days earlier, Maj. John Carney, a combat controller, had flown a covert mission into Iran with the CIA to set up an infrared landing zone at Desert One. Carney was perched over Brenci's shoulder as the C-130 neared the landing site. The lights he had burled in the desert would be turned on via remote control from the C-130's flight deck. The question was would they work?

Brenci was a couple miles out when in slow succession a "diamond-and-one" pattern appeared through his night-vision goggles. The bird touched down in the powdery silt, and the troops went to work” (Ref. 9).

“That insertion went well, with no contact, and the pilots reported that their sensors had picked up some radar signals at 3,000 feet but nothing below that.

Shortly after the lead C-130 landed, a bus came by on a dirt road. Its driver and about 40 passengers were held until the Americans left” (Ref. 11).

The activity of CIC onboard USS CORAL SEA (CV-43) and USS Nimitz (CVN-65) April 24 1980 was fast and furious.

As the Operations Department Yeoman, my duties were vast and although temporarily assigned to Commander Carrier Group Three, I was expected to continue with my regular duties. I received a call from the admiral’s staff while I was typing a message in the Operations Department Office just before dawn on April 24.

We were not yet at General Quarters and it was early in the morning. During the time we were on “GONZO” station, I was lucking to get 4-hours sleep a day. Staying up was normal and this morning was like any other morning with the exception that my General Quarters station would change.

My duties normally during General Quarters was Repair 7 Forward Damage Control Team (forward 02 level hose team) yet temporarily assigned to Commander Carrier Group Three, the Admiral wanted me to manage all incoming/out going messages in Combat Information Center. As a Yeoman Third Class Petty Officer my duties were unusual to say the least, yet my performance had already been tested.

Understanding your enemy and its abilities means everything in a battle, especially when your enemy once was your partner in the skies for 30-years.

Sailing in the Arabian Sea off the southeast Coast of Iran, Coral Sea and Nimitz were actively engaged in Operation Evening Light in support of Operation Eagle Claw commencing at about dawn on 24 April 1980, when eight helicopters were launched from the USS Nimitz (CVN-65) sailing in the Arabian Sea off the southeast Coast of Iran for there 600-mle flight to Desert One” (Ref. 4).

When the choppers needed for the mission, eight total, left the Nimitz, Combat Information Center (CIC) was extremely active.

“The RH-53's were supposed to fly formation, low level, to the meet area. Because of the demands of the mission, at least six helicopters were needed at Desert One for the mission to go forward.

Weather for the mission was supposed to be clear. Further inland, the Marine helo pilots met their own private hell. The helicopter pilots were told to fly at or below 200 feet to avoid radar. This limitation caused them to run into what is known in the Dasht-e-Kavir, Iran's Great Salt Desert, as a "haboob", or dust storm, that they could not fly over without breaking the 200-foot limit.

Two hours into the flight, two helicopters lost sight of the task force and landed, out of action. Another had landed earlier when a warning light had come on. Their crew had been picked up but the aircraft that had stopped to retrieve them was now 20 minutes behind the rest of the formation.

Battling dust storms and heavy winds, the RH-53's continued to make their way to Desert One. After receiving word that the EC-130's and fuel had arrived, the two aircraft that had landed earlier started up again and resumed their flight to the rendezvous. But then another helicopter had a malfunction and the pilot and Marine commander decided to turn back, halfway to the site. The task force was down to six helicopters, the bare minimum needed to pull off the rescue.

The first group of three helicopters arrived at Desert One an hour late, with the rest appearing 15 minutes later” (Ref. 11).

“At Desert One, all the C-130s had landed and were taxied into place. They were waiting for the choppers.

We weren't on the ground that long, but my God, it felt like an eternity waiting for the helos,” Beyers recalled. The first two helicopters to roll in pulled up to Beyer's aircraft to be refueled. When the sixth chopper showed, everyone breathed a sigh of relief.

The Army troops boarded the helicopters. The fuels guys did their magic. Everything was good. Then word spread” (Ref. 9).

“The rescue attempt had been dealt its final blow when it was learned that one of the aircraft had lost its primary hydraulic system and was unsafe to use fully loaded for the assault. Only five aircraft were serviceable and six needed, so the mission was aborted. One of the helicopters had a hydraulic failure. Game over” (Ref. 11).

Of great concern before and during the mission was what to do if the IIRA gets wind of Operation Eagle Claw, while secret operations were being conducted and next day operations would surely alert Iran’s Air Force of not only the location of Coral Sea and Nimitz but Desert One and Manzariyeh Air Base where first and second day operations of Eagle Claw were underway and to occur upon completion of mission.

When Desert One staging area was no longer a secret, and while our planes were still on the desert floor, the Iranians begin an air campaign headed strait for our position at Desert One. Planes were launched from USS Coral Sea (CV-43) and USS Nimitz (CVN 68), until nearly every aircraft was in the sky over the desert. As previously stated, the Coral Sea alone had two fighter squadrons of F-4N's (Phantom II), a first time since WW II.

While in CIC I observed first hand how close our nation came to a possible war with Iran.

Combat Information Center Air Traffic Control Scopes captivated everyone's attention, as we witnessed an estimated 75-aircraft coming straight for the assault force. he Iranians had launched their entire Air Force stationed at the Tehran Air Force Base. Between both Carriers, an estimated 160 aircraft were launched, headed straight for the Iranian Aircraft. You could see the aircraft on the Air Traffic Control Scopes. A couple of seconds after the aircraft merged you could see three dots headed in the direction of the Tehran Air Force Base. Had either side fired at each other, the out come may have been much different.

I new then, the full striking force of our planes made a big difference. The Iranian pilots wanted no part of an air battle with U. S. Naval and Marine fighter pilots.

Had there been an air battle USS Nimitz (CVN-65) F 16’s and A-6F’s complimenting USS Coral Sea (CV-43) F-4N Phantom’s would have battled each other and pilots skills would have determined the outcome of dogfights in the air.

The Iran Air Force was well trained and with almost 223 operational Phantoms, as a part of the Shah's plan to modernize the Imperial Iranian Air Force, IIAF was capable of destroying a great number of planes launched from both Coral Sea and Nimitz.

“Contrary to Western reports, F-4 squadrons managed to maintain their combat effectiveness despite widespread political upheavals and personnel purges. Technical malfunctions, often appearing during flight preparation, would reduce the flight packages, but missions were seldom aborted for this reason” (Ref. 18).

An air war was the last thing the U. S. needed or wanted.

Pilots of the USAF and IIAF had been working together for a period of 22-years, having established friendships with each other over the years with the exception of those Pilots who the Khomeini discharged, killed or exiled because of loyalties to the Shah.

An Air Battle between USMC and Navy Pilots with the IIAF was the last thing either air force wanted.

I truly believe a level of respect each air force had for one another’s capabilities was the under lining factor no shots were fired by either side.

Operation Eagle Claw was canceled

“Beckwith needed six helicopters. Kyle, the on-scene commander, aborted the mission.
"It was crushing," Rowe said. "We had come all that way, spent all that time practicing, and now we had to turn back."

The decision made, now the crews had to evacuate the Iranian dust patch. Time was a factor. The C-130s were running low on fuel. Sunrise was fast approaching, and the team didn't want to be caught on the ground by Iranian troops. Members had already detained a civilian bus with 40-plus passengers and were forced to blow up a fuel truck, which wouldn't stop for a roadblock.

They had worn out their welcome. Dejected and disappointed, they just wanted to button up and go home.

Beyers' aircraft, flown by Capt. Hal Lewis, was critically low on fuel. But, before it could depart, the helicopter behind the aircraft had to be moved” (Ref. 9).

Operation Eagle Claw tragedy after mission was canceled

"We had just taken the head count," recalled Beyers. They had 44 Army troops on board. Beyers was on the flight deck behind Lewis' seat. "We got permission to taxi and then everything just lit up."

A fireball engulfed the C-130. According to witnesses, the helicopter lifted off, kicked up a blinding dust cloud, and then banked toward the Herc. Its rotor blades sliced through the Herc's main stabilizer. The chopper rolled over the top of the aircraft, gushing fuel and fire as it tumbled” (Ref. 9).

“It was dark and his rotors kicked up an immense dust cloud, making it difficult to see
when the pilot took off” (Ref. 11).

“Fire engulfed the plane. Training kicked in. The flight deck crew began shutdown procedures. The fire was 0utside the plane. Beyers headed down the steps toward the crew door. That's when someone opened the escape hatch on top of the aircraft in the cockpit, Beyers said. Boom. Black out.

Tech. Sgt. Ken Bancroft, one of three loadmasters on the airplane, knew he had troops to get off the plane. He went to the left troop door. Fire. Right troop door. Jammed shut.

"I don't know how I got that door off," Bancroft said.

He did. One after another, this hulk of a man tossed the Army troops off the burning plane like a crazed baggage handler unloading a jumbo jet.

Beyers had been knocked out. The flight deck door had hit him on the head as he went down the steps. When he came to, he was on fire. Conscious again, he crawled toward the rear of the plane.

"I made it halfway," Beyers said. "I quit. I knew I was dead." Somehow he moved himself closer to the door. Then he saw two figures appear through the flames. Two Army troopers had come back for him. He was alive, but in bad shape.

Beyers always had the bad habit of rolling up his flight suit sleeves. He finally paid the price. His arms, from the elbows down, were terribly burned. His hands were charred. Hair, eyebrows and eyelashes, gone. Worse were the internal injuries. His lungs, mouth and throat were burned. Yet, he clung to life.

The desert scene was one of organized chaos. Failure had turned to tragedy.

"I knew they were dead," Bancroft said of his crewmates in the front of the plane. "I looked up there, and it was just a wall of fire. There was nothing I could do.

The C-130 was evacuated and the order came to blow the aircraft and exfiltrate the country.

“The last plane left Desert One a half hour after the accident. Beyer was on that airplane.

"The accident was a calamity heaped on despair. It was devastating," wrote Kyle in his book called "The Guts to Try."

"The C-130 crews and combat controllers had not failed in any part of the operation and had a right to be proud of what they accomplished," Kyle said. "They inserted the rescue team into Iran on schedule, set up the refueling zone, and gassed up the helicopters when they finally arrived. Then, when things went sour, they saved the day with an emergency evacuation by some incredibly skillful flying. They had gotten the forces Out of Iran to fight another day -- a fact they can always look back on with pride" (Ref. 9).

“However, in the dust and confusion the order never reached the people who would blow the aircraft. There were wounded and dying men to be taken care of and the aircraft had to be moved to avoid having the burning debris start another fire. Because of this failure to destroy the helicopters, the Americans left behind them 5 RH-53D intact and top secret plans fell into the hands of the Iranians the next day and the agents waiting in-country to help the Delta operators were almost captured” (Ref. 11).

“Pride and sorrow are the two mixed emotions most participants share.

“Admiral Thomas B. Hayward, Chief of Naval Operations, in a video message to USS Nimitz (CVN-68), USS Texas and USS California during their transit home from the Indian Ocean:

"A few days ago the President made a very courageous decision as he ordered us to execute the rescue operation as we tried to free our Americans held hostage in Teheran. It was not a risk-free operation-there is no such thing as a risk-free operation..... we all shared considerable disappointment that we were not successful. But let's not be despondent about that. Our job is now to remain alert, to look for those opportunities, times when we can bring our Americans out. Our job is to stay ready” (Ref. 11).

“"We were the ultimate embarrassment," Sanchez said.”Militarily we did some astounding things, but ultimately we failed America. I'm proud of what we accomplished. I was 27 years old, and when I think about that mission it still sends shivers down my spine."
Sanchez's words capture the essence of every man on the mission. They were a brave, courageous group of men, attempting the impossible, for a noble and worthy cause. They came up short and have lived 21 years with the demons, or gremlins, that sabotaged their mission of mercy.

"They tried, and that was important," said Col. Thomas Schaefer, the U.S. Embassy defense attaché and one of the hostages. "It's tragic eight men died, but it's important America had the courage to attempt the rescue.”

Even having lived so long with the horrible outcome of that mission, Beyers never doubts his choice to take part.

"We do things other people can't do," he said. "We would rather get killed than fail. It was an accident. But, I have no doubt, had the Army guys gotten in there, we would've succeeded."

Eight men died during the aborted attempt to rescue American hostages held captive in Iran. Five of them were airmen from the 8th Special Operations Squadron at Hurlburt Field, Fla. Three were Marine helicopter crewmen.

"Take solace in the fact [that] what they did only a few could even attempt," said Lt. Gen. Norton Schwartz, the commander of Alaskan Command, at a 20th anniversary commemorative ceremony at Hurlburt Field, Fla. "What they did was keep the promise. They had the guts to try."

Schwartz was a pilot in the 8th SOS at the time of the rescue mission and went on to command Hurlburt's 16th Special Operations Wing.

Another special operator and now chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Hugh Shelton, expressed similar sentiments during a speech at an April 2000 ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery honoring those killed.

"The sheer audacity of the mission, the enormity of the task, the political situation at the time. When I reflect on the results -- both positive and negative -- I'm awed," Shelton said.

"The very soul of any nation is its heroes. We are in the company of giants and in the shadow of eight true heroes," he said.

Those heroes are Capt. Richard L. Bakke, 33; Capt. Harold J. Lewis, 35; Capt. Lyn D. McIntosh, 33; Capt. James T. McMillan II, 28; Tech. Sgt. Joel C. Mayo, 34; Marine Staff Sgt. Dewey L. Johnson, 31; Marine Sgt. John D. Harvey, 21; and Marine Cpl. George N. Holmes Jr., 22.

“The aftermath of the rescue operation was a barrage of investigations, congressional hearings and, believe it or not, more planning and training for a follow-on rescue mission.

Members of the 8th SOS were involved in those plans. In fact, some of the same crewmembers that participated in Eagle Claw came back and started preparing for the follow-up mission.

A memorial was placed at Arlington National Cemetery honoring the eight men killed. Subsequently, other tributes have been made remembering the men who died at Desert One. Hurlburt has dedicated streets in their honor. New Mexico's Holloman Air Force Base Airman Leadership School is named for Tech. Sgt. Joel Mayo, the C-130 flight engineer killed at Desert One.” (Ref. 9- U.S. Air Force, Air Force News Agency COPYRIGHT 2001 Gale Group)

“Survivors abandoned the scene, leaving the four remaining helicopters, with weapons, maps and a number of secret documents regarding the operation, and the dead bodies behind in the flaming wreckage. A few hours later, in the early morning, Carter went on national television to report to the American people on the disaster that had just occurred. The President behaved with great dignity; he made no excuses, sought no scapegoats, and accepted absolute personal responsibility” (Ref. 4).

“April 25, 1980 -- A defining moment for President Jimmy Carter, for the American people and for America's military. At 7 a.m. a somber President Carter announces to the nation, and the world, that eight American servicemen are dead and several others are seriously injured, after a super-secret hostage rescue mission failed. Broadcast on ABC-TV” (Ref. 15-ABC).

“Although initial reaction to the tragic mission was supportive of the President, the failure of the rescue attempt did more to undercut the Carter presidency than any other single event, even before this incident, the hostage crisis had become a political liability for the President. As details of the botched plan were revealed, it became another one of the many failures that Americans attributed to the President. There was little hope for another rescue mission, since Iran had put its guard up and dispersed the hostages to various locations in Tehran. The fiasco of the rescue mission, however, provided Carter a convenient moment to abandon his Rose Garden campaign in favor of a more public candidacy” (Ref. 4).

“USS Constellation (CV-64) reached the eastern Indian Ocean when the unsuccessful 24 April 1980 raid to free American hostages took place, and after cross decking supplies and spare parts, Constellation relieved the USS Coral Sea (CV-43) "GONZO" Station in in the North Arabian Sea 30 April 1980” (Ref. 1- Constellation).

By the time USS Constellation (CV-64) relieved USS Coral Sea (CV-43) with CVW-14 Air Wing and COMCARGROUP THREE embarked, departing the Arabian Sea, she was on "GONZO" Station in the North Arabian Sea 89 continious days since Coral Sea’s arrival in the Indian Ocean 1 February 1980, steaming through the Malacca Straits 31 January 1980, and then on track to the Indian Ocean, departing Singapore Bay 29 January 1980.

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) departed the Arabian Sea 30 April 1980, steaming through the Indian Ocean and Malacca Straits via the South China Sea enroute to Subic Bay.

“Edmund Muskie sworn in as U.S. Secretary of State May 9, 1980” (Ref. 12).

“Nine days at sea prior to USS Coral Sea (CV-43) arrival at Subic Bay 9 May 1980, to be the ship’s first stop on the way back to her home base, NAS Alameda, Ca., having been at sea 102 consecutive days, departing the Arabian Sea 30 April 1980.

Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan on the way home via Korea.

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) departed Subic Bay, R.P., spending a week in port, proceeding to Korea but while in direction, Coral Sea was ordered to the south of the Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan, following the potential of civil unrest in the Republic of Korea.

While in route to Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan, the crew of USS Coral Sea (CV-43) was notified that the long-dormant Mount St. Helens erupts in Washington State, hurling ash 15,000 feet into the air and setting off mudslides and avalanches, proceeded by a weeklong series of earthquakes and smaller explosions of ash and smoke. The eruptions cause minimal damage in the sparsely populated area, but about 400 people -- mostly loggers and forest rangers -- are evacuated.

USS Coral Sea (CV-43) arrived off Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan 22 May 1980.

“On 26 May 1980, USS Nimitz (CVN-68) with CVW-8 embarked arrived Norfolk, Virginia, steaming through the Southern Atlantic on her way home from the Indian Ocean operating with the United States Atlantic Command (Atlantic Fleet) under the direction of the 2nd Fleet, her first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea deployment operating with the 7th Fleet ended. Operating 144 continuous days at sea during the Iran hostage crisis, Nimitz was actively engaged in Operation Evening Light during “Operation Eagle Claw” commencing at about dawn on 24 April 1980, when eight helicopters were launched from the Nimitz sailing in the Arabian Sea off the southeast Coast of Iran for there 600-mle flight to Desert One, the attempt to rescue 52 US Embassy American diplomats held hostage in Tehra,n Iran, while the mission was aborted in the Iranian Desert when the number of RH-53's operational helicopters fell below the minimum needed to transport the attack force and hostages out of Iran during Operation Eagle Claw, and upon arrival the ship's crew was greeted by President and Mrs. Carter, members of Congress, military leaders and thousands of families and friends, the largest given to any carrier battle group returning to the United States since the end of World War II. Made her second Northern Atlantic voyage on her second Mediterranean Sea deployment operating with the 6th Fleet; ending her first Caribbean Sea and Northern Atlantic depoyment on her first deployment; reclassified CVN-68 30 June 1975. Her fourth deployment ended (10 September 1979 to 26 May 1980) since she was commissioned on 3 May 1975 by President Gerald Ford” (Ref. 4, 72 & 371).

“USS Coral Sea (CV-43) remained on station off Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan until the USS Midway (CV-41) could relieve Coral Sea.

“Following a period in Yokosuka, USS Midway (CV-41) was again on duty, this time relieving USS Coral Sea (CV-43) 30 May 1980 on standby south of the Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan following the potential of civil unrest in the Republic of Korea” (Ref. 1- Midway & 72).

Arriving in Korea in June 1980, USS Coral Sea (CV-43) spent only a few days anchored prior to arriving Alameda, Calif.

“Following a period in Yokosuka, USS Midway (CV-41) was again on duty, this time relieving USS Coral Sea 30 May 1980 on standby south of the Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan following the potential of civil unrest in the Republic of Korea” (Ref. 1-Midway).

“In June 1980, USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) was awarded the Meritorious Unit
Commendation and the Naval Air Force Pacific Battle Efficiency 'E' an the best carrier in
the Pacific Fleet for her operations connected with the Iranian crisis, when she spent 64
days in operations and year long efficiency evaluation” (Ref. 1- Kitty Hawk).

“On 11 June 1980, USS Coral Sea (CV-43) with CVW-14 embarked (tail code NK)
arrived Alameda, California, ending her 13th “Westpac” deployment operating with the Pacific Fleet (25 January 1960 to Present) and tour of duty with the 7th Fleet in the Far East, her first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea deployment during the Iranian revolution & Iran Hostage Crisis ended. Arriving Hawaii the morning of the 21st of November 1979, supplies and provisions were loaded, and Coral Sea departed the following day, arriving at Pusan, Korea, 10 December 1979, for two days of liberty, departing 12 December 1979, arriving at Subic Bay, Republic of Philippines 20 December, remaining in port until 9 January 1980, during which time on 22 December, Captain Richard M Dunleavy, USN relieved Captain Stanley R. Arthur USN as CO to become the first Naval Flight Officer in history to command an aircraft carrier, with Commander Curtain, USN (frocked to Captain), the previous Operations Department Head, Dunleavy’s XO, departing Subic Bay, Coral Sea arrived Thailand 18 January 1980, departing two days later on the 20th for Singapore, five days out of Thailand, Coral Sea pulled into Singapore Bay for a four-day rest and relaxation liberty on the 25th of January 1980, departing on the 29th, the crew quickly got underway with operations, headed for the OPAREA just east of Singapore where the ship crossed deck with the USS Kitty Hawk (CV-43) on 30th January, loading of weapons, all variety of needed supplies, and mail, passing over the equator, the same day, the Shellback initiation was held off until the 2nd of February, due to the supplies from the cross decking on the flight deck, heading through the Malacca Straits, and then on track to the Indian Ocean on 31st January, arriving approximately 5 North of the equator, on 2 February 1980, Coral Sea entered the IMPERVIM NEPTVINI REGIS, spending two days standing down, cross-decking with USS Midway (CV-41) 4 February 1980, transferring supplies and crossing the two E-2B aircraft, while a turn over brief was also conducted between both ship’s officers. Coral Sea with CVW-14 Air Wing and Rear Admiral D. C. Chambers, COMCARGROUP THREE embarked, joined up with the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) and her escort ships, operating in the North Arabian Sea on Gonzo Station 4 February 1980, established following the November 1979 takeover of the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran, Coral Sea was at sea 87 continuous days (29 January to 24 April 1980), when Operation Evening Light in support of the the top-secret mission “Operation Eagle Claw” began at about dawn on 24 April 1980, in connection with the Iranian crisis, when eight helicopters were launched from the Nimitz sailing in the Arabian Sea off the southeast Coast of Iran for there 600-mle flight to Desert One, the attempt to rescue 52 US Embassy American diplomats held hostage in Tehra,n Iran, while the mission was aborted in the Iranian Desert when the number of RH-53's operational helicopters fell below the minimum needed to transport the attack force and hostages out of Iran operating along side USS Nimitz (CVN 68), with her air wing, concluding operations the next day, Coral Sea remained on "GONZO" Station in the North Arabian Sea until relieved by USS Constellation (CV-64) 30 April 1980, herself reaching the eastern Indian Ocean when the unsuccessful 24 April 1980 raid to free American hostages took place, and after cross decking supplies and spare parts, Coral Sea had been in the Indian Ocean/North Arabian Sea 93 continuous days since her departure from Singapore 29 January 1980, arriving in the Indian Ocean 1 February 1980, steaming through the Malacca Straits 31 January 1980, arriving on "GONZO" Station in the North Arabian between 4 and 5 February, and was at sea nine days prior to Coral Sea’s arrival at Subic Bay 9 May 1980. Coral Sea was at sea 102 consecutive days at sea since her departure from Singapore Bay 29 January 1980, departing Subic Bay, R.P., spending a week in port, Coral Sea proceeded to Korea but while in direction, Coral Sea was ordered to the south of the Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan, following the potential of civil unrest in the Republic of Korea, arriving off Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan 22 May 1980, remaining on station off Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan until relieved by USS Midway (CV-41) 30 May 1980, arriving in Korea in June 1980, Coral Sea spent only a few days anchored prior to arriving Alameda, Calif., making port calls at Pusan, Korea; Subic Bay, R.P.; Pattaya Beach, Thailand and Singapore (NHC Battle Order p _). Reclassified CV-43 30 June 1975; involved in two Vietnam peace coast patrol cruises, ending with Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of Saigon 28 April 1975 during the evacuation of the Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh 12 April 1975 in Operation Eagle Pull, while her first Vietnam peace coast patrol cruise was during Operation Homecoming (9 March 1973 to 11 August 1973), following six Vietnam War Combat cruises during the Vietnam Conflict/War (1 November 1965 to 17 July 1972), completing her 1st & 2nd Vietnam Expeditionary Force (VEF) deployments during her 1st & 2nd “Westpac,” (first CVA in the Bering Sea during 12 December 1961 to 17 July 1962 deployment). Her 13th foreign water deployment since her visit to Vancouver, B.C. (18 to 22 March 1960) when she deployed from Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington upon completion of sea trials and a post-overhaul inspection and survey evaluation, commencing once recommissioned, following SCB 110A conversion (16 April 1957 to 25 January 1960) ended, decommissioned 24 April 1957, completing nine tours of duty in the Mediterranean Sea operating with the 6th Fleet (7 June 1948 to 13 August 1956); reclassified hull classification symbol CVA-43 1 October 1952. Her 24th deployment ended (13 November 1979 to 11 June 1980), since her commission 1 October 1947” (Ref.1-Coral Sea, 2-USS Coral Sea “Welcome Aboard” brochure, 34, 35 & 72).

When USS Coral Sea (CV-43) arrived in San Francisco tugboats spraying water greeted
us. Other boats were they’re honking their horns. Many smaller boats were on hand but
stayed a distance away from the ship. Flowers and confetti blanket of the ship were hung
over the Golden Gate Bridge. The families of the crew were on the pier and ship horns
Were announcing our arrival. It was quite a thing to see from the Ships Flight Deck.

References: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/index_files/page0012.htm

Return Home Photos: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/index_files/page0007.htm

Iranian Blogs

Iran Blogs

Online journals are under fire in Iran, but bloggers there and around the world refuse to let their voices be silenced.

MAGNETIC BUMPER STICKERS, SHIRTS, FRIDGE MAGNETS, BIKE STICKERS, ETC.

Be nice to America or we'll bring democracy to your country.

SUPPORT OUR TROOPS BRING THEM HOME

If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.

More liberal slogans. CarryaBigSticker.com Enter code ALT for 5% off - http://carryabigsticker.com

The Rise of the Blog - February 22, 2005

The recent preponderance of Iranian blogs is largely due to the fact that Iran is an educated society in which about two-thirds of the population is under the age of 30.
The Gutenberg of Persian weblogs, Hossein Derakhshan, thinks of the online journals known as blogs in terms of three metaphors. "Iranian weblogs are like bridges," Derkhshan said, "linking men and women, young and old, politicians and people, Iranians and the world."

Now that the United States has begun to shift its attention to Iran as the next phase of its Middle Eastern overhaul, Iranian weblogs offer unique cultural insights that mainstream media sources fail to present. According to N. Alavi, who blogs at IranBlog, "Western analysts, academics, and journalists have had little or no real access to Iran.

Alavi, like Derakhshan, claims that the only authentic voices in Iran can be found in its rapidly growing blogosphere. And while the Iranian blogging community is quickly becoming subject to an inordinate amount of draconian governmental sanctions and newly imposed punishments, even governmental higher-ups, including Iran's former reformist vice president, Mohammad Ali Abtahi, have embraced blogging. Blogging may prove to be the future of Iranian journalism, and it is also Iran's only chance of establishing a connection with its youth while attempting to alleviate tensions between the Iranian government and the West.

Now, a group called the Committee to Protect Bloggers declared Feb. 22 2005 was a day of action to free two Iranian bloggers, Mojtaba Saminejad and Arash Sigarchi, imprisoned for the opinions expressed on their blogs. Curt Hopkins, director of the Committee, told BBC News, "I hope this day will focus people."

Blogs are crucial to the public discourse in Iran right now because the Iranian government wields an iron fist over the country's major media outlets, stringently monitoring the content of daily newspapers, as well as radio and television broadcasts. Unlike in the United States, Derakhshan informed me, there has been absolutely no coverage, no discussion of the country's nuclear program in Iranian press.

The Iraq memory Foundation is a non-governmental group that was established by a number of Iraqi former exiles to document more than 35 years of miseries Iraq and the Iraqis had lived under the rule of the Baath party and Saddam Hussein. One of the projects this foundation is working on is to document testimonies of Iraqis who have suffered torture or lost relatives to the brutal regime of Hussein. I have got a pack of five DVDs telling stories of about 40 Iraqis. Here, I will tell some of these stories to participate in telling the world our dark history of more than three decades.

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/2131

24 Steps to Liberty

Here I will post my personal accounts on different issues, including social, political, and religious issues. The goal is not to affect your opinion or personal points of view. Instead, it is a way to help myself speak out things and share them with others. I hope this will help people outside Iraq to get an idea of what life really looks like here.

The Guardian Council, Once Again

We were hoping that the echo of our demands and our sincere intentions for a better future for our land could bring some sense to the Conservative Establishment. Such a wishful thinking. The Guardian Council has, once again, shown its nature and purpose: that of thwarting popular wishes and insulting popular consensus and ignoring even their own governing rules. The manner in which they announced dismissal of all but 6 candidates, by announcing it on TV before informing the Interior Ministry speaks volumes about the Council's lack of responsibility and legality. In the political arena where freedom is being prosecuted, our wishes were hanged upside down by this brazen act of the Guardian Council and the Conservative Establishment they serve.

We are not blind, nor are we a flock of sheep to be shepherded. The political arena is the domain of the people and Article 56 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran voices this principle. "Absolute sovereignty over the world and man belongs to God, and it is He who has made man master of his own social destiny. No one can deprive man of this divine right, nor subordinate it to the vested interests of a particular individual or group".

We therefore propose, regardless of the outcome of the election, to challenge Guardian Council's legality. This Council has contradicted the spirit and the letter of the Constitution on which this Republic was founded by its arbitrary and capricious acts. It is time to disband this anti-constitutional and anti-popular body once and for all. This will be our post-election agenda.

We note Dr. Moeen's past challenges to the illegal interference of the Guardian Council in legislation and elections and commend him for it. Initially Dr. Moeen was considering not accepting, being restored to the list of "eligible" candidates by the Supreme Leader. But he has correctly realized that he represents the collective desire and hunger of a huge majority in Iran for more freedom and has to be present in the political arena to carry out his mission. We think he still is an effective and responsible candidate and will make a great president who will respond to our pressure and encouragement for more freedom and the rule of law. It is therefore still crucial that we all vote for the candidate that best represents our hope and aspirations and then be ready to encourage and pressure the elected president to help abolish the Guardian Council.

Ishallvote collective - May 2005
http://www.ecommerce-one.com/ISVE/blog.htm

“Imprisoned Bloggers were tortured” says ex-VP Parthisan - December 28, 2004 04:02 PM)
http://www.persianstudents.org/archives/001243.html

http://twentyfourstepstoliberty.blogspot.com/2006/06/iraqi-testimonies_21.html

Iranian Journalist Credits Blogs for Playing Key Role in His Release From Prison - 2004-01-09

The conservative Islamic government is forced to take notice of the broad coverage given to Sina Motallebi's arrest and the ensuing online petition drive demanding his freedom. In a wide-ranging interview, he tells OJR about the 23 days spent behind bars, and how the events led to his leaving his homeland and moving to Holland.

Despite the fact that many bloggers -- usually anonymous -- inside Iran write about forbidden topics, such as sex and political freedom, the Islamic government has had to back down on attempts to block many sites. The reformists who have some power in government actually appear to be embracing bloggers, as President Mohammad Khatami recently bragged at a United Nations summit that "of the Weblogs that are created and generated -- after those in English and French -- we are No. 3 [in Persian]."
http://www.ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1073610866.php

VIENNA, Austria -- A little more than two years ago, Hossein Derakhshan started blogging. Hundreds of other people probably launched their own blogs on that same December day, but few can claim they may have sparked a revolution

"Until there is a free press in Iran again, weblogs will flourish. In the last few years about 90 (pro-democracy) newspapers in Iran have been shut down. So people have turned to the Internet to get news," Derakhshan said Friday during his presentation at BlogTalk, a two-day conference on weblogs at the Danube University Krems Center for New Media in Vienna. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0%2C1284%2C58976%2C00.html

blogs x Iranians

A directory of English blogs written by Iranians around the world. For more information on Iranian blogs http://blogsbyiranians.com

Tehran onliner - Wednesday, June 25, 2003

Some facts about Iran – “In the fight for Freedom,we need to be United”

If you are living in a country out of Asia and middle east , you might find it necessary to know more about my country Iran.

My motherland Iran is a vast country located in the middle east ,surrounded by the Persian gulf in the south, Iraq and turkey in west, Afghanistan and Pakistan in the east and former soviet union republics (Actually Azerbijan, Armenia, Turkmenistan) in the north. Iran used to have a monarchy system before 1979, governed by the Shah, but after the 1979 revolution the system changed into an Islamic republic ruled by the great faghih ( Islamic scholar ).This country has sufferd many different problems since that time ,from which I can mention the 8 year war with Iraq in which the country was badly destroyed and unfortunately after the war this destruction continued due to the mismanagement of the rulers .

Since 1979 the country is considered as an Islamic country which means ALL the rules are passed in regarding Islamic laws.Therefore, so many social rights that are considerd as basic human righs are thought to be a great sin here.

At the top of the system is the great Faghih who is a shiaati muslim scholar and is not elected by the people ( believe it or not but he is said to be the representative of God on earth ). Then is the President who is chosen directly by the people through a general election, but this is not as easy as what you might think !! The candidates are chosen beforehand by a 12-membered council who are missioned by the leader ( the official name for Faghih).So as you see the whole power is in the hands of ONE person: The leader.

The country has a parliamentary system too, but none of the laws can be passed in without the supervision of the leader.

This is a brief description of the govenmental system of Iran ;I'll try to tell you more in my next writings. http://tehranonline.blogspot.com

S'CAN-IRANIC

Perrenial Perspectives of a Secular Canuck-Iranic otherwise known as Shahram Kholdi

Iranian Weblogs on the Present Conflict in Lebanon and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

I do not believe I am ready to condemn any of the immediate parties to conflict at all. Why not to condemn all parties who have been supplying weapons to various sides of this conflict, especially those who have supplied as much fuel as possible without being exactly seen on the TV screens, i.e. the Islamic Republic of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Security and Intelligence Establishment, and last but not least, the Leadership of the Islamic Republic.

I do condemn the Islamic Republic so blatantly because none of the so-called critics of power and American imperialism have bothered condemn the Islamic Republic at all, while Bush bashing has gone through the roof.

I do also want to condemn some of the most stupid field commanders of the Israeli Defence Forces for having gone out of their way to consider any established sign of peace, such as a long established UN Post stationed by UN Peace-Keepers, including one peacekeeper from Canada's Prince's Patricia light infantry. Would some of our neo-con Webloggers bother to at leat comment about this incident?!!
http://secularcaniranik.blogs.com/scaniranic/2006/07/iranian_weblogs.html

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

EQNEEDF Recommendation for Jose Heberto Gutierrez Castro, a Mexican Citizen and my Brother

ENERGY QUEST
NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT FOUNDER
3339 Jefferson Scio Drive S. E., Jefferson Oregon 97352
Ejido Ursulo Galvan, Ensenada, B. C. Mexico
http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/
http://eqneedf.blogspot.com/
Henions Of The Civil War MAILCALL Forums
http://www.rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=9604
EQNEEDF Threads on Fox 6 Forums "Batman47"
http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=880512#880512
Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/654650.aspx
Rants and Raves Index on Fox 6 Forums
http://community.fox6.com/forums/95/ShowForum.aspx
Who or What Constitutes Media under the FOIA?
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/891284.aspx
EQNEEDF Recommendation for Jose Heberto Gutierrez Castro, a Mexican Citizen and my Brother
http://community.fox6.com/forums/892942/ShowThread.aspx#892942

Dear INCARE, Rosirito, Ba Ja, Mexico

Jose Heberto Gutierrez Castro and his wife Veronica Dominguez, Royal SUNALIANCE, Agent, TJ. Mexico are the finest examples of Mexican Citizens I ever had the privilege of spending nearly 9 years of my life. It was an honor to share precious moments of my life with Jose “Eddy” my brother in spirit and love as Eddy not only personally cared for me, but I lived in one of three of his homes in Ejido Ursulo Galvan, Ensenada, B. C. Mexico, my home upon return over looking the Ocean.

Eddy’s integrity is equal to my own and he is a credit to not only is countryman, but his dear departed mother, a Doctor in her own right when Eddy was growing up in Chuwawa, Mexico during which time Eddy learned to care for the sick Indians and never forgot that compassion and love are the key to success.

As a QUAD of nearly 23-years, an independent and self determined individual, I can tell you that Eddy’\s strength and perseverance equals none others. His devotion to his family, me included is beyond reproach. One of the finest men I’ve ever had the honor to know and my entire family here in Oregon are in his debt, and they will all tell you, they felt secure in the knowledge that my Attendant Care provided by Eddy for many, many years equaled none other, the most positive man, less myself that ever lived, my friend and brother for Life.

Eddy shut down his construction business, in order to help me so I could accomplish http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/ , now nearing four years, departing Mexico only three weeks ago.

Eddy’s Dump Truck and Backhoe setting idle, with the exception of a few community jobs for years for me. As a Contractor, Journeyman Carpenter, Electrician, Refrigeration, Air-conditioning, Plumber, Masonry and a Political Accountant, to name only a few accomplished professions, Eddy is a true Professional and entrepreneur

To have had Eddy on my team was a blessing and when the U. S. Of America ends there collective bickering and comes together to create a U. S. Mexico Guest Program you can bet your last dollar Eddy will be in it because I’ll see to it.

While I write this letter, I’m saddened were not together, but Eddy has always wanted to be a Professor and while I needed his help, he was there for me, but I was also hampering him from full filling his dreams, dreams I know he will soon achieve, because he is deeply devoted to life itself, full of inspiration and compassion for everyone.

I have publicly posted this letter in the Fox 6 Forum Thread:

Bruce Wayne Henion
bwhenion@hotmail.com
EQNEEDF

FOIA REFORM; Who or What Constitutes Media under the FOIA?

Washington D.C. office:
US House of Representatives
2446 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman Earl Blumenauer:

In around three weeks when your staff has the opportunity to review this letter, they will know it is in regard to a previous email I sent you relating to a FOIA Request to Navy, NARA for Historical Information in behalf of those who have served onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers.

I have retained an attorney, Scott A. Hodes whom has petitioned Ms. Doris Lama, Head, DON PA/FOIA Policy Branch, Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36) 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000 and Special Access and FOIA Staff, National Archives and Records Administration, NWCTF-Room 6350, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740 under the FOIA to disclose on the internet information relating to US Aircraft Carrier Foreign Water Fleet Deployments, all classification, by earliest dates and time of arrival and departure from September 1945 to present and foreign ports visited.

The two requests can be seen here:

Download nararequest.pdf
http://thefoiablog.typepad.com/the_foia_blog/files/nararequest.pdf

Download navyrequest.pdf
http://thefoiablog.typepad.com/the_foia_blog/files/navyrequest.pdf

http://thefoiablog.typepad.com or http://www.infoprivacylaw.com/foia.htm

I am an honorably discharged Navy vet, and I've compiled a great deal of historical data relating to U. S. Aircraft Carriers and deployments of our nation's fleet of aircraft carriers from September 1945 to present, illustrated at http://www.uscarrierhistory.com and in particular this chart: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart48.pdf
After four years of research comprising 16-books of the most accurate accounting of historical facts, narrative summaries, etc. of U. S. Aircraft Carrier history, I have been unable to acquire an accurate accounting of U. S. Aircraft Carrier Foreign Water Fleet Deployments from public records, to include present disclosed reports by the U. S. Navy presently available to the public.
Having spoken to one of Senator Gordon Smith’s representatives in the Portland Office two days ago, I was informed that you Senator Gordon Smith can do nothing more then to write a letter to Doris Lama and Special Access and FOIA Staff, National Archives and Records Administration inquiring as to whether they intend to reply to my request, and given the fact that my attorney will follow through on my request, I need no one follow up on my request.

I was hoping for Senator Gordon Smith’s and your support in honoring those who have served, by once and for all, making available information to the public that is not presently available, short the summary aircraft carrier reports the U. S. Navy list on their web site. USS John F. Kennedy’s historical record is possibly the most complete of all carriers with the exception of those carriers sunk in World War II, carriers decommissioned at the end of World War II and a hand few of other carriers like USS Coral Sea (CV-43) in which I spent 3 ½ years of my life when I was young.

This letter will be sent to the President in hopes he will support this cause now in it’s final stage, yet I’m pretty sure he is already aware of my request having sent him previous emails forwarding my Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO.

I have compiled 800 square feet of historical data relating to aircraft carrier history to include narrative summary reports of each carrier that served our country from September 1945 to present and anyone upon review can see the lack of available information reported during stateside and peace time deployments.

The information I seek is not classified and due to the internet, those who are presently serving onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers have access to the entire history of there carrier as far back as 2000 and twenty years from now unless we make available the entire history, like generations before them who have served, will not be able to reflect back and review the entire history of the carrier they served onboard short their cruise book.

Cruise books have deployment charts, yet there is no data base housing these charts.

The Carrier history reports presently available do not disclose all deployment history of each carrier’s deployment. On my web site you can review my references and my carrier summary reports illustrate at www.uscarrierhistory.com what history is presently reported about US Aircraft Carrier deployments. The task of assembling deployment charts and making them available digitally would be a big job, and no doubt some may not be releasable, but a few good Yeomen’s could get the job done. I’ve counted 779 deployments from Boxer to Kitty Hawk and I’m within a count of ten, because there is no combined deployment accounting. Not knowing if a carrier made a foreign port of call while transferring the Panama Canal or Cape Horn is essential in deciding if in deed any particular carrier made a Foreign Water Fleet Deployment while transferring from the east or west cost. First, and foremost, can the Navy tell the public how many Foreign Water Fleet Deployments US Aircraft Carriers have made from September 1945 to present? Without a formula I don’t think the Navy can. Is it important to know how many times our carriers operated in particular oceans and seas a month or longer or less in the case of a significant event? Well the Navy must make that decision, but the summary paragraph posted on the MAIL CALL FORUM, XETV FOX 6 FORUM and Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/654650.aspx (Below is said same)
illustrates what a writer can do with the right information and Chart 32 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart32.pdf and 48 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart48.pdf is the most accurate accounting available any where in the world and at present the US Navy can’t match it.

With the return of the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) with CVW-14 embarked, departing San Diego, California 5 January 2006 for her maiden voyage, on her first “Westpac” and first Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Exercise "Valiant Shield 2006" operating with USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) in Guam operating area from 19 to 23 June; her second deployment since her commission, the Navy’s 775th Foreign Water Fleet Deployment, the 83rd Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment, the 120th Indian Ocean deployment and 18th deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom as of 8 July 2006. USS Enterprise (CVN-65) presently underway in support of OIF is the 19th deployment in support of OIF made by U. S. Aircraft Carriers, while her deployment to the far east is her 6th Arabian Sea and Persian Gulf deployment on her 2nd Operation Iraqi Freedom deployment and the Navy’s 778th Foreign Water Fleet Deployment. USS Kitty Hawk’s present Summer Underway Period in support of Exercise "Valiant Shield 2006" is the Navy’s 779th Foreign Water Fleet Deployment as of 8 July 2006 and the Navy’s 72nd forward deployed deployment out of Yokosuka, Japan (NAF Atsugi, Japan). USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) arrival from her 4th Arabian Sea/Gulf (Persian Gulf) deployment and 1st OIF was the Navy’s 773rd Foreign Water Fleet deployment, the 17th deployment in support OIF and the 123rd Suez Canal transit, and upon USS Enterprise (CVN-65) return from the far east, will make the 124th Suez Canal transit; provided CVN-65 returns through the Suez Canal.

I’m A QUAD and my fingers don’t even work so what could Yeoman’s with fingers do. Now I’m duty bound not to share too many of my insights, having maintained a top secret clearance for 5-years while serving in the Navy. So I don’t discuss security concerns that I have in regards to our carriers either privately or publicly. Where ever the Navy’s assets share civilian ports surely must be seen as a potential target.

I am in search of a concise reckoning of Carrier History and my insights are not for sell and I’m going to push the Navy, until the Navy’s tells the world how many Foreign Water Fleet Deployments US Aircraft Carriers have made from the Boxer to Kitty Hawk?

I’m very much aware of the reports available to the public (http://eqneedf.spaces.live.com) and ships logs are only important to me in determining the length of time any particular carrier spent in any particular ocean or sea, and foreign ports visited. Now, I created a petition because the one is often not heard. It could be I’m alone. Integrity is very important to me and should be to everyone, buts its not anymore. People calling our President a criminal really pisses me off. So hers the deal, if the American people want to honor those that served, then it will happen. If it doesn’t, then those that have served will be nothing more then an archived memory. I do hope that the US Navy will make a public announcement that one day I can post on the MAILL CALL FORUM stating how many deployments our Carriers have made. In the end, the strength of the Navy will be in the hands of future generations who I guess will never have access to a summary of each deployment activities past 2000.

In the end, it’s up to my elected officials, you, Senator Gordon Smith and the President; will you honor those who have served?Here is one post that was posted after I posted my initial FOIA Request to the Navy by a retired service member.

Looking forward to seeing the book <> 09/29 17:01:57

Served 20 years (Aviator, then Intel puke), mostly on/around/supporting carriers, and have handled a few FOIAs myself. It doesn't sound like what you're asking for is sensitive, especially pre-'76 stuff (almost everything is declassified after 30 years), and especially since carrier Opareas are almost impossible to conceal. Unlike subs, CV groups tend to make lots of noise, and generate lots of high-visibility activity; then again, that was the fun of it.

Fair winds and following seas
http://forums.salem.craigslist.org/?ID=50062612

Very Respectfully, EQNEEDF

Copy to:

Washington, DC Office
404 Russell Building
Washington, DC 20510
Gordon Smith
President Bush
MAILCALL FORUM
XETV FOX 6 FORUM

My attorney Scott A. Hodes is fighting for us, the independent, those of us who blog it or have web sites.

September 28, 2006

I leave you with one thought:

FOIA Reform is necessary and I don't really think very many Americans other then those few who stay informed really care about policies our elected Representatives are originating until they affect them personally and it is evidently clear to me, Americans, less a few, really care about the history of U. S. Aircraft Carriers.

September 27, 2006

Request to Navy, NARA for Historical Information

I am an honorably discharged Navy vet, and I've compiled a great deal of historical data relating to U. S. Aircraft Carriers and deployments of our nation's fleet of aircraft carriers from September 1945 to present, illustrated at http://www.uscarrierhistory.com and in particular this chart: http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart48.pdf

After four years of research comprising 16-books of the most accurate accounting of historical facts, narrative summaries, etc. of U. S. Aircraft Carrier history, I have been unable to acquire an accurate accounting of U. S. Aircraft Carrier Foreign Water Fleet Deployments from public records, to include present disclosed reports by the U. S. Navy presently available to the public, so on behalf of those who have served onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers I have retained an attorney, Scott A. Hodes whom has petitioned Ms. Doris Lama, Head, DON PA/FOIA Policy Branch, Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36) 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000 and Special Access and FOIA Staff, National Archives and Records Administration, NWCTF-Room 6350, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740 under the FOIA to disclose on the internet information relating to US Aircraft Carrier Foreign Water Fleet Deployments, all classification, by earliest dates and time of arrival and departure from September 1945 to present and foreign ports visited.

The two requests can be seen here:

Download nararequest.pdf
http://thefoiablog.typepad.com/the_foia_blog/files/nararequest.pdf

Download navyrequest.pdf
http://thefoiablog.typepad.com/the_foia_blog/files/navyrequest.pdf

http://thefoiablog.typepad.com or http://www.infoprivacylaw.com/foia.htm

FOIA REFORM; Who or What Constitutes Media under the FOIA? http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/891284.aspx

Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO THREAD http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/654650.aspx

Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/654650.aspx

Letter to Armed Forces News Service in reference to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/664173.aspx

2nd Letter to CIV CHINFO in Response to FHTNC, Norfolk, Va. letter to Batman http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/669171.aspx

U.S. Aircraft Carriers Safest International Transit projected until years end http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/683259.aspx

U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER AND THE CARRIER INDUSTRIAL BASE AS OF 2006 http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/683253.aspx

GAO Seeks Exemption for Congressional Correspondence

The Government Accountablity Office ("GAO") is seeking via the Federal Register an exemption that would allow it to withhold records of interviews it creats in connection with its audits, evaluations or investigations. According to the GAO, since September 11, 2001, interviewess are less willing to provide information to it if they know the interview will become public.

While the GAO, a Legislative branch agency, is not subject to the FOIA, it generally follows the FOIA in response to requests for information from it. The public has until November 2, 2006 to respond to the GAO.

Virginia FOIA Resource

The Virginia Coalition for Open Government has an excellent website concerning the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. This website gives the latest in various Virginia FOIA legislation and litigation. It also answers questions about the Virginia FOIA that are asked by visitors to the site. http://www.opengovva.org

FOIA Legislation Passes Senate Judiciary Committee

The Open Government Act of 2005 sponsored by Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) and Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 21, 2006. The bill would, among other things, give agencies 20 working days to decide whether or not to release the requested documents and make the government provide a database for requesters to track their FOIA requests. I wrote extensively about the legislation when it was introduced in my montly column at llrx.com. There is a House version of the bill, but it has not moved since being introduced. http://thefoiablog.typepad.com

The Senator Most Interested in FOIA Issues

Guesses anyone? Suprisingly, I would say that the Senator most interested in FOIA issues is Texas Senator John Cornyn (R). (For those of you not up on politics and FOIA, Republicans have not been traditionally behind the bill.) Last year Sen. Cornyn introduced two bills concerning the FOIA including an amendment of the FOIA that was very pro-requester. (I've written about my views on the legislation and its being thwarted by the administration at lllrx.com). The Senator has continued to talk about FOIA and other disclosure issues during his summer recess. Hopefully, following the November elections, he'll have enough votes to push through some real FOIA changes.
http://thefoiablog.typepad.com/ or http://www.infoprivacylaw.com

John Cornyn, United States Senator, Texas http://cornyn.senate.gov/index.asp?f=page&pid=232&gid=3

Senate Approves Cornyn-Leahy FOIA Reform

Reform Bill Would Ensure That Any Future Legislative FOIA Exemption Attempts Be
Transparent

Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy

On Passage of Section 8 of the Open Government Act - June 24, 2005 http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200506/062405.html

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) http://leahy.senate.gov

Examine and reform the federal Freedom of Information Act http://www.lbjjournal.org/PrintLBJArchives/2004/Fall2004/02practitioner_fa2004.pdf

2006 FOI update: in Congress http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/analysis.aspx?id=16643

Published July 15, 2006 By Scott A. Hodes -

[Editor's note: please see the related article in this issue, Statement of Meredith Fuchs, General Counsel, The National Security Archive Before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Hearing on the Media’s Role and Responsibilities in Leaks of Classified Information.] http://www.llrx.com/features/leaksofclassifiedinfo.htm

The problem with making a law in the 1970s and then ignoring the fact that technology, commerce and government operations have all changed completely from the time the law was passed, is illustrated by the fee waiver provision for members of the media as set forth in the FOIA.

The FOIA grants fee waivers to "representatives of the news media, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(4)(A)(ii)(II). At the time the law came into being, the news media was either print (newspapers and magazines) or electronic (radio and TV). Today the landscape has completely changed. While news is still produced by the traditional print and electronic sources, it is also produced by an increasing amount of independent internet sites, bloggers and other entities (public and non-public), publicizing their findings on their own websites.

Agencies have now struggled for years with the question of what, in the age of the internet, constitutes the news media? Today, anyone with an internet connection can produce a site capable of publicizing information it collects via a FOIA request.

Congress has failed to address this question, leaving agencies in a no-win situation where they must struggle to find the answer to who qualifies as members of the media. If agencies fail to grant media status, they are challenged in court, such as the recent case of the National Security Archives suit against the CIA, where the CIA revoked the Archives status as a member of the media. The Archive is now challenging this decision in federal court.

Besides the legal costs of defending their actions, agencies also lose if fee waivers are granted. In a time of decreasing funding of FOIA offices, agencies lose out on being reimbursed for thousands of dollars if fees they would otherwise by being able to collect.

Additionally, one has to question whether the current fee waiver scheme is fundamentally fair, or is it merely another form of corporate welfare. Major media such as the New York Times or the Washington Post or Fox makes millions of dollars in profits every year, and no one would argue that they don’t qualify for fee waivers under the current scheme. However, the National Security Archives or an individual making a FOIA request him or herself and publishing the information on a website may not qualify for a fee waiver under current law. I would argue that fundamental justice and democratic principles should allow the FOIA fee waiver provision to find a way to put big media and the lone blogger on an equal footing. Only an act of Congress can do that.

The much anticipated reports Agency FOIA Improvement Reports Under EO 13392 are on the Department of Justice FOIA website. There are numerous reports of agencies here, however, an early reading of the goals and findings of the reports is clearly underwhelming. As it is basically a process akin to one where the student can give themselves their own grade, the reports are very generous in how the agencies will deal with the problems they have found. Rather than go through this process, it would have been more beneficial to requesters if Congress had passed the FOIA legislation proposed by Texas Senator John Cornyn. Until new legislation or real Executive action occurs, FOIA backlogs will continue to rise and requesters will continue to be an afterthought. http://www.llrx.com/columns/foia33.htm http://www.llrx.com

From time to time the Coalition of Journalist for Open Government and concerned members file letters of protest to various officials or comments solicited by federal departments as they are implementing new regulations. In addition, many of the CJOG member organizations have individually filed letters of concern or protests, or joined in lawsuits on open government issues. http://www.cjog.net/protest.html

Feroce to introduce “Legislative Reform Package”

STATE SENATE CANDIDATE JOHN FEROCE CALLS FOR TERM LIMITS, “REVOLVING DOOR” AND FOIA REFORM LEGISLATION

District 14 State Senate Candidate, John Feroce (R-Middletown), says he will introduce legislation to reform the General Assembly.
http://feroceforsenate.com/media/press_releases/legis_reform_pkg.cfm

Congressional Record: June 24, 2005 (Senate) - Page S7383-S7385

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT EXEMPTIONS

Mr. ALEXANDER. I ask unanimous consent the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of Calendar 126, S. 1181.

The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title.The legislative clerk read as follows:

A bill (S. 1181) to ensure an open and deliberate process in Congress by providing that any future legislation to establish a new exemption to section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act) be stated explicitly within the text of the bill.

Mr. LEAHY. Mr President. Earlier this month, Senator Cornyn and I introduced a simple and straight forward bill to strengthen open Government and the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA. It was the third commonsense proposal on Government openness we have offered to the Senate this year. The Senator from Texas has a long record of promoting open government, most significantly during his tenure as attorney general of Texas. He and I have forged a productive partnership in this Congress to support and strengthen FOIA. We introduced two bills earlier this year and held a hearing on our bill, S. 394, the Open Government Act, during Sunshine Week in March. The bill we pass today simply requires that when Congress sees fit to provide a statutory exemption to FOIA, it must state its intention to do so explicitly. The language of this bill was previously introduced as section 8 of the Open Government Act. No one argues with the notion that some Government information is appropriately kept from public view. FOIA contains a number of exemptions for national security, law enforcement, confidential business information, personal privacy, and other matters. One provision of FOIA, commonly known as the (b)(3) exemption, states that records that are specifically exempted by statute may be withheld from disclosure.

Many bills that are introduced contain statutory exemptions or contain language that is ambiguous and might be interpreted as such by the courts. In recent years, we have seen more and more such exemptions offered in legislation. A 2003 Justice Department report stated that Congress has been ``increasingly active in enacting such statutory provisions.'' A June 3, 2005, article by the Cox News Service titled, ``Congress Cloaks More Information in Secrecy,'' pointed to 140 instances ``where congressional lawmakers have inserted such exemptions'' into proposed legislation.Our shared principles of open government lead us to believe that individual statutory exemptions should be vigorously debated before lawmakers vote in favor of them. Sometimes such proposed exemptions are clearly delineated in proposed legislation, but other times they amount to a few lines within a highly complex and lengthy bill.
These are difficult to locate and analyze in a timely manner, even for those of us who stand watch. As a result, such exemptions are often enacted with little scrutiny, and as soon as one is granted, others are requested. Continued: http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2005/s062405.html

Cornyn, Leahy Introduce Bill

To Promote Openness In Government …Bipartisan Legislation Improves, Strengthens FOIA


WASHINGTON (Wednesday, Feb. 16) -- U.S. Senators John Cornyn (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the ranking Democratic member of the panel, introduced legislation on Wednesday to achieve meaningful reforms to federal government information laws, most notably the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 (FOIA).
The bipartisan “Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act of 2005”, or the OPEN Government Act, is aimed at substantially enhancing and expanding the accessibility, accountability, and openness of the federal government. The legislation is supported by groups from across the political spectrum, including the ACLU and the Heritage Foundation.
“This reform legislation was created from the belief that FOIA establishes a presumption of openness,” said Cornyn, who in 2001 was presented with the James Madison Award for his efforts to promote open government by the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas. “Open government is one of the most basic requirements of any healthy democracy. It allows for taxpayers to see where their money is going; it permits the honest exchange of information that ensures government accountability; and it upholds the ideal that government never rules without the consent of the governed.”

“This bill advances one of the most fundamental rights of Americans, the public’s right to know what its government is doing,” said Leahy, who has been a longtime champion of FOIA in Congress. Leahy sponsored the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments, which updated FOIA for the Internet age, and in 1996 he was installed in the Freedom of Information Act Hall of Fame.

“Access to public information in a timely and effective manner is a vital piece of our democratic system of checks and balances that promotes accountability and imbues trust,” said Leahy.
“FOIA represents the foundation of our modern open government laws and this bill builds on that by updating its protections to include new technologies and refining the process to reduce delays and encourage accessibility.”

The Cornyn-Leahy legislation is not just pro-openness, pro-accountability, and pro-accessibility - it's also pro-Internet. It includes a hotline enabling citizens to track their requests, including Internet tracking, and grants privileged FOIA fees for bloggers and writers for Internet outlets, providing the same status as traditional media. The last time Congress approved major reforms to FOIA was nearly a decade ago, and the Senate Judiciary Committee has not convened an oversight hearing on compliance issues since April 30, 1992. The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which shares jurisdiction over federal government information, has not held a FOIA oversight hearing since 1980. Continued: http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200502/021605.html

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was passed by Congress in 1966 and amended in 1974 in order to create an open government. The FOIA applies only to federal agencies and does not create a right of access to records held by Congress, the courts, or by state or local government agencies. Each state has its own public access laws.

Renewed Call for FOIA Improvement Legislation 08/08/2006

Experts testified last month at a subcommittee hearing of the House Government Reform Committee that agencies still have a long way to go toward improving their handling of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Their testimony, along with troubling findings from a congressional report on FOIA, may help move reform legislation forward. Read More

Support Grows for Contracts and Grants Disclosure 07/25/2006

The financial and information management subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs held a July 18 hearing on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (S. 2590). Support in the Senate for the bill that would create a free, searchable public database of government contracts and grants has surged in recent weeks, helping propel the issue forward. Read More

FOIA's 40th Anniversary - Bigger Backlogs and Poor Planning 07/11/2006

This July 4th marked the 40th anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), signed into law by President Lyndon Baines Johnson. Open government advocates marked the occasion by releasing two reports that simultaneously underscored the importance of FOIA 40 years later and the need for improved agency procedures.http://www.ombwatch.org/article/archive/233

On March 15, 2005, Senators Levin (D-MI), Lieberman (D-CT ... ARL signs statement of support to fix the vague FOIA exemption and restrictions.) http://www.arl.org/info/frn/gov/foia/index.html

More than 80,000 concerned Americans signed on to our Freedom of Information Act request demanding the details of Supreme Court nominee John Roberts's work on 16 crucial cases during his tenure in the first President Bush's office of Solicitor General.

Those 16 cases deal with the most important issues facing the Supreme Court, including civil rights, equal opportunity for all, women's rights, our right to privacy, and access to justice. It's crucial that the Senators approving Roberts's nomination have access to this information to help them determine whether Roberts will protect our basic rights or let partisan ideology guide his decisions.

The response was tremendous. We've printed and boxed up the thousands of pages of signatures and sent them via courier to the Justice Department. The administration has just 20 days to respond to our request, and we'll keep you updated. http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/08/80000_foia_requ.php

Congress hears of FOIA successes and flaws

House hearing on the Freedom of Information Act focuses on need for reform

Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Todd Platts, R-PA, was critical of the government's FOIA practices and wanted to know how many federal employees were ever reprimanded or dismissed for not complying with FOIA. None of the witnesses were aware of such an action.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, repeatedly questioned government witnesses on what recourse requesters had, besides litigation, to appeal a refused or redacted request. According to the witnesses, there is no method of appeal besides returning to the same agency, which first refused the request. Later witnesses testified that such a process is rarely successful.
Congressional and public support for improving and strengthening FOIA has been growing since the introduction of the OPEN Government Act of 2005, a bipartisan bill sponsored by Senators John Cornyn, R-TX, and Pat Leahy, D-VT, Rep. Lamar Smith, R-TX, introduced the bill to the House of Representatives http://www.nna.org/articles/foia.htm

109th Congress Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session
109-226
_______________________________________________________________________Union Calendar No. 127

A CITIZEN'S GUIDE ON USING THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 TO REQUEST GOVERNMENT RECORDS
SECOND REPORT by the
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html http://www.house.gov/reform

September 20, 2005.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House onthe State of the Union and ordered to be printed

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM

TOM DAVIS, Virginia, Chairman
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut
HENRY A. WAXMAN, California
DAN BURTON, Indiana
TOM LANTOS, California
ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida
MAJOR R. OWENS, New York
JOHN M. McHUGH, New York
EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York
JOHN L. MICA, Florida
PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania
GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota
CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York
MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana
ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland
STEVEN C. LaTOURETTE, Ohio
DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio
TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania
DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois
CHRIS CANNON, Utah
WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri
JOHN J. DUNCAN, Jr., Tennessee
DIANE E. WATSON, California
CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan
STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts
MICHAEL R. TURNER, Ohio
CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland
DARRELL E. ISSA, California
LINDA T. SANCHEZ, California
GINNY BROWN-WAITE, Florida
C.A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland
JON C. PORTER, Nevada
BRIAN HIGGINS, New York
KENNY MARCHANT, Texas
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of
LYNN A. WESTMORELAND, Georgia Columbia
PATRICK T. McHENRY, North Carolina
CHARLES W. DENT, Pennsylvania
BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont
VIRGINIA FOXX, North Carolina
(Independent)J
EAN SCHMIDT, Ohiohttp://www.fas.org/sgp/foia/citizen.html

8 CONSERVATIVE LEADERS ENDORSE U.S. FOIA REFORM

David Keene is chairman of the American Conservative Union, one of the oldest and largest advocacy groups on the Right. A Reagan campaign stalwart, he remains a keeper of the conservative faith as one of the movement’s wise men.

Keene is also one of eight major leaders on the Right who are encouraging Sen. Cornyn in his effort to reform the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by, among other things, giving it some real teeth.

Joining Keene in signing a recent letter to Cornyn were Amy Ridenour, president of the National Center for Public Policy Research; Mike Krempasky, founder and director of RedState.org; Mark Levin, president of the Landmark Legal Foundation; Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center; John Berthoud, president of the National Taxpayers Union; Terence Scanlon, president of the Capital Research Center; and Alex Mooney, executive director of the National Journalism Center of Young America’s Foundation.

“As the federal government becomes ever bigger, more expensive and more intrusive, it becomes more important than ever that Americans have greater access to routine official documents that show what is being done in their name in the nation’s capitol, subject only to reasonable exceptions like national security, law enforcement, personal privacy, etc.,” the conservative leaders told Cornyn.

Mark Tapscott, The Heritage Foundation http://www.opengovva.org/content/view/777/154

FOIA and the Emergence of Federal Information Policy in the 1980s and 1990s http://fs.huntingdon.edu/jlewis/Prof/Garson-ed-Chap4-80s-90s.htm

Classified Activities and Clandestine Special Operations Studies Program Institute

Study 1 Open Letters to Senators Kyl and Shelby and Study 2 Open Letter to Attorney General Ashcroft http://www.geocities.com/larryjodaniel/21.html

My attorney will be filing an Official Request for Release of Information next week to the U. S. Navy( http://www.infoprivacylaw.com/foia.htm )

On behalf of those who have served onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers I would like the U. S. Navy to disclose on the internet information relating to US Aircraft Carrier Foreign Water Fleet Deployments, all classification, by earliest dates and time of arrival and departure from September 1945 to present and foreign ports visited. http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/547160195

FOIA FILLING DATE WILL BE REPORTED NEXT WEEK
SUMMARY OF FOREIGN WATE FLEET DEPLOYMENTS BY NUMBERED CARRIER DEPLOYMENT September 1945 to 8 June 2006 http://www.uscarrierhistory.com/charts/chart48.pdf

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

EQNEEDF Threads on Fox 6 Forum "Batman47"

ENERGY QUEST
NATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT FOUNDER
http://www.uscarrierhistory.com
http://www.blogmyspace.com/eqneedf
http://www.eqneedf.myspace.com
http://eqneedf.blogspot.com/
http://eqneedf.spaces.live.com/
http://www.eqneedf.bravejournal.com/
http://batman47.bravejournal.com
Henions Of The Civil War MAILCALL Forums
http://www.rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=9604
EQNEEDF Threads on Fox 6 Forums "Batman47"
http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=880512#880512
Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/654650.aspx
Rants and Raves Index on Fox 6 Forums
http://community.fox6.com/forums/95/ShowForum.aspx
Who or What Constitutes Media under the FOIA?
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/891284.aspx
EQNEEDF Recommendation for Jose Heberto Gutierrez, a Mexican Citizen and my Brother
http://community.fox6.com/forums/892942/ShowThread.aspx#892942
Historical Excellence; Honoring Patriots who made the Ultimate Sacrifice for Freedom http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?p=136205

As I post more and more Threads are ending up in the Archives, so I must post on them in order to have them reappear, yet I will only be posting on threads if there is a need and not just to do it so the views from the internet can be seen. If my Threads all end up in the archives, here is the master Fox 6 Forums Batman47 Thread Index and there backed up by my blog at: http://eqneedf.blogspot.com/

My goal was to Get the Message Out; you may ask what message, the message of common sense, that’s what! I'm thankful to Fox 6, San Diego, California for allowing a Veteran the opportunity to post references and my views without being censored provided we keep it correct and accurate and with way over 15,000 views since July 2006, growing daily on Threads that no longer need more than occasional input, referencing MAILCALL Threads, we may have reached someone and it may have made a difference. Threads speak for themselves and within the next 90 days hundreds of individual threads will be broken down and be available throughout the world wide net!

EQNEEDF RENEWABLE ENERGY LETTER http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/761121.aspx

Independence from Middle East Oil through expanded Renewable Energy Technologies
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/876199.aspx

Iran Nuclear Reactor Future and the World Divided On Whether Iran Has the Right to Uranium Enrichment http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/802823.aspx

“Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” (1980) http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/905345.aspx

U. S. War against Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, PLO war Against Israel & the U. S. & Allies; Al-Qaida warns Muslims: Time to get out of U.S. http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/869751.aspx

Letter from the beseeched country of Israel; Office of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/688401.aspx

Weapons of Mass Destruction; EQNEEDF letter to The President of the U.S. Of America
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/684851.aspx

Should Israel Stand Alone? http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/679704.aspx

The Silent War at Home http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/635177.aspx

Americans killed by Middle East-based terrorists; beginning with Robert "Bobby" Kennedy http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/752461.aspx

Democratic Party of Hizballah http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/754044.aspx

World War II Gunny GETS SOME HELP http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/796807.aspx]

Veterans Resources, Sacrifices and Enduring Hardships as a Result of the War on Terror and a Failed VA System http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/879195.aspx

Army and Marines Having Difficulty Meeting Goals In Recruiting http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/802251.aspx

TOMCAT AND HORNET SUPERSONIC, TWIN ENGINE FIGHTERS http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/669399.aspx

U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER AND THE CARRIER INDUSTRIAL BASE AS OF 2006 http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/683253.aspx

USS Kennedy Decommissionig And CVN-73 In Japan By 2008 http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/810442.aspx

USS Enterprise launched airstrikes against Taliban fighters near Kandahar http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/861696.aspx

FOIA REFORM; Who or What Constitutes Media under the FOIA?http://community.fox6.com/forums/891284/ShowThread.aspx#891284

Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO THREAD
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/654650.aspx

Letter to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/654650.aspx

Re: Letter to Armed Forces News Service in reference to Alan P. Goldstein CIV CHINFO WASHINGTON DC, CHINFO http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/664173.aspx

2nd Letter to CIV CHINFO in Response to FHTNC, Norfolk, Va. letter to Batman http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/669171.aspx

U.S. Aircraft Carriers Safest International Transit projected until years end http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/683259.aspx

Man Overboard during USS CORAL SEA (CV-43) 79/80 Westpac http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/662908.aspx

Military Conduct http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/662896.aspx

DISCLOSURE AND IMPROPER HANDLING OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION
http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/730897.aspx

Honoring those who have served onboard Aircraft Carriers http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/627968.aspx

Honoring those who have served onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers; Request for Information to the Honorable Donald C. Winter http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/640915.aspx

Official Request of Release of Information Public Notice; Honoring those who have served onboard U. S. Aircraft Carriers – Part II http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/735883.aspx

Guest Program; Letter to the President http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/634631.aspx
WORK GUEST PROGRAM BETWEEN THE U. S. OF AMERICA AND MEXICO http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/717876.aspx

50,000 immigrant visas available through a lottery http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/779915.aspx

Biometric Identifiers http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/802270.aspx

INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME http://community.fox6.com/forums/post/662972.aspx

What's your funniest story http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=662929#662929

EQNEEDF Recommendation for Jose Heberto Gutierrez, a Mexican Citizen and my Brother
http://community.fox6.com/forums/892942/ShowThread.aspx#892942

World War II Posters, Aircraft from the past to the present, Helicopters, Ships, Subs & Military Equipment http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=896131#896131

Parents and Teachers Resources for children with Disabilities http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/1012866.aspx

Propositions that are on the November 7, 2006 General Election Ballot http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/1011648.aspx

Proposition 87 Clean Alternative Energy Program http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/1011599.aspx

Proposition 89, the "clean money" initiative http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/1012742.aspx

Questions for our Elected Officials http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/1011576.aspx

Those who oppose and those who support the Iraq War http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=1011559#1011559

Sexual and or alleged misconduct of Our Elected Officials and their Associates
http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=1011463#1011463

California Workers' Compensation Reform/Resources for the Injured Worker http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/995907.aspx

INDEX OF ENTERIES ON BLOG AT http://eqneedf.spaces.live.com

Past to Present Naval Ships and Subs

"Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” (1980) Part I, II and II

USS CORAL SEA (CV-43)
THIRTEENTH “WESTPAC” DEPLOYMENT AND
FIRST INDIAN & ARABIAN SEA DEPLOYMENT
Iranian revolution & Iran hostage crisis
“Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” (April 24, 1980)
Cheju-Do Islands in the Sea of Japan on the way home via Korea
(13 November 1979 to 11 June 1980)

INDEX OF ENTERIES ON BLOG AT http://batman47.bravejournal.com

Iran Nuclear Reactor Future and the World Divided On Whether Iran Has the Right to Uranium Enrichment Part I, II and III References

Iran's Present Military Strength and Israel’s Air Strike Capabilities

Iran IRIAF - a new Air Force? Window to the Past (70/80s)

Pillars of the Temple of Liberty

INDEX OF ENTERIES ON BLOG AT http://www.eqneedf.bravejournal.com

World War II Posters, Aircraft from the past to the present and Helicopters

Past to Present Naval Ships and Subs

Monday, September 18, 2006

Army and Marines Having Difficulty Meeting Goals In Recruiting

Within the past few months, thousands of Marines and Sailors have been replaced during a rotation of forces in Iraq. Of the 31,000 Marines, sailors, and other personnel who make up the I Marine Expeditionary Force, more than 5,000 are Reserve Marines - many who served during the initial phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom last year. http://www.mfr.usmc.mil/Archive/2004.10/reservescrucial.html

Army Having Difficulty Meeting Goals In Recruiting
Fewer Enlistees Are in Pipeline; Many Being Rushed Into Service
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40469-2005Feb20.html

The Army has raised the enlistment age to 42, made possible under provisions of the Fiscal Year 2006 National Defense Authorization Act. http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?story_id_key=9197

Army Aims to Catch Up on Recruits in Summer
Numbers Are Down tor Fourth Month
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/10/AR2005061001897.html

Army Seeking Volunteers for Foreign Area Officer Duty

The Army is seeking commissioned officers to volunteer for the special duty of Foreign Area Officer. The Army is working to increase its Foreign Area Officer corps by 30 percent to improve relationships between U.S. and foreign militaries. Often described as Soldier-statesman, FAOs spend more than half their careers in foreign embassies serving as attachés, security assistance officers, staff advisors on military affairs and operations, and liaison officers to foreign militaries.
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/army/a/fao.htm

Program expands to include Retired Army personnel; https://www.usarec.army.mil/smart/ Effective 1 June 2006, Army Retirees are eligible to provide referrals under this program and receive the $1K bonus by referring persons that have not previously conducted an appointment with a recruiter. Army Retirees include:

(1) Active Army Retirees, which includes retired officers and enlisted members of the Regular Army; and

(2) Army Reserve Component Retirees, which includes Reserve members receiving retired pay, Reserve members who have transferred to the Retired Reserve after completing the requisite qualifying years credible for retired pay, but who have not yet reached 60 years of age, and retired members of the National Guard. The bonus payments to Army Retirees that participate in this pilot program will not be offset against those members retired/retainer pay. Soldiers must provide all information on the website including name, address, social security number and contact phone number of the referral using this process. The referring Soldiers are required to establish a user account prior to making a referral. Referring Soldiers are also required to submit their personal information on the website including their social security number to facilitate payment via DFAS.

Please note that the bonus is paid only after the referral completes and graduates from Initial Entry Training (IET). Please refer to the messages and criteria for this program under the "Policies" link above. All information provided by the referring Soldier will be authenticated by the HQ USAREC program manager to determine their eligibility. Once contact is made with the referral the referring Soldier will receive a letter by mail of the referrals current status. If the referral becomes unqualified, does not enlist and ship to IET, or fails to complete IET the referring Soldier will also receive a letter by mail on the referrals status. Due to privacy requirements the exact reasons for disqualification or failure to complete training will not be disclosed. Any questions regarding the Referral Bonus Program should be directed to 1-800-223-3735 extension 6-0473. For referrals to the Army National Guard referring Soldiers should call 1-800-GoGuard (1-800-464-8273) or go to http://www.1800goguard.com/esar.

COULD THIS BE THE FUTURE? (Fiction or is it?)

U.S. Army Secret Genetic Enlistment Program Offsets Low Recruitment Levels
http://www.avantnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=154

According to representatives of the investigative team, who have thus far wished to remain nameless for fear of reprisals from the military, the U.S. Army has been systematically testing embryos in lower- and lower-middle class prenatal wards for "genetic predisposition to military engagement". This project has reportedly been underway since at least the beginning of 2005, a year that saw the lowest Army recruitment levels in several decades, largely as a reaction to the failures and distortions of President Bush's Iraq conflict.

Today in Iraq http://dailywarnews.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_dailywarnews_archive.html

Over 500 Reports of Sexual Assault among U.S. Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan

Over 500 cases of sexual assault have been reported among U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan since the summer of 2002, according to the executive director of the Miles Foundation, a nonprofit group that tracks sexual crimes in the military.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/06/over_500_report.html

PRESENT IRAQ STRENGTH The new offensive has driven the number of U.S. troops in Iraq up to 135,000 — reversing a trend of declining personnel levels that had begun earlier this year. And, the increased level dampens hopes of a significant withdrawal of U.S. troops by the end of the year, just as members of Congress returned to their home districts to voters growing increasingly weary of the war.

Soldiers who serve more than 365 days on the warfront will receive $1,000 more per month — $800 for incentive pay and $200 for additional hazardous duty pay. The bulk of the 172nd Brigade was still in Iraq when Rumsfeld extended their deployment as part of a plan to quell the escalating violence in Baghdad. Overall, the brigade has about 3,900 troops. About 300 Alaska-based soldiers sent home from Iraq just before their unit's deployment was extended last month must now go back, the Army said Monday, setting up a wrenching departure for troops and families who thought their service there was finished. The soldiers — all from the 172nd Stryker Brigade — are among the close to 380 troops who had gotten home to Fort Wainwright and to Fort Richardson when Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld ordered the unit to serve four more months. The remaining 80 will not have to return to Iraq. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060814/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_iraq_troops

While less and less Americans want to join the Armed Forces a citizen of the Dominican Republic and two citizens of Mexico became citizens by serving.

Maybe we could give an opportunity to millions of the 10 million illegal citizens citizenship in they joined the Armed Forces. These men earned their citizenship for an un grateful nation, and if I wrong, then tell me why no one will help the Gunny or why only 15 states prohibit those who spread there hateful sentiments at our Patriots funerals, our disabled veterans suffering with minimum VA funding to assist them.

WASHINGTON - President Bush presided over a citizenship ceremony on Monday for three soldiers injured in Iraq, calling them "men who knew the cost of freedom and were willing to pay that cost so others could live free."

Bush also used his visit to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center to promote his stalled proposal for overhauling the nation's immigration laws. He urged Congress to break the current stalemate and pass legislation that "must be comprehensive."

The three injured soldiers who took the oath and became citizens were Spc. Noe Santos-Dilone of Brooklyn, N.Y.; Spc. Sergio Lopez of Bolingbrook, Ill.; and Pfc. Eduardo Leal-Cardenas of Los Angeles. Santos-Dilone was a citizen of the Dominican Republic and the other two were citizens of Mexico. Santos-Dilone, who stood on crutches while the other two were standing on their own at the ceremony, was injured last Sept. 6 when the convoy in which he was riding was bombed.

Lopez was injured when his Humvee was hit by a roadside bomb south of Baghdad last Jan. 6. Leal-Cardenas was injured by a roadside bomb last Dec. 6 while returning to his base from a mission just south of Baghdad. Bush called it, "a joyful day for these men, a joyful day for me to be here with them...It's a privilege to be their commander in chief." "This isn't going to be the first time these men have made such a promise. They took a similar oath when they became soldiers of the United States Army.

And their presence here bears witness that they kept their word so that others might be free," Bush said. "As our nation debates the future of our immigration policies, we must remember the contribution of these good men and all who dream of contributing to this country's future," Bush said.

After the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, Bush signed an executive order making foreign-born members of the U.S. military immediately eligible for U.S. citizenship when they serve on active duty. "It made sense to me: If somebody's willing to risk their lives for our country, they ought to be full participants in our country," Bush said.

He noted that more than 33,000 non-U.S. citizens currently serve in the military. Trying to break the deadlock on immigration legislation, Bush said securing the nation's borders must be the first goal. After that, he said, it must offer a temporary worker program, tougher penalties for employers who hire undocumented workers, resolve the status of the million of illegal workers now in the country while honoring "the great American tradition of the melting pot."

The Senate earlier in the year passed a bipartisan immigration bill offering a chance at citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants and generally delivering on the goals outlined by Bush. But the House, which in 2005 passed a far-more-restrictive bill that would make it a felony to enter the United States illegally, is holding a series of time-consuming hearings on the subject, hearings that have been criticized as a political maneuver to delay the legislation and help Republican candidates in an election year.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14011548

HERES SOME REFRESHING, REALISTIC TALK ON IRAQ !!

Zilmer: U.S. 'Stifling' Iraq Insurgency Tuesday, September 12, 2006 (AP) WASHINGTON - A senior American commander in Iraq said Tuesday that U.S.-led military operations are "stifling" the insurgency in western Anbar province but are not strong enough to defeat it.

Marine Maj. Gen. Richard C. Zilmer told reporters in a telephone interview from his headquarters in Fallujah that he has enough U.S. troops - about 30,000 - to accomplish what he called his main mission: training Iraqi security forces. "For what we are trying to achieve out here I think our force levels are about right," he said. Even so, he said the training of Iraqi soldiers and police had not progressed as quickly as once expected. "Now, if that mission statement changes - if there is seen a larger role for coalition forces out here to win that insurgency fight - then that is going to change the metrics of what we need out here," he added.

Zilmer, who has commanded U.S. forces in western Iraq since February, said increasing the number of U.S. troops there would help in the short term, "but at the end of the day I don't think it's going to be the significant change that is necessary to achieve long-term security and stability out here in Anbar." What is needed, he said, is progress on the economic and political fronts that will undercut support for the insurgency.

The situation in Anbar, with its heavily Sunni population, is a barometer for the entire Sunni Arab minority, which lost its favored position to the majority Shiites and the Kurds when Saddam Hussein's regime collapsed in 2003. As long as the insurgency rages, it is unlikely that Sunni Arab politicians in Baghdad can win over significant numbers of Sunnis to support the government of national unity, which took office May 20.

Some areas in Anbar have shown significant progress, such as the border city of Qaim, once an al-Qaida stronghold. Trouble has increased in other areas, like the rural stretch between Ramadi and Fallujah. Insurgent killings of Iraqi police in Fallujah have become commonplace, according to officials there. I think we are winning this war, In the long run, the war will not be won on the battlefield, Zilmer said.

The outcome will be determined by the Iraqis' ability to compromise on their political goals, accommodate their sectarian differences and demonstrate to ordinary people that a democratic central government can serve their needs. "Until those things change, until those long-term effects are realized, then trying to solve the insurgency out here is going to be problematic," he said. White House press secretary Tony Snow said President Bush would be talking to Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, later this week. "If the president gets a recommendation from the combatant commanders to send more troops to al-Anbar province, they will get them," Snow said. As of Monday there were 147,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, the highest number since December 2005.

Most of the recent increase was for Baghdad, where U.S. and Iraqi forces are trying to avert a civil war. Pentagon officials hastily arranged the interview with Zilmer in response to a series of news reports about a classified report by the chief of intelligence for the Marines in western Anbar province, Col. Pete Devlin. Zilmer said he agreed with the assessment by Devlin, who works for Zilmer, and he did not dispute news reports that characterized it as depicting Anbar as locked in a military stalemate with inadequate political progress.

The classified report was first reported by the Washington Post. The New York Times reported Tuesday that the Devlin report concluded that Anbar's political and security situation will continue to deteriorate unless it gets a major infusion of aid and substantially more U.S. troops. Zilmer would not discuss specifics of the Devlin report, but said he did not want more U.S. troops as long as his mission did not include defeating the insurgency.

The Devlin assessment was made in mid-August. Before the telephone interview, Zilmer issued a written and a video statement. "Recent media reports fail to accurately capture the entirety and complexity of the current situation," Zilmer said in his written statement. He added that the assessment "which has been referred to in these reports, was intended to focus on the causes of the insurgency. It was not intended to address the positive effects Coalition and Iraqi forces have achieved on the security environment over the past years." Zilmer acknowledged, however, that "there is an active insurgency in Anbar.

The enemy we face has no concern for the welfare of the Iraqi people, nor any peaceful vision for their future. We believe the Iraqi people want something more and are willing to fight and die for it."

U. S. War against Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, PLO war Against Israel & the U. S. & Allies; Al-Qaida warns Muslims: Time to get out of U.S.

Articles relating to U. S. War against Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, PLO war Against Israel & the U. S. & Allies; Al-Qaida warns Muslims: Time to get out of U.S. in Chronological order, beginning September 14, 2006 from June 27, 2006 as compiled and updated daily by MAIL CALL members and posted here at FOX 6 Forum by Batman for anyone who cares to stay alerted to the future changing daily:

This is how Israel negotiates with terrorists--oohRAH! http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=8971

ALL POINT OF VIEWS HOWEVER ON THIS PAGE ARE BATMANS AND OTHER POINT OF VIEWS ARE WELCOME AND SOMETIMES I ADOPT SOME:

The State of Israel Ministry of Foreign Wars http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa

Historical Excellence; Honoring Patriots who made the Ultimate Sacrifice for Freedom http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?p=136205

PLS PASS ON-Message from Iraq

The proud warriors of Baker Company wanted to do something to pay tribute To our fallen comrades. So since we are part of the only Marine Infantry Battalion left in Iraq the one way that we could think of doing that is By taking a picture of Baker Company saying the way we feel. Semper Fi http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/869751.aspx

Iraq war hurting terror fight, spy agencies say September 23, 2006
Jihadists using conflict as rallying cry, National Intelligence Estimate finds


WASHINGTON - The war in Iraq has become the primary recruitment vehicle for violent Islamic extremists, motivating a new generation of potential terrorists around the world whose numbers are increasing faster than the United States and its allies are eliminating the threat, U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded.

A 30-page National Intelligence Estimate completed in April cites the "centrality" of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and the insurgency that has followed, as the leading inspiration for new Islamic extremist networks and cells that are united by little more than an anti-Western agenda. Rather than contributing to eventual victory in the global counterterrorism struggle, it concludes that the situation in Iraq has worsened the U.S. position, according to officials familiar with the classified document.

"It's a very candid assessment," one intelligence official said yesterday of the estimate, the first formal examination of global terrorist trends written by the National Intelligence Council since the March 2003 invasion. "It's stating the obvious."

At odds with recent Bush speeches

The NIE, whose contents were first reported by the New York Times, coincides with public statements by senior intelligence officials describing a different kind of conflict than the one outlined by President Bush in a series of recent speeches marking the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Together with our coalition partners," Bush said in an address earlier this month to the Military Officers Association of America, "we've removed terrorist sanctuaries, disrupted their finances, killed and captured key operatives, broken up terrorist cells in America and other nations, and stopped new attacks before they're carried out. We're on the offense against the terrorists on every battlefront, and we'll accept nothing less than complete victory."

But the battlefronts intelligence analysts depict are far more impenetrable and difficult, if not impossible, to combat with the standard tools of warfare.

Although intelligence officials agree that the United States has seriously damaged the leadership of al-Qaeda and disrupted its ability to plan and direct major operations, radical Islamic networks have spread and decentralized. Continued http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14975242

Thursday, Sept. 21, 2006 5:32 p.m. EDT Pro-Israel Rally Virtually Ignored at U.N.

The Associated Press, Reuters and many other news organizations reported that a few thousand people took part in a protest against the war in Iraq near the United Nations headquarters on Wednesday. But the mainstream media ignored another, much larger rally taking place outside the U.N., with an estimated 35,000 people expressing their support for Israel and condemning Iranian President Mamoud Ahmadinejad. The main speakers at the rally in Dag Hammerskold Plaza included U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton, who told the cheering, flag-waving crowd that the Bush administration "would not hesitate” to pursue financial sanctions against Iran if it proceeds with its nuclear program. Noble laureate Elie Wiesel chastised the U.N. for ......

U.S. Official Warns on Afghanistan Opium
Saturday, September 2, 2006 (AP)


KABUL, Afghanistan - Afghanistan could be "taken down" by its booming illegal drug trade, a senior U.S. anti-narcotics official warned Saturday, ahead of the scheduled release of U.N. opium crop data expected to show a massive increase in cultivation this year.

Doug Wankel, director of the U.S. anti-narcotics task force in Afghanistan, warned that the illicit trade in opium and heroin threatened the country's fledgling democracy, instituted after the ouster of the hard-line Taliban regime nearly five years ago by U.S.-led forces.

In 2005, Afghanistan produced an estimated 4,500 tons of opium - enough to make 450 tons of heroin.

House Intel Report on Al Qaeda and Terrorism

House Intelligence Committee Releases Report on al-Qaeda: September 20, 2006

"The report addresses how five years after 9-11 al-Qaeda and other radical Islamist organizations remain determined to carry out attacks against the United States, our allies and U.S. interests abroad."

• Al Qaeda: The Many Faces of an Islamist Extremist Threat (40 pages, PDF) • Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice), Ranking Member on the House
Intelligence Committee, today released the following statement regarding declassified "key points" from the National Ground Intelligence Center report on Iraq WMD: "There is nothing new here. Nothing in this report, classified or otherwise, contradicts the Duelfer Report, which assessed that we would find degraded pre-1991 weaponry in Iraq. "When the intelligence community disseminated classified intelligence conclusively establishing that one of the Vice President’s much-touted justifications for war was blatantly wrong, my request to declassify that information was denied." http://intelligence.house.gov/Media/PDFS/Release092006.pdf

General says U.S. may increase troops in Iraq Abizaid: Military likely to maintain force of 147,000 through spring 2007 -AP WASHINGTON -

The U.S. military is likely to maintain and may even increase its force of more than 140,000 troops in Iraq through next spring, the top American commander in the region said Tuesday in one of the gloomiest assessments yet of when troops may come home. Gen. John Abizaid, commander of the U.S. Central Command, said military leaders would consider adding troops or extending the Iraq deployments of other units if needed. Until sectarian violence spiked early this year, Bush administration officials had voiced hopes that this election year would see significant U.S. troop reductions in what has become a widely unpopular war. "If it's necessary to do that because the military situation on the ground requires that, we'll do it," Abizaid said of longer deployments. "If we have to call in more forces because it's our military judgment that we need more forces, we'll do it." Full Story http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14912976

Forces face gangs of violent Iraqi kids as young as 6 AP BAGHDAD, Iraq -

Shiite militias are encouraging children — some as young as 6 or 7 — to hurl stones and gasoline bombs at U.S. convoys, hoping to lure American troops into ambushes or provoke them into shooting back, U.S. soldiers say. Gangs of up to 100 children assemble in Sadr City, stronghold of radical anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army militia, and in nearby neighborhoods, U.S. officers said in interviews this week. American soldiers have seen young men, their faces covered by bandanas, talking with the children before the rock-throwing attacks begin — and sometimes handing out slingshots so the volleys will be more accurate, the troops said. Full Story http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14909189

HOMELAND INSECURITYAl-Qaida warns Muslims: Time to get out of U.S.Afghan terror commander hints at big attack on N.Y., Washington - September 17, 2006; 1:00 a.m. Eastern

The new al-Qaida field commander in Afghanistan is calling for Muslims to leave the U.S. – particularly Washington and New York – in anticipation of a major terror attack to rival Sept. 11, according to an interview by a Pakistani journalist.

Abu Dawood told Hamid Mir, a reporter who has covered al-Qaida and met with Osama bin Laden, the attack is being coordinated by Adnan el-Shukrijumah and suggests it may involve some form of weapon of mass destruction smuggled across the Mexican border.

"Our brothers are ready to attack inside America. We will breach their security again," he is quoted as saying. "There is no timeframe for our attack inside America; we can do it any time."
As WND has previously reported, el-Shukrijumah is a trained nuclear technician and accomplished pilot who has been singled out by bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri to serve as the field commander for the next terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

The terrorist was last seen in Mexico, where, on Nov. 1, 2004, he allegedly hijacked a Piper PA Pawnee cropduster from Ejido Queretaro near Mexicali to transport a nuclear weapon and nuclear equipment into the U.S., according to Paul Williams, a former FBI consultant and author of "The Dunces of Doomsday."

"He is an American and a friend of Muhammad Atta, who led 9/11 attacks five years ago," said Dawood. "We call him 'Jaffer al Tayyar' (Jafer the Pilot); he is very brave and intelligent. (President) Bush is aware that brother Adnan has smuggled deadly materials inside America from the Mexican border. Bush is silent about him, because he doesn’t want to panic his people. Sheikh Osama bin Laden has completed his cycle of warnings. You know, he is man of his words, he is not a politician; he always does what he says. If he said it many times that Americans will see new attacks, they will definitely see new attacks. He is a real mujahid. Americans will not win this war, which they have started against Muslims. Americans are the biggest supporters of the biggest terrorist in the world, which is Israel."

Dawood said he was currently conducting operations in Afghanistan under the leadership of the Taliban. He warned of a series of upcoming suicide bombings there directed against government and coalition forces during Ramadan.

He is also quoted as saying the next attack in America will not be conducted by people like Atta.
"We have a different plan for the next attack," he told Mir. "You will see. Americans will hardly find out any Muslim names, after the next attack. Most of our brothers are living in Western countries, with Jewish and Christian names, with passports of Western countries. This time, someone with the name of Mohamed Atta will not attack inside America, it would be some David, Richard or Peter."

He said there will be another audio message from bin Laden aired within the next two weeks.
Mir reportedly interviewed Dawood Sept. 12 at the tomb of Sultan Mehmud Ghaznawi on the outskirts of Kabul. Dawood and the al-Qaida leaders who accompanied him were clean-shaven and dressed as Western reporters. The al-Qaida commander had contacted Mir by cell phone to arrange the meeting.

"You have witnessed the brutality of the Israelis in the recent 34-day war against Lebanese civilians," said Dawood. "9/11 was a revenge of Palestinian children, killed by the U.S.-made weapons, supplied to Israel. The next attack on America would be a revenge of Lebanese children killed by U.S.-made cluster bombs. Bush and (British Prime Minister Tony) Blair are the Crusaders, and Muslim leaders, like (Pakistani President Pervez) Musharraf and (Afghani President Hamid) Karzai are their collaborators. We will teach a lesson to all of them."

El-Shukrijumah was born in Guyana Aug. 4, 1975 – the firstborn of Gulshair el-Shukrijumah, a 44-year-old radical Muslim cleric, and his 16-year-old wife. In 1985, Gulshair migrated to the United States, where he assumed duties as the imam of the Farouq Mosque in Brooklyn.
The mosque, located at 554 Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, has served as a hive for terrorist activities.

It has raised millions for the jihad and has served as a recruiting station for al-Qaida. Many of the planners of the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, including blind Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, were prominent members of this notorious "house of worship."
In 1995, the Shukrijumah family relocated to Miramar, Fla., where Gulsha

ir became the spiritual leader of the radical Masjid al-Hijah Mosque, and where Adnan became friends with Jose Padilla, who planned to detonate a radiological bomb in midtown Manhattan; Mandhai Jokhan, who was convicted of attempting to blow up nuclear power plants in southern Florida; and a group of other home-grown terrorists.

Adnan Shukrijumah attended flight schools in Florida and Norman, Oklahoma, along with Mohammad Atta and the other 9/11 operatives, and he became a highly skilled commercial jet pilot, although he, like Atta and the other terrorists, never applied for a license with the Federal Aviation Commission.

In April 2001, Shukrijumah spent 10 days in Panama, where he reportedly met with al-Qaida officials to assist in the planning of 9/11. He also traveled to Trinidad and Guyana, where virulent al-Qaida cells have been established. The following month, he obtained an associate's degree in computer engineering from Broward Community College.

During this time, he managed to get passports from Guyana, Trinidad, Saudi Arabia, Canada and the United States, according to Williams. He also began to adopt a number of aliases, including Abu Arifi, Jafar al-Tayyar, Jaafar At Yayyar, Ja'far al-Tayar, and Mohammed Sher Mohammed Khan (the name that appeared on his official FBI file). He traveled to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, where he met with Ramzi Binalshibh, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and other members of the al-Qaida high command. He also spent considerable time within al-Qaida camps in Afghanistan, where he received training in explosives and special operations.

Following 9/11, el-Shukrijumah was reportedly singled out by bin Laden and al-Zawahiri to spearhead the next great attack on America. One plan was for a nuclear attack that would take place simultaneously in seven U.S. cities, leaving millions dead and the richest and most powerful nation on earth in ashes.

"Muslims should leave America," said Dawood. "We cannot stop our attack just because of the American Muslims; they must realize that American forces are killing innocent Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq; we have the right to respond back, in the same manner, in the enemy's homeland. The American Muslims are like a human shield for our enemy; they must leave New York and Washington."

Mir, the journalist, has reported previously that al-Qaida has smuggled nuclear weapons and uranium into the U.S.

"I am saying that Muslims must leave America, but we can attack America anytime," he said. "Our cycle of warnings has been completed, now we have fresh edicts from some prominent Muslim scholars to destroy our enemy, this is our defending of Jihad; the enemy has entered in our homes and we have the right to enter in their homes, they are killing us, we will kill them."

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52018

American Muslims Told to Leave Major U.S. Cities

Titled "A Warning to Muslims in America," the directive was issued by the previously unknown "Islamic Bayan Movement" and first ran on the Global Islamic Media Web site on Monday, according to MEMRI, which translated the communiqué.

It has since been published on the Al Qaeda-run site Al Faroq (search), a MEMRI release said. The Global Islamic Media site has published several messages from Jihad groups around the world in recent months.

As of Tuesday, there had been no increase in the Pentagon's yellow terror alert status. Yellow represents an "elevated" status on the five-point chart.
"Our Muslim brothers in America, we ask you to immediately leave the following cities: Washington, D.C., New York, and Los Angeles," reads the communiqué, which frequently quotes the Quran.

"We are serious in our warning," the message states. "The next few days will prove to you the truth of this warning … To the oppressive rulers of America we say: Expect our terms following the first strike of Allah's believing soldiers [Quran, Chapter 59, Verse 2-3]."

The directive claims that U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan "are the only ones who know the bitter truth" about the situation overseas.

"How would they not when they see every day dozens of casualties from among their friends, the soldiers who die and nobody, even not their stupid rulers, is sorry for them," the communiqué states. "Then they hear the lies and distortion their rulers [tell] their people and the peoples of the world regarding the number of their dead …"

The communiqué refers to the "sufferings" of Muslims, saying they are victims of oppression, imprisonment and murder.

It ends with another verse from the Quran [Chapter 9, Verse 14]: "Fight them: Allah will punish them at your hands, and will humiliate them, and will help you to overcome them, and will relieve the minds of the believers."

In conjunction with the memo, Al Qaeda's Al Faroq posted a photo of the Chinook helicopter shot down on Sunday with a caption in Arabic that reads: "We shall bring down and destroy the values of the Hubal of this generation." Fifteen Americans died in the helicopter attack.

Hubal was a pre-Islamic-era Meccan idol used by Muslims to symbolize the U.S., according to MEMRI.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102179,00.html

Muslims want apologies for the Pope's reading of factual writings.

Well consider this. Every time, in your mosques, in your holy places, in your homes, they talk about how decadent the west is, how they must wage jihad against us, kill unbelievers, Israel is the little satan, the US the big satan, that we are pigs and swines. And yes, the pope back in the 12th century did order crusades. Why? Because of muslims besieging Lebanon and killing pelgrims on their way to the Holy Land. And yes, we are informed about islam. Every day we can see what islam does to woman, people in Sudan, people in Israel, terrorism, group-raping of infidel woman. Every day islam insults us, and never ever they feel the need to apologize. They blow up planes in our buildings and then they say we caused it ourselves by being decadent westerns. Some even rejoice (yes the Palestinian people to name some) if 3000 of our people die. And now they want apologies? Everything is about the slights they perceive. TRUTH hurts. I have learned that not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Muslims. The riots they have started , the burning of Christian Churches and killing of anyone who is not muslim should be enough to show the world that the Pope was Right. They are showing us everyday that they are intolerent and violent in nature. Where does that come from? They say they are a religion of peace. Okay where is the peace? I have something to say to these so called peaceful people. Words are trivial at best. Actions speak louder than words. You can scream everyday about being a religion of peace but as long as you live by sharia law I will see you as you really are. Violent religious fanatics who want to see the death of everyone who is not muslim. Yes some of we so called infidels do know what sharia law is. The sharia law in it's self is an inhumane way for people to be expected to live. Mohamad was the first terrorist because he wrote sharia law. No man, woman or child would be subject to this type of inhumane treatment in the eyes of any GOD who loves his children.

Last edited by KentuckyGirl68 on Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:47 pm; Master Sergeant NCOIC Veterans Affairs Sound Off Forum/Membership Support

Life must be lived forward but remembered backward.......

George Washington We have enough youth, how about a fountain of smart?...... Rush Limbaugh

By Patrick Goodenough CNSNews.com International Editor September 05, 2006 (CNSNews.com) - Australian Muslim representatives are voicing outrage at comments by the country's two top politicians, who urged immigrants from Islamic societies to fit in, learn English, treat women with respect, and shun extremism. An Islamic leader warned that the remarks could antagonize Muslims and lead to a repeat of incidents such as the rioting in a Sydney beachside suburb last December, when groups of youngsters -- described as having a Middle Eastern background -- fought with whites. Prime Minister John Howard late last week said migrants should integrate into the way of life in their new country but that a minority of Muslims was opposed to accepting Australia's values. "Fully integrating means accepting Australian values -- it means .... http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewForeignBureaus.asp?Page=/ForeignBureaus/arc

West Bank Churches Burned in Light of Muslim Anger Over Papal Comments http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,214195,00.html

Father Johnathon has some thoughts: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,214338,00.html

WASHINGTON - The threat of terrorism against the United States remains chillingly lethal five years after 9/11, and officials predict another massive attack is not a matter of if - but when. Despite a government overhaul and more than $250 billion spent to bolster security on airlines, at borders and in seaports, few doubt al-Qaida's intent to strike the U.S. again. That the nation hasn't been hit since Sept. 11, 2001, may say as much about terrorists' patience as it does about steps taken to stop them. "I know of nobody in the intelligence field who doesn't believe there will be another attack," said Thomas Kean, former New Jersey governor and Republican chair of the 9/11 Commission that investigated the government's security missteps leading up to the 2001 hijackings. "There's going to be another attack," Kean said. "They just can't tell you when." In a new age of rapid and widespread ID checks, locked and bulletproof cockpit doors in airliners, armed pilots, tracking foreigners' visas and monitoring Muslim and Arab communities, few expect a precise repeat of the plot that used airline hijackings to bring down big buildings. The unsettling reality of terrorism, however, is that it is always in search of new ways to accomplish mass death and destruction. And always in search of the weakest link. http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,113041,00.html?ESRC=dod-bz

September 23, 2006

Lebanese army on Israel border for first time in decades http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060923/wl_afp/mideastconflictlebanon_060

Hamas Rebuffs Palestinian President Over Israel http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/world/middleeast/23mideast.html?ref=

West bars Arab bid at IAEA to rap Israel atom "threat" http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060922/wl_nm/nuclear_mideast_iaea_dc_2

Hamas and Abbas remain at odds over Israel Palestinian PM won't recognize Israel - Fri Sep 22, 11:26 AM EThttp://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060922/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians

15 Arab nations push for condemnation of Israel's nuclear activities - Fri Sep 22, 5:55 PM ET http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/wl_mideast_afp/iaeanuclearpolitics_060922160402
Hezbollah leader praises 'divine victory' over Israel - Fri Sep 22, 11:55 AM ET http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/ts_afp/mideastconflictlebanon_060

Hamas defies Abbas on Israel recognition - Fri Sep 22, 9:21 AM ET http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/ts_afp/mideastpalestinian_060922130408

Outnumbered and short of food, British troops win six-day battle with Taliban By Tom Coghlan in Kabul - (Filed: 22/09/2006)

"Situation critical." The young British bombardier spoke urgently into the handset of his radio above the crack of small arms around him and the heavier thud of rocket-propelled grenades.

The radio antennae on the jeep beside him abruptly cartwheeled away and an RPG round sailed gracefully five feet overhead. "Incoming mortar and RPG rounds getting closer and more accurate. Situation critical," he repeated. As the bombardment continued, Bombardier Sam New from 7 Para Royal Horse Artillery, began to feed complex sets of grid references to the disjointed voices of American and British close air support pilots circling high above Helmand.

Then the line went dead. A bullet had severed the cord attaching it to the radio set. Last week, 17 British soldiers, 10 Estonian infantrymen, 100 Afghan army and 100 Afghan police took part in a joint Nato operation to retake the dusty desert town of Garmser in southern Helmand. The town, which sits on the Helmand river, has fallen to the Taliban twice since July and is strategically important because it is the southern-most point of government control. When the fighting finally finished earlier this week, ...... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=?xml=/news/2006/

Israeli soldiers want probe of Lebanon fighting - Hundreds sign petition calling for inquiry into how Israel conducted the war

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14434420

Israel urged to give more info on bombs http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_cluster_bombs_1 I

srael cluster bomb use in Lebanon "outrageous": UN http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060919/ts_nm/mideast_lebanon_cluster_dc_3

United States, Israel reach out to Abbas http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_mideast_6

Israel seeks to reopen dialogue with Abbas http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians_8

Israel to withdraw all troops by weekend http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_6

Herzl's children, buried in France, to be moved to Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060919/en_afp/franceisraeljewsherzl_0609

US, Israel caution Abbas over unity deal with Hamas http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060919/pl_afp/mideastpalestinianisraelun_060919140500

Israel wants permanent Abbas dialogue http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians_10

Israel indicts 3 members of Hezbollah http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-09-18-israel-hezbollah_x.htm?csp=34

Mubarak says Israel could free many Palestinians http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060918/wl_nm/mideast_prisoners_egypt_dc_1

Israel considers freeing prisoners if Palestinian gov't moderates its views http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-09-18-israel-palestine_x.htm?csp=34

Hezbollah to mark 'victory' over Israel(in what fantasy world?) http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-09-17-hezbollah-rally_x.h

Nonaligned Nations Blast Israel Attacks http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2454256&CMP=OTC-RSSFe

ABC News: Nonaligned Nations Blast Israel Attacks After its war with Israel, Hezbollah is at odds with Lebanon's government http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-09-16-lebanon-hezbollah_x.htm?

One wounded after Gaza militants fire rockets into Israel

Since the second Palestinian uprising broke out in 2000, Gaza militants have fired more than 1,000 rockets into Israel. The salvoes have killed eight people, including three children, and wounded dozens of others inside Israel, according to the army.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060917/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictgaz

Abbas delays unity talks over Hamas Israel stance http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/17/news/freeze.php

Treasury Warns G-7 About Iran http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/16/AR2006

Petrol-hungry Iran still eyeing rationing http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060916/bs_afp/iranenergyoilrationing_060

Paulson Says G-7 Alert to Alleged Illegal Financial Activities by Iran and North Korea http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060916/singapore_g7_meeting_paulson.html?.v=3

Bush seeks Iran, Sudan action at UN http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060916/ts_alt_afp/unassemblyusbush_06091

US calls for G7 offensive on Iran 'terrorist' backing http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060916/wl_mideast_afp/usg7attackssanctio

Iran dismisses US religious rights concerns http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060916/wl_mideast_afp/iranusreligionrigh

Japan banks to refrain from deals with Iran bank: reports http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060916/wl_asia_afp/japanirannuclearpolit%20icsbanking_060916100903

US slams Iran, chides Israel and other allies over lack of religious freedoms http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060915/pl_afp/usreligionrights_060915165

UEFA lift home tie ban on Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060915/sp_wl_afp/fbleur2008isruefa_06091

Israel: 18 Hamas Lawmakers to Stay in Jail http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/world/middleeast/15briefs-003.html&OQ=_rQ3D1&OP=1b9b238bQ2FPyQ2FtP6!Q5BQ 23X!!bQ3EPQ3EsscPsQ22PQ3ANPy!XA6PQ51Q5C66AQ2FQ2FYQ23bPQ3ANtXQ5CQ2FQ5DQ 23Q24ssD.Q7CbQ51

A Roundup: UEFA lifts ban on games in Israel http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/15/sports/world.php

Nobel Peace Prize recipient Wiesel urges U.N. to expel Iran http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-09-14-wiesel-iran_x.htm?csp=3

Elie Wiesel calls on U.N. to expel Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060914/ap_on_re_us/us_iran_wiesel_1

US: Fight for sanctions on Iran will be tough, take weeks http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060914/pl_afp/irannuclearpoliticsun_0609

UN asks Israel to dismantle barrier in Lebanon http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060914/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictleb

Al-Qaida Joins Algerians Against France Thursday, September 14, 2006 (AP) PARIS - Al-Qaida has for the first time announced a union with an Algerian insurgent group that has designated France as an enemy, saying they will act together against French and American interests. Current and former French officials specializing in terrorism said Thursday that an al-Qaida alliance with the Salafist Group for Call and Combat, known by its French initials GSPC, was cause for concern. "We take these threats very seriously," Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said, adding in an interview on France-2 television that the threat to France was "high" and "permanent," and that "absolute vigilance" was required.

Al-Qaida's No. 2, Ayman al-Zawahri, announced the "blessed union" in a video posted this week on the Internet to mark the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States. France's leader have repeatedly warned that the decision not to join the U.S.-led war in Iraq would not shield the country from Islamic terrorism.

French participation in the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Lebanon could give extremists another reason to strike. The national police had no immediate comment on the announced alliance, but officials have long regarded the GSPC as one of the main terror threats facing France. French experts agreed, but also noted the group has been severely weakened by internal divisions, security crackdowns and defections in Algeria, a former French territory still working to put down an Islamic insurgency that reached its most murderous heights in the 1990s.

"The GSPC is losing speed and has suffered very significant losses in recent months," said Louis Caprioli, former assistant director of France's DST counterterrorism and counterintelligence agency. Some GSPC fighters took advantage of a recent Algerian amnesty for Islamic insurgents and others have been killed, said Caprioli, who works for Geos, a risk management firm. Of the 800 combatants that GSPC was estimated to have had last year, probably no more than 500 remain, and the group has had no operational cells in France since the late 1990s, he said.

But Caprioli and others also said an alliance of GSPC and al-Qaida could increase the terror risk for France - not least because al-Zawahri's designation of the country as a worthy target could inspire extremists to take action. In his video, Al-Zawahri hailed "the joining up" of the GSPC with al-Qaida as "good news."

"All the praise is due to Allah for the blessed union which we ask Allah to be as a bone in the throats of the Americans and French Crusaders and their allies, and inspire distress, concern and dejection in the hearts of the traitorous, apostate sons of France," he said.

"We ask him (Allah) to guide our brothers in the Salafist Group for Call and Combat to crush the pillars of the Crusader alliance, especially their elderly immoral leader, America." Although GSPC leaders had previously sworn allegiance to al-Qaida, al-Zawahri's video marked the first al-Qaida recognition of a union between the two, French terror experts said.

"From now on, the links are official, legitimate, and they are taking part in the same combat," said Anne Giudicelli, a former French diplomat specializing in the Middle East who runs the Paris-based consultancy Terrorisc. Sarkozy said it was "not by chance" that al-Qaida used the emblematic Sept. 11 date to announce the insurgency movement's alliance with al-Qaida. "But there is nothing new," he added, noting that the GSPC had done the same three years ago.

The GSPC, in its own statement on a Web site used by militants, confirmed the alliance and urged other militant groups to also join al-Qaida. Giudicelli said the alliance could act as a green light for al-Qaida and GSPC militants to operate together and thus raises the risk for France. "The Americans have become harder to target domestically, so they are trying to widen the field of action and strike their allies," she said.

No Lebanon-Israel contact possible: Siniora http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060914/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictleb

U.S., Israel eye-to-eye on Mideast peace http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060914/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_mideast_12

Amnesty International: Hezbollah committed war crimes against Israel http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-09-14-amnesty-hezbollah_x.htm?csp=34

Israel Skeptical of Hamas-Fatah 'Unity Government' http://www.crosswalk.com/news/1423473.html

Al Qaeda threatens attacks in Gulf and Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/wl_nm/security_qaeda_zawahri_dc_15

Al-Qaeda Calls on Muslims To Fight in Lebanon, Israel http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/11/AR2006

Zilmer: U.S. 'Stifling' Iraq Insurgency Tuesday, September 12, 2006 (AP) WASHINGTON - A senior American commander in Iraq said Tuesday that U.S.-led military operations are "stifling" the insurgency in western Anbar province but are not strong enough to defeat it.

Marine Maj. Gen. Richard C. Zilmer told reporters in a telephone interview from his headquarters in Fallujah that he has enough U.S. troops - about 30,000 - to accomplish what he called his main mission: training Iraqi security forces.

"For what we are trying to achieve out here I think our force levels are about right," he said. Even so, he said the training of Iraqi soldiers and police had not progressed as quickly as once expected.

"Now, if that mission statement changes - if there is seen a larger role for coalition forces out here to win that insurgency fight - then that is going to change the metrics of what we need out here," he added.

Zilmer, who has commanded U.S. forces in western Iraq since February, said increasing the number of U.S. troops there would help in the short term, "but at the end of the day I don't think it's going to be the significant change that is necessary to achieve long-term security and stability out here in Anbar."

What is needed, he said, is progress on the economic and political fronts that will undercut support for the insurgency. The situation in Anbar, with its heavily Sunni population, is a barometer for the entire Sunni Arab minority, which lost its favored position to the majority Shiites and the Kurds when Saddam Hussein's regime collapsed in 2003.

As long as the insurgency rages, it is unlikely that Sunni Arab politicians in Baghdad can win over significant numbers of Sunnis to support the government of national unity, which took office May 20. Some areas in Anbar have shown significant progress, such as the border city of Qaim, once an al-Qaida stronghold.

Trouble has increased in other areas, like the rural stretch between Ramadi and Fallujah. Insurgent killings of Iraqi police in Fallujah have become commonplace, according to officials there.

I think we are winning this war, In the long run, the war will not be won on the battlefield, Zilmer said. The outcome will be determined by the Iraqis' ability to compromise on their political goals, accommodate their sectarian differences and demonstrate to ordinary people that a democratic central government can serve their needs.

"Until those things change, until those long-term effects are realized, then trying to solve the insurgency out here is going to be problematic," he said. White House press secretary Tony Snow said President Bush would be talking to Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, later this week.

"If the president gets a recommendation from the combatant commanders to send more troops to al-Anbar province, they will get them," Snow said. As of Monday there were 147,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, the highest number since December 2005.

Most of the recent increase was for Baghdad, where U.S. and Iraqi forces are trying to avert a civil war. Pentagon officials hastily arranged the interview with Zilmer in response to a series of news reports about a classified report by the chief of intelligence for the Marines in western Anbar province, Col. Pete Devlin.

Zilmer said he agreed with the assessment by Devlin, who works for Zilmer, and he did not dispute news reports that characterized it as depicting Anbar as locked in a military stalemate with inadequate political progress.

The classified report was first reported by the Washington Post. The New York Times reported Tuesday that the Devlin report concluded that Anbar's political and security situation will continue to deteriorate unless it gets a major infusion of aid and substantially more U.S. troops.

Zilmer would not discuss specifics of the Devlin report, but said he did not want more U.S. troops as long as his mission did not include defeating the insurgency. The Devlin assessment was made in mid-August. Before the telephone interview, Zilmer issued a written and a video statement.

"Recent media reports fail to accurately capture the entirety and complexity of the current situation," Zilmer said in his written statement. He added that the assessment "which has been referred to in these reports, was intended to focus on the causes of the insurgency.

It was not intended to address the positive effects Coalition and Iraqi forces have achieved on the security environment over the past years." Zilmer acknowledged, however, that "there is an active insurgency in Anbar.

The enemy we face has no concern for the welfare of the Iraqi people, nor any peaceful vision for their future. We believe the Iraqi people want something more and are willing to fight and die for it."

Palestinian govt won't object to Abbas-Israel talks http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/ts_nm/mideast_palestinians_dc_15

Hezbollah militants broke international law by firing thousands of rockets into Israel and killing dozens of civilians during the recent conflict with Israel, Amnesty International charged Thursday. The human rights group called for a United Nations inquiry into what it called war crimes by Israel and Hezbollah, but its report focused on the actions of the Lebanese militants during the 34-day conflict. Hezbollah launched nearly 4,000 rockets into northern Israel in July and August, killing at least 39 civilians. The firing of rockets into urban areas in northern Israel disregarded international laws that call for distinguishing between civilian and military targets, Amnesty said. "Targeting civilians is a war crime. There's no gray area," said Larry Cox, Amnesty's executive director in the United States. Although Hezbollah denies targeting Israeli civilians, it fired inaccurate rockets packed with thousands of metal ball bearings to maximize harm to non-combatants, Amnesty said. Hezbollah had no immediate comment Thursday on the Amnesty report.

Earthquake shakes Israel, no injuries reported http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060909/wl_nm/quake_israel_dc_1

Israel Ends Its Blockade of Lebanon’s Coastline http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/09/world/middleeast/09lebanon.html&OQ=_rQ3D1Q26refQ3Dmiddleeast&OP=153c2ec9Q2FQ3EtSQ3CQ3EK0FQ3DO00MwQ3EwBBEQ3EBpQ3EBpQ3Et0OYKQ3EDQ20KKYSS(Q3DMQ3E BpYSQ3C(v0vQ5Db

MDY Shipping returns to Beirut after Israel ends blockade http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060909/wl_afp/mideastconflictlebanonport

Israel reopens sea lanes to Lebanon after 8 weeks Italian ships now guarding against any arms shipments http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/09/MNGL4L28FH1.DTL&feed=rss.news

Israel lifting Lebanon sea blockade http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/ts_afp/mideastconflict_0609081234

Israel lifts Lebanon blockade amid flurry of diplomacy http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/ts_afp/mideastconflictisrael_0609

Israel minister says time for Palestinian talks http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060908/wl_nm/mideast_palestinians_dc_2

Russian FM slams Israel arrest of Palestinian ministers, MPs http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictpalestinianisraelrussiadiplomacy_060908142408
This was how Israeli IDF takes care of business as usual, regardless of what people are saying in Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and everywhere else. http://www.combatvids.com/showvideo.php?id=2098

This was how Israel took out Hezbollah missile sites in Lebanon. Not a very long video, but clear enough and to the point...LOL http://www.combatvids.com/showvideo.php?id=2172

Israel Plans Border FencePublished: 9/7/2006 11:31:39 AM

http://www.fox6.com/news/middleeast/story.aspx?content_id=8C4E6145-086A-4831-9F5D-3369AF367D28

Israel says to lift Lebanon blockade on Thursday http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060906/ts_nm/mideast_dc_429

Israel lifting blockade of Lebanon http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-09-06-mideast-blockade_x.htm?csp=34

Israel to lift Lebanon blockade at 1500 GMT Thursday http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060906/ts_afp/mideastconflictlebanonisra

Lebanon demands prisoner swap for Israel soldiers (Like that'll happen, Ha Ha!) http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060906/wl_nm/lebanon_prisoners_dc_1

ANDAHAR, Afghanistan - U.S. artillery and airstrikes killed between 50 and 60 suspected Taliban militants Tuesday, as NATO's civilian chief warned that insurgency-wracked Afghanistan could again become a failed state if the international community loses the battle to stabilize it. The U.S. troops, operating under NATO command, clashed with the militants in Panjwayi district of Kandahar province, where an offensive began over the weekend to flush out hundreds of Taliban fighters. NATO has already reported more than 200 Taliban killed in the operation. Maj. Quentin Innis, a NATO spokesman, said the troops had identified Taliban positions and the two sides had exchanged fire. He said the estimate of 50 to 60 killed in Tuesday's fighting was based on reports from troops looking through "weapons sights and other observation devices."

He said there had been no NATO or Afghan troop casualties. It wasn't possible for reporters to reach the site of the battle to independently confirm the death toll. A Panjwayi district council member, Haji Agha Lalai, said bombings by NATO warplanes have killed 21 civilians over the past three days in an area called Zungawad. NATO spokesman Maj. Scott Lundy said he had no immediate details to support Lalai's claims. The bloody contest between resurgent Taliban militants and U.S. and NATO forces has left hundreds dead in each of the past four months - the deadliest spate of violence since the pro-al-Qaida Taliban regime's 2001 ouster. The latest clashes came as NATO's leaders and diplomats were in Afghanistan to sign a security and development accord with President Hamid Karzai and to assess progress in the alliance's mission to tame the volatile south. "The fight must be won and will be won," NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer told reporters. "We should win because not winning means Afghanistan becoming a failed state again."

De Hoop Scheffer acknowledged that NATO forces had met stiffer resistance than expected since they took command of the south from a U.S.-led coalition a month ago. "The spoilers are testing out NATO to see if NATO is as robust as the coalition. The answer as we now see is, 'Yes.'" The Afghan Defense Ministry on Tuesday said 200 militants have died since Saturday - increasing its previously reported toll of 89. The dead included four Taliban commanders and 12 of their bodyguards, a ministry statement said, citing intelligence reports. No further details were available. Five Canadian soldiers have also been killed, one in "friendly fire" by a U.S. warplane Monday. Mullah Dadullah, the Taliban military commander for south and southeastern Afghanistan, on Monday rejected NATO's claim of over 200 dead. Qari Yousaf Ahmadi, who claims to speak for the Taliban, said Tuesday that if NATO had killed so many Taliban fighters, they should show them to the media. He also denied NATO claims that hundreds of militants were trapped in Panjwayi, and said its fighters were inflicting casualties on NATO and Afghan forces.

He spoke to an Associated Press reporter by phone from an undisclosed location. Lundy, the NATO spokesman, said earlier Tuesday that an estimated 700 militants were "trapped" in an area spanning several hundred square kilometers (miles) in Panjwayi and Zhari districts, some in fortified compounds, others moving in the open. NATO has also reported that 80 Taliban have been arrested and a further 180 have fled the fighting. "It's a complex battle space. Some (Taliban) elements are fixed, others are moving," Lundy said. The alliance has so far not confirmed any civilian casualties during Operation Medusa in Panjwayi, saying residents had evacuated before it began Saturday, as NATO had dropped leaflets and made public announcements in the preceding days advising them to leave the area. But a hospital in Kandahar on Tuesday reported that a boy and girl had been killed and at least nine other civilians have been treated for injuries from the fighting since Sunday.

ABC News: PM: Israel Must Renew Palestinian Talks http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2394291&CMP=OTC-RSSFe

Hezbollah and Israel to discuss prisoners http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/04/news/annan.php

Lebanon to protest Israel's blockade http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060905/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_lebanon_blo

Israel forces leave 5 Lebanese villages http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060905/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_23

Ayatollah Jannati Praises Hizbollah Role In Lebanese Victory Over Israel (Yeah, Rite!) http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-236/0609015411175439.htm

Palestinian Militants Fire Rockets At Israel http://www.canada.com/cityguides/winnipeg/info/story.html?id=70ee5460-

Israel Pulls Back Troops In Lebanon http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/15412305.htm?source=rs

Minister Rejects Jewish Criticism Over Israel Remarks http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,2153450,00.html?maca=en-rss-en-all-1124-rdf

Israel Ready To Talk To Lebanon Over Prisoner Release http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060831/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictisr

Israel Turns Over 'Part' Of Border Zone http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060831/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_54

Iraqi Command Assumes Control of 8th Iraqi Army Division
American Forces Press Service

BAGHDAD, Sep. 1, 2006 – The Iraqi Ground Forces Command assumed command and control here today of one of its Iraqi army divisions from the Multinational Corps Iraq, marking what officials here said is the first step toward Iraqi sovereignty over the country’s armed forces.

The 8th Iraqi Army Division, commanded by Maj. Gen Othman Ali Salih Farhood, which had been a subordinate unit of Multinational Division Baghdad, will now report directly to the IGFC as an adjacent unit to MND-B. When the division took the lead for operations in its sector on Jan. 27, it was the first to reach that milestone.

In a gradual sequence over the following months, the IGFC will assume control of the remaining nine Iraqi Army divisions, officials said.

The IGFC was established May 15, 2005, as the corps-level command for providing command, control and guidance to the 10 Iraqi Army divisions. Over the past year, MNC-I worked closely with the IGFC in a partnership to develop procedures, training and infrastructure that enables the IGFC to effectively command and control maneuver units to provide for Iraq’s security, officials said.

Later this week, the IFGC will join the Iraqi air force and the navy in a formal ceremony marking the transition of operational control of Iraqi armed forces from the coalition to the Iraqi government.

Four months ago, the IGFC officially opened its Joint Operations Center, a modern command center in which all elements of the headquarters staff are represented, to monitor and process data from throughout Iraq in real time.

Today’s assumption of control by the IGFC demonstrates the increased capability of the Iraqi Army to assume control of security tasks and is another significant step toward Iraqi security self-reliance, Multinational Corps Iraq officials said today in a written statement.
(From a Multinational Corps Iraq news release.)

Annan Prods Israel To Lift Siege, 'Blockade' http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060831/wl_nm/mideast_dc_381

Israel Rebuffs Annan Demand On Blockade http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060831/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_52

Amnesty International's Biased Definition of War Crimes: Whatever Israel Does To Defend Its Citizens http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/amnesty-internationals-b

Annan Arrives In Israel To Discuss Ending Blockade (Ha ha ha!) http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=aXRjCsMhSnD8

Annan Urges Quick End To Israel;Hibollah Disputes http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060829/wl_nm/mideast_dc_354

Angry Ronaldhino Denies Israel-Lebanon Claims http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060829/sp_soccer_afp/fblespbramar_060829151458

Israel Denies Negotiations With Hezbollah http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060828/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictisr

UN Chief Urges Hezbollah To Release Israeli Soldiers; Israel To Lift Blockade http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/28082006/2/world-un-chief-urges-hezbollah-r

Observers Proposed For Israel-Gaza Area http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-08-28-gaza-observers_x.htm?csp

Israel Watchdog Issues Report On Olmert http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060828/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_olmert_7

At least Israel is acknowledging their points, but what about Hezbollah? They are now refusing to disarm, which was part of the U.N. Mandate that was passed earlier in order for U.N. troops to deploy on the southern Lebanon border. Now, Hassan says for the U.N. not to try to disarm Hezbollah because its "too big a job for the U.N. and Israel to do." As far as the two Israeli prisoners in Lebanon, give up two of the Lebanese prisoners for the two Israeli prisoners. Now take the time to watch the next video, it may be long, but it's very, very interesting. This is why arab countries won't attack Israel. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2395002075547394719&q=label%3Azionism

Israel Struggles With Targeted Killings, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14536281/

Israel Struggles With Targeted Killings-(What's there to struggle about?) http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14536281

Egypt Reports Deal On Israel-Hezbollah Prisoner Swap http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060827/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictleb

Syria Will Talk Peace "When Israel Is Ready" http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060827/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictsyriaisrael_060827145516
Irans Hitler !!! Pure EVIL http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v66/yodaz/EVIL/Ahmad1.jpg

Ahmadinejad "has often stated his true intentions concerning Israel," he said, a reference to repeated calls by the Iranian president for the country's destruction. Ahmadinejad said Saturday that "one cannot deprive any nation from its rights. The Iranian nation will defend its rights to nuclear technology with force."

Israel Seeks Troops From Muslim Nations http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060826/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_peacekeeper

Israel 'Not Fooled' By Iran's Nuclear Assurances http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060826/wl_mideast_afp/iranpoliticsnuclea

Israel & Lebanon Hail EU Troop Pledge http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060826/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflict_060826132736

Germany Confirms Sale Of Two Submarines To Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060825/wl_mideast_afp/mideastisraelgerma

US Investigating Cluster Bomb Use By Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060825/pl_afp/mideastconflictisrael_0608

Chavez Says Israel's Action "Worse" Than Hitler's http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060825/wl_mideast_afp/chinamideastconfli

Israel Buys 2 Nuclear Capable Submarines http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060825/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_deterring_iran_13

Mark Regev, the spokesman for Israel's Foreign Ministry, categorically rejected the claim that Israel had "acted outside international norms or international legality concerning the rules of war." Unlike Hezbollah, he said, Israel did not target the civilian population, nor did it indiscriminately target Lebanese civilian infrastructure. He added: "Our job was made very difficult by the fact that Hezbollah adopted a deliberate policy of positioning itself inside civilian areas and breaking the first fundamental distinction under the rules of war, by deliberately endangering civilians. Under the rules of war, you are legally entitled to target infrastructure that your enemy is exploiting for its military campaign." Citing a variety of sources, the Amnesty International report said Israel's air force had carried out more than 7,000 air attacks, while the navy had fired 2,500 shells. The human toll, according to Lebanese government statistics, was estimated at 1,183 deaths, mostly civilians, (mostly pezbola terriorists Dressed As Civilians !) about a third of them children; 4,054 wounded; and 970,000 people displaced, out of a population of a little under four million.

Lebanon Plays Down Israel-Syria Dispute Over Troops http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060824/ts_nm/mideast_dc_303

Israel Can Ask Itself Questions...Why Can't America? (Get Real, So-Called Journalists) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-alterman/israel-can-ask-itself-har_

Human Rights Group Accuse Israel Of War Crimes (What About Hezbollah?) http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/24/africa/web.0824lebanon.php

Israeli Soldiers Move Into Gaza Associated Press August 24, 2006 JERUSALEM - Israeli forces crossed into the Gaza Strip early Thursday in a raid that captured a local Hamas militant leader and left his brother dead near a Gaza border town, Palestinians witnesses and officials said. As the forces - backed by tanks and helicopter gunships - moved into the area of Abasan and took up positions on rooftops, militants began firing at them, sparking gunbattles that wounded two militants, Palestinian officials said. Hamas officials identified the captured man as Younis Abu Daka, a local Hamas leader. His brother, Yousef, was killed in the fighting, the militant group said. The army confirmed that a senior Hamas operative was arrested, and at least one militant was killed. It did not identify the men. The violence came as Israel continued its offensive in the Gaza Strip, which it began June 28, three days after Hamas-linked militants tunneled into Israel, attacked an Israeli army post and captured a soldier, Cpl. Gilad Shalit. Israel said it would maintain its offensive until Shalit was released and militants ceased firing rockets into Israel.

The army has routinely carried out nighttime raids into Gaza since the offensive began. Israel has killed more than 200 Palestinians - most of them militants - since the offensive began two months ago. Palestinian officials fear that Israel, after battling Hezbollah guerrillas to a stalemate in Lebanon, now turn its attention back on Gaza. Late Wednesday, an Israeli tank fired a shell at two men who approached Gaza's border fence with Israel near Abasan, according to Palestinian officials and the army.

Ambulance crews found one wounded person, an Islamic Jihad militant, in the area and were searching for others. The army said soldiers identified two suspicious men crawling toward the border post, fired a tank shell at them. Also Wednesday, a top Palestinian militant leader in the West Bank was shot in the head and seriously wounded, militants and hospital officials said. Hospital officials said Hossam Jaradat, the West Bank leader of Islamic Jihad's militant wing, was shot by Israeli soldiers in the Jenin refugee camp. But Islamic Jihad said they were not sure Israel was behind the shooting. The Israeli army said it had no information on the report. Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion.

You can believe this if you want to:

Lebanon vows toughness on truce - September 24, 2006?

Earlier Sunday, the Lebanese government vowed to crush any attempt on the Lebanese side to breach the truce in the conflict with Israel, a day after the U.N. condemned an Israeli raid on Hezbollah as a truce violation.

“The army will be very tough in dealing with such an issue,” Lebanese Defense Minister Elias al-Murr told a news conference. Murr said Sunday he is certain Hezbollah will not break the cease-fire, but said that “any rocket fired from Lebanon will benefit Israel,” suggesting such an incident would provide a pretext for Israel to attack Lebanon.

Murr’s strong remarks indicated concern that Syrian-backed Palestinian militants might try to restart the fighting by drawing retaliation from Israel. Murr said the army now controlled the entire border with Syria and would crack down on arms shipments. “There is no flexibility on arms smuggling,” he said. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14434420 No longer correct link to article but correct site

Italy Won't Send Troops If Israel Keeps Shooting http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060822/ts_nm/mideast_lebanon_italy_dc_1

Israel Kills 3 Palestinians Near Gaza Border http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-08-22-israel-gaza_x.htm?csp=34

Israel Helicopters, Tanks Move Into Gaza http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060822/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_gaza_1

Israel Must Be Ready For Any Iranian Attack, Minister http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060822/ts_nm/mideast_israel_iran_dc_1

Peacekeeping Force Won't Help, May Hurt Israel; Says Analyst...(Yeah, rite) http://www.crosswalk.com/news/1417380.html

Saudi Urges US To Restrain Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060821/pl_afp/mideastconflictsaudi_06082

Israel Launches Gaza Incursions http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5273882.stm

Israel Suspends Review Of Lebanon War http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2341236&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Israel Puts Demand On Peacekeepers http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-08-20-israel-peacekeepers_x.ht

Israel Warns Fatah Could Vanish From Gaza http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060820/wl_mideast_afp/mideastpalestinian

Lebanon Vows Swift Response To Violations http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/20/news/mideast.php

Israel To Prevent Full Lebanon Border Deployment http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060820/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictisr

Israel Defiant On Lebanon Raid http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060820/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictisr

Israel Defiant On Raid, "Prepares For Next Round of War" http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060820/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictisrael_060820122204
Israel Arrests Senior Hamas Lawmaker Sunday, August 20, 2006 (AP) RAMALLAH, West Bank - Israeli troops detained a senior Hamas legislator on Sunday, pushing forward with a crackdown on the Islamic militant group, Palestinian officials and relatives of the man said. Troops surrounded the home of Mahmoud al-Ramahi, secretary-general of the parliament, in broad daylight and detained him, said his sister, Yaqeen. Al-Ramahi had evaded arrest since Israel began its crackdown on Hamas officials following the June 25 abduction of an Israeli soldier by Hamas-linked militants in the Gaza Strip. Israel is now holding five Cabinet ministers and more than two dozen lawmakers. The Israeli army had no immediate comment.

Israel committed to Block Arms & Kill Nasrallah! http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/20/world/middleeast/20mideast.html

Israel Raid In Lebanon Tests Truce http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060819/ts_nm/mideast_dc_258

Israel Seizes Deputy Palestinian PM http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060819/wl_nm/mideast_arrest_dc_9

Israel Confirms Forces In Lebanon http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060819/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_lebanon_6

Israel Wants Hastened Shipment Of Bombs http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060811/us_nm/mideast_israel_rockets_dc_2

Israel Asks US To Ship Cluster Bombs http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/11/news/cluster.php

Israel Orders Military To Expand Lebanon Offensive http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a9U8HAshb928

Israel Says French-US Proposals Meets Most Of Its Demands http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060811/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictun_060811095706

Israel Opts To Expand War http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060809/ts_nm/mideast_dc_77

Israel Approves Expanded Offensive http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060809/ts_nm/mideast_offensive_dc_4

Israel Advances In Lebanon http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060809/ts_nm/mideast_dc_71

Israel Expected To Widen Ground War http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/09/world/main1878042.shtml

This is a video on how the Israelis are barely coping in Northern Israel near Haifa, and the other towns near the Lebanon border where they have gone into underground bunkers for shelters. http://www.globalvisionsisrael.com/Other/HY/Tzafone%2030sec.mpg

Activists Trickle To Lebanon To Protest Israel War! Liberals are going from US to Lebanon!! http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060808/wl_nm/mideast_lebanon_activists_dc

U.N. Rights Council To Discuss Israel...LOL http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/un_israel_rights_2

Israel Considers Lebanon's Offer To Deploy Troops http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/08/08/africa/ME_GEN_Israel_Olmert.

Israel May Drive Deeper Into Lebanon As UN Debates Cease-Fire http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=aAj8_MiVWXSk

Israel Surprised By Militants Arsenal and Attacks http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/07/news/tactics.php

Israel Threatens To Expand Lebanon Ground Offensive http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060807/ts_nm/mideast_peretz_dc_1

Israel To Expand Offensive If No Truce Soon http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060807/wl_nm/mideast_israel_dc_3

Unreported facts conscerning the current situation:

1. ISRAEL BECAME A STATE IN 1312 B.C., TWO MILLENNIA BEFORE ISLAM;

2. ARAB REFUGEES FROM ISRAEL BEGAN CALLING THEMSELVES "PALESTINIANS" IN 1967, TWO DECADES AFTER (MODERN) ISRAELI STATEHOOD;

3. AFTER CONQUERING THE LAND IN 1272 B.C., JEWS RULED IT FOR A THOUSAND YEARS AND MAINTAINED A CONTINUOUS PRESENCE THERE FOR 3,300 YEARS;

4. FOR OVER 3,300 YEARS, JERUSALEM WAS THE JEWISH CAPITAL. IT WAS NEVER THE CAPITAL OF ANY ARAB OR MUSLIM ENTITY. EVEN UNDER JORDANIAN RULE, (EAST) JERUSALEM WAS NOT MADE THE CAPITAL, AND NO ARAB LEADER CAME TO VISIT IT;

5. JERUSALEM IS MENTIONED OVER 700 TIMES IN THE BIBLE, BUT NOT ONCE IS IT MENTIONED IN THE QUR'AN;

6. KING DAVID FOUNDED JERUSALEM; MOHAMMED NEVER SET FOOT IN IT;

7. JEWS PRAY FACING JERUSALEM; MUSLIMS FACE MECCA. IF THEY ARE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES, MUSLIMS PRAY FACING MECCA, WITH THEIR BACKS TO JERUSALEM;

8. IN 1948, ARAB LEADERS URGED THEIR PEOPLE TO LEAVE, PROMISING TO CLEANSE THE LAND OF JEWISH PRESENCE. 68% OF THEM FLED WITHOUT EVER SETTING EYES ON AN ISRAELI SOLDIER;

9. VIRTUALLY THE ENTIRE JEWISH POPULATION OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES HAD TO FLEE AS THE RESULT OF VIOLENCE;

10. SOME 630,000 ARABS LEFT ISRAEL IN 1948, WHILE CLOSE TO A MILLION JEWS WERE FORCED TO LEAVE THE MUSLIM COUNTRIES;

11. IN SPITE OF THE VAST TERRITORIES AT THEIR DISPOSAL, ARAB REFUGESS WERE DELIBERATELY PREVENTED FROM ASSIMILATING INTO THEIR HOST COUNTRIES. OF 100 MILLION REFUGEES FOLLOWING WORLD WAR 2, THEY ARE THE ONLY GROUP TO HAVE NEVER INTEGRATED WITH THEIR CORELIGIONISTS. MOST OF THE JEWISH REFUGEES FROM EUROPE AND ARAB LANDS WERE SETTLED IN ISRAEL, A COUNTRY NO LARGER THAN NEW JERSEY;

12. THERE ARE 22 ARAB COUNTRIES. THERE IS ONLY ONE JEWISH STATE. ARABS STARTED ALL FIVE WARS AGAINST ISRAEL, AND LOST EVERY ONE OF THEM;

13. FATAH AND HAMAS CONSTITUTIONS STILL CALL FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL. ISRAEL CEDED MOST OF THE WEST BANK AND ALL OF GAZA TO THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, AND EVEN PROVIDED IT WITH ARMS;

14. DURING THE JORDANIAN OCCUPATION, JEWISH HOLY SITES WERE VANDALIZED AND WERE OFF LIMITS TO JEWS. UNDER ISRAELI RULE, ALL MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN HOLY SITES ARE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL FAITHS;

15. OUT OF 175 UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS UP TO 1990, 97 WERE AGAINST ISRAEL; OUT OF 690 GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS, 429 WERE AGAINST ISRAEL;

16. THE U.N. WAS SILENT WHEN THE JORDANIANS DESTROYED 58 SYNAGOGUES IN THE OLD CITY OF JERUSALEM. IT REMAINED SILENT WHILE JORDAN SYSTEMATICALLY DESECRATED THE ANCIENT JEWISH CEMETERY ON THE MOUNT OF OLIVES, AN D IT REMAINED SILENT WHEN JORDAN ENFORCED APARTHEID LAWS PREVENTING JEWS FROM ACCESSING THE TEMPLE MOUNT AND WESTERN WALL.

The State Dept. Says Israel Has The Right to Defend Itself: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060730/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_mideast_1

Get this! Iran Forces Prepare To Hit Israel! http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060730/wl_nm/mideast_iran_revenge_dc_1

Two Cargo Planes Have Not Stopped In Scotland For Re-Fueling: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060730/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictusbritainisraelarms_060730144959

Islamic Jihad: Israel "Wipes Out" Militant Head Saturday, July 29, 2006 (AP) NABLUS, West Bank - Israeli troops killed two Islamic Jihad militants on Saturday, including the man the group described as the leader of its militant wing in the West Bank city of Nablus. The group initially said in an announcement over mosque loudspeakers that the slain militant, Hani Awijan, 29, was the leader of its military wing in the West Bank. However, other members of the group later said Awijan headed gunmen in Nablus only. Initial reports said Awijan was shot by Israeli undercover troops trying to arrest him while he played soccer with friends and relatives. The army confirmed soldiers operated in Nablus and said a militant was killed in an exchange of gunfire. Israel Radio said Awijan was responsible for a series of attacks on Israelis. Awijan was responsible for a series of attacks on Israelis. Over the past 17 months, Islamic Jihad has been responsible for all 12 suicide bombing attacks in Israel, killing 71 people. News of the arrest raid spread through Nablus, and large crowds gathered at the hospital. Militants burned tires in the streets and called for a general strike in the city. Shops were quickly closed.

Rice Arrives In Israel: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060729/ts_nm/mideast_dc_615

Hezbollah Fires 90 Rockets Into Israel http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060729/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictisr

More US Arms Deliveries For Israel Expected In Scotland http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060729/pl_afp/mideastconflictus_060729170417

Israel Says It Has 'Green Light' For War On Hezbollah: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060727/ts_afp/mideastconflict_0607271450

The Deadliest Day For Israel: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/26/AR2006

US Denies Breaking UK Rules On Israeli Bomb Flights: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060727/pl_nm/mideast_britain_usa_dc_2

Al Qaeda Vows To Avenge Israel Onslaughts On Lebanon, Gaza: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060727/wl_afp/mideastconflictqaeda_060727162312

Well, there will be no safe place for that scum “sucking bottom feeder” and his group of soon to be dead Shake-in-Bake followers. If his partnering countries don't cease their support, then they'll need all their oil money to rebuild their nation, and bull dozers to fill in their graves. Batman

Rise Arrives In Israel From Lebanon on Monday: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060724/ts_nm/mideast_israel_rice_dc_1 I

srael looks ahead to a buffer zone: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-07-24-lebanon-buffer_x.htm?csp

Hezbollah Envoy: War on Israel to Widen: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060724/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_fighting_hezbollah_1

Gaza groups agree to stop firing at Israel midnight Saturday. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060722/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians%20_1

Israel lets aid in as Lebanese flee north. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060722/ap_on_re_mi_ea/mideast_fighting_le

US rushes precision guided bombs to Israel! I told you! http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060722/ts_nm/mideast_bush_weapons_dc_3

Gaza groups agree to stop firing at Israel midnight Saturday. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060722/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_palestinians_1

Israel calls up troops after Lebanese invasion warning. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060721/ts_afp/mideastconflict_0607211657

Israel massing troops on Lebanese border http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060721/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel_304

Israel pounds Lebanon amid invasion warnings. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060721/ts_afp/mideastconflict_060721144242

The Israelis vow to fight the Palestinians until there is no more terror left in that little strip. That includes Hamas and Hezbollah. Here's the latest word on that from just a few minutes ago. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060717/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictgaz

The Saudis are blaming the Hamas and Hezbollah for the problems that ticked off Israel! get that one. Usually, they're against Israel no matter how you look at it, but not this time. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060717/wl_nm/mideast_saudi_cabinet_dc_1

Olmert Sets Conditions for End to Fighting Monday, July 17, 2006 (AP) JERUSALEM - Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Monday the fighting in Lebanon would end when the two Israeli soldiers captured by Hezbollah guerrillas were freed, rocket attacks on Israel were stopped, and the Lebanese army was deployed along the border. Delivering an impassioned speech to parliament after six days of fighting with Lebanon, Olmert said Israel would have no mercy on militants who attack its cities with rockets, and he pledged to destroy terrorist infrastructure. "We shall seek out every installation, hit every terrorist helping to attack Israeli citizens, destroy all the terrorist infrastructure, in every place. We shall continue this until Hezbollah does the basic and fair things required of it by every civilized person," he said in his first major address since the fighting in Lebanon began last week. "Israel will not agree to live in the shadow of the threat of missiles or rockets against its residents."

Israeli officials have said publicly that Israel would not stop fighting until Hezbollah, a Shiite militia that controls much of south Lebanon, is dismantled. But Olmert's comments Monday - seeking the release of the soldiers, the end of Hezbollah attacks on Israel, and the deployment of Lebanese troops in south Lebanon - seemed to be a softening of that position. In the past six days, 24 Israelis, half of them civilians, were killed in the fighting with Lebanon, while nearly 200 Lebanese, many of them civilians, were killed on the other side.

The fighting began when Hezbollah kidnapped the soldiers in a cross-border raid. Since then, Israel has pounded Lebanon with airstrikes and Hezbollah has fired barrages of rockets and missiles into Israeli towns and cities. "We are not looking for war or direct conflict, but if necessary we will not be frightened by it," Olmert said. He also praised the Israeli people for being strong and united in the face of the rocket bombardment that has sent about a half-million Israelis into bomb shelters. He said a Jewish prayer for the soldiers and said he had pictures of the three captured soldiers in his office and he looked at them often. "We shall do everything with all our might to bring them home," he said, but added that Israel could not make a deal that would lead to further kidnappings. He spoke at length about many of those killed and said that Israel was fighting for them. "When missiles are launched at our residents and our towns, our answer will be war waged at full strength, with all determination, courage and sacrifice," he said. Olmert also accused the Hamas militants in Gaza, where Israel has been waging an offensive for three weeks to free a soldier captured earlier, and Hezbollah in Lebanon of being agents of Iran and Syria.

CNN POLL July 17,2006 Do you think the Israeli military response inside Lebanon is justified? Yes 57% 205905 votes No 43% 152581 votes --------------------------------------- Total: 358486 votes

Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:43 am

Alright, lets look at the current casualty figures from the conflict area: Israel 12 civilians killed 500 civilians injured 12 soldiers killed 6 soldiers wounded 2 soldiers abducted 1 warship damaged 1 tank destroyed Lebanese 145 Lebanese killed 323 Lebanese injured 11 soldiers killed (Lebanese government accounts) Undisclosed number of Hezbollah terrorists killed, but the best estimate from Lebanese sources puts the number at 4.

"Youth is the first victim of war; the first fruit of peace. It takes 20 years or more of peace to make a man; it takes only 20 seconds of war to destroy him."

* * _Baudouin I "No one would be foolish enough to choose war over peace - in peace sons bury their fathers, but in war fathers bury their sons."

* * _Croesus of Lydia "Some of you young men think that war is all glamour and glory, but let me tell you, boys, it is all hell!"

* * _General William T. Sherman "Only the dead have seen the end of war."

* * _Plato All but one of these men were military leaders, and in thier most famous statements, they never glorified war or death.

This came out at 12:42 AM, July 16, 2006 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060715/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel_83 I

srael will not simply lay down their arms since Iran just got involved into this...If Israel has anything to do with it, they'll take out anything they can in Iran, including the nuke plants and processors. Update!! Fresh of the Internet Presses!! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060716/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel_97;_

This with N.Korea to boot also? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060716/ap_on_re_as/nkorea_missiles;_ylt=AlyjtH8KCdMROd_k9.AzGu8UewgF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b3JuZGZhBHNlYwM3MjE-

July 16, 2006

JERUSALEM - A missile fired by Hezbollah, not an unmanned drone laden with explosives, damaged an Israeli warship off Lebanon, the army said Saturday.

Iranian troops helped fire the missile, a senior intelligence official said. One sailor was killed and three were missing. The intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the information, said about 100 Iranian soldiers are in Lebanon and helped fire the Iranian-made, radar-guided C-102 at the ship late Friday. The attack alarmed Israel because initial information indicated the guerrillas had used a drone for the first time to attack Israeli forces. But the army's investigation showed that Hezbollah had fired an Iranian-made missile at the vessel from the shores of Lebanon, said Brig. Gen. Ido Nehushtan. "We can confirm that it was hit by an Iranian-made missile launched by Hezbollah. We see this as very profound fingerprint of Iranian involvement in Hezbollah," Nehushtan said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Another great story of Israel doing some great damage..to Lebanon and the Gaza Strip... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060713/ap_on_re_mi_ea/lebanon_israel_13

Pres. Bush stated in Germany that Israel had the right to defend itself, after Hezbollah and Hamas kidnapped Israeli soldiers. The first soldier Hamas dug under the border and killed two and kidnapped another. Cpl. Gilat Shalit. Here's what Bush said: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060713/pl_afp/mideastunrestus_060713172445

The birth of Israel

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/78601.stm

Israeli planes strike southern suburb of Beirut

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13823680

Israeli aircraft attack Palestinian foreign ministry 11.20am Thursday July 13, 2006 GAZA - Israeli aircraft attacked the Palestinian Foreign Ministry in Gaza City today, causing a fire in the building, witnesses said. There were no immediate reports of casualties in the air strike, part of an offensive Israel launched in the Gaza Strip two weeks ago after militants operating from the territory abducted a soldier in a raid into the Jewish state. An Israeli military spokeswoman had no comment on the attack, which was carried out at night when the Foreign Ministry was likely to have been empty. Israel killed at least 23 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip today, including nine members of one family in an air strike that destroyed a house where the army said senior Hamas commanders were meeting. The death toll, which Palestinian medics said included 14 civilians, was the highest in a single day since Israel launched its offensive on June 28 to force militants to free the soldier and halt cross-border rocket fire. Israel also went on the offensive on its border with Lebanon, where Hizbollah guerrillas captured two soldiers and killed eight other troops. - REUTERS

Israel Vows To Push Gaza Offensivehttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/09/world/main1786846.shtml

Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:12 pm

Israeli Planes Attack Two Gaza Bridges By STEVEN GUTKIN Associated Press Writer Israel Won't Bargain for Captive Soldier GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) -- Israeli troops entered southern Gaza and planes attacked two bridges and a power station, knocking out electricity in most of the coastal strip early Wednesday and stepping up the pressure on Palestinian militants holding captive a 19-year-old Israeli soldier. Israeli troops began taking up positions in two locations east of the Gaza town of Rafah under the cover of tank shells, according to witnesses and Palestinian security officials.

Palestinians dug in behind mounds of dirt, bracing for a major Israeli offensive. The Israeli strikes came amid intensive diplomatic efforts in the Arab world and by the United Nations. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Israel to "give diplomacy a chance." Trying to defuse building tensions, negotiators from the ruling Hamas movement said Tuesday they had accepted a document implicitly recognizing Israel. But two Syrian-based Hamas leaders denied a final deal had been reached. Israel said only freedom for the captive soldier, Cpl. Gilad Shalit, could defuse the crisis, not a political agreement.

The Israeli military said in a statement that the object of the attacks on the bridges late Tuesday and early Wednesday was "to impair the ability of the terrorists to transfer the kidnapped soldier." Knocking down the bridges would cut Gaza in two, Palestinian security officials said. Early Wednesday, Israeli planes fired at least nine missiles at Gaza's only power station, cutting electricity to much of the Gaza Strip, Palestinian security officials said. The station's three funtioning turbines and a gasoline reservoir were engulfed in enormous flames that firefighters were unable to control.

The attack raised the specter of a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, as water pumps in the strip are powered by electricity. Israeli military officials said Prime Minister Ehud Olmert approved a "limited operation" for southern Gaza, aimed at "terrorist infrastructure." The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters. Palestinian security forces said Israeli tanks were on the move near the Israeli village of Nahal Oz, a main Israeli staging area just outside Gaza, but that they had not yet entered the territory. An Associated Press reporter saw tanks moving on the Israeli side of the border fence. Some Israeli troops crossed the border into southern Gaza, near the site of Sunday's militant attack in which Shalit was abducted.

It was not immediately clear how many soldiers entered Gaza, though the army confirmed its soldiers were crossing the border. A number of Israeli soldiers had been in Gaza since Sunday's assault. In the Shajaiyeh neighborhood of Gaza City, not far from the fence, armed militants took up positions across from the blaring headlights of Israeli vehicles, and Israeli attack helicopters hovered overhead. The roar of Israeli fighter planes reverberated throughout Gaza City. The militants told residents to leave the area. They piled gasoline-soaked tires in the streets. Earlier, bulldozers blocked some of the main roads with piles of sand and dirt to try to slow down Israeli tanks.

There were no reports of casualties in the Israeli strikes. Palestinian TV showed pictures of the first bridge hit, with fallen concrete blocks, twisted metal and protruding water pipes. Children walked in the wreckage. Shalit's abduction Sunday by Hamas' military wing and two other Hamas-linked groups has threatened to turn already devastated relations between Israel and the Hamas-led government into an all-out war. Hamas took over the Palestinian Authority after winning parliamentary elections in January, and has been under international pressure to renounce violence and recognize Israel.

White House press secretary Tony Snow said he had only seen media accounts of the Hamas-Fatah accord, but reiterated that Hamas had to meet three conditions before a crippling aid boycott could be lifted. "Once again, we can all recite from memory now: recognize Israel's right to exist, renounce terror, and abide by all past agreements. Those are the preconditions," Snow said in Washington.

Complicating matters was a new claim by the Hamas-linked Popular Resistance Committees, one of the three groups that carried out Sunday's assault, that it had also kidnapped a Jewish settler in the West Bank. Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said the report was being taken "very seriously," and military officials said there was "rising fears" the claim was true. The fate of the abducted soldier has riveted Israelis, with Shalit's face plastered on newspapers and callers to talk shows praying for his safety. In an interview Tuesday with The Associated Press, Noam Shalit begged the captors of his wounded son's to provide medical care and asked "to hear his voice and to see his face." Olmert rejected the kidnappers' demands to free Palestinian prisoners and instead approved plans for a military push into Gaza.

About 3,000 soldiers, along with tanks and armored vehicles, massed along Israel's border with the territory, and commanders said they were awaiting orders to move in. Hamas' Web site said there were "back channel" negotiations with Israel over a prisoner release. Israeli military officials said a negotiating team has been activated, but declined to release further information. The kidnappers did not say where Shalit was being held or release any photos of him. Israeli officials said they believed the soldier suffered light wounds to his stomach and was being held in southern Gaza.

On Tuesday, for the first time since Sunday's assault, in which two Israeli soldiers and two militants were killed, militants acknowledged they were holding Shalit and said he was alive. "The soldier is in a secure place that the Zionists cannot reach," said Mohammed Abdel Al, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees. He said his group also took a West Bank settler hostage. Mohammad Nazal, a Damascus-based member of the Hamas politburo, said the militant group would not agree to free the Israeli soldier "without a deal." "No release without something in return," he told AP.

"This is the popular demand and we cannot let down our people." Israel's Channel 2 TV reported that international mediators involved in talks with the kidnappers had given up, saying negotiations were going nowhere. An Egyptian official concurred that talks with Hamas officials in Gaza were "on hold," but insisted negotiations were still taking place with Hamas leaders in Syria. Egyptian officials said their government asked Hamas to release the soldier and deployed 2,500 extra soldiers along the border with Gaza to prevent an influx of Palestinians if Israel invaded. Egypt also imposed a nighttime curfew on residents along the border. Egypt's intelligence chief, Omar Suleiman, urged Hamas' Syria-based leader, Khaled Mashaal, to push for Shalit's release, the officials said on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation.

The crisis touched off by the soldier's capture has caused widespread alarm among Arab countries worried about a flare-up in Israeli-Palestinian tensions. Arab countries, worried about Hamas' ascendancy and especially the actions of its more militant wings, appeared to be trying to support Abbas as he worked to isolate the more militant arm of Hamas and forge ties with the political wing of Hamas. Abbas has been in touch with Arab leaders, including Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, King Abdullah II of Jordan and Saudi King Abdullah to discuss the latest crisis, said his aide, Nabil Abu Rdeneh. --- Associated Press writer Salah Nasrawi in Cairo contributed to this report

Iran Nuclear Reactor Future and the World Divided On Whether Iran Has the Right to Uranium Enrichment

Articles relating to Iran Nuclear Reactor Future and the World Divided On Whether Iran Has the Right to Uranium Enrichment in Chronological order, beginning September 14, 2006 from March 5, 2003 as compiled and updated daily by MAIL CALL members and other articles from various sources posted here at FOX 6 Forum by Batman for anyone who cares to stay alerted to the future changing daily:

Iran This, Iran That, Iran-STFU! http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?p=136329

PLS PASS ON-Message from Iraq

The proud warriors of Baker Company wanted to do something to pay tribute To our fallen comrades. So since we are part of the only Marine Infantry Battalion left in Iraq the one way that we could think of doing that is By taking a picture of Baker Company saying the way we feel. Semper Fi http://community.fox6.com/forums/thread/802823.aspx

Historical Excellence; Honoring Patriots who made the Ultimate Sacrifice for Freedom http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?p=136205

ALL POINT OF VIEWS HOWEVER ON THIS PAGE ARE BATMANS AND OTHER POINT OF VIEWS ARE WELCOME

September 24, 2006 “Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” is presented as an historical summary and is more relevant then you can imagine in light of current events. http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=905345#905345

VMFA-323 Death Rattlers and VMFA-531 Grey Ghosts 79/80 CV-43 cruise http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=10068

THE PRECEEDING POST ARE NOT SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION IN AN OPEN PUBLIC FORUM:

The shah's air force had more than 450 modern combat aircraft, including top-of-the-line F-14 Tomcat fighters and about 5,000 well-trained pilots. By 1979 the air force, numbering close to 100,000 personnel, was by far the most advanced of the three services and among the most impressive air forces in the developing world. Reliable information on the air force after the Revolution was difficult to obtain, but it seems that by 1987 a fairly large number of aircraft had been cannibalized for spare parts. A total of 14 air bases are currently operational: Ahvaz, Bandar Abbas, Bushehr, Chan Bahar, Dezful, Doshan Tapeh (Tehran), Ghaleh Morghi (Tehran), Hamadan, Isfahan, Mashhad, Mehrabad (Tehran), Shiraz, Tabriz and Zahedan. Soviet-made aircraft are distributed throughout the country to fufill mission roles of ground attack, transport, training and interception. Bandar Abbas, Bushehr, Dezful, Hamadan, Tabriz and Mehrabad are the centers for ground attack squadrons. Shiraz is the home of the interceptor squadron. It also provides training along with, Mehrabad, Doshan Tapeh and Isfahan. Shiraz also houses the transport squadron. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/airforce.htm

Air Force Equipment http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/airforce-equipment.h tm

IIAF Imperial Iranian Air Force IIAF, Imperial Iranian Air Force, Iran, Iranian Aircraft, History of Iran, Iranian Aviation, This is ... History of the Imperial Iranian Air Force, IIAF, Golden Crown, Iran, Iranian Aircraft, History http://www.iiaf.net

Iran's Air Force Forum http://www.irandefence.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7 or the Forum Index: http://www.irandefence.net/forumdisplay.php?f=7

Iran Defence Forum http://www.irandefence.net/index.php

IRAN's National Security Forum http://www.irandefence.net/forumdisplay.php?f=3

Taking on Iran's air force - Defense Tech: Taking on Iran's air force

The stand-off with Iran over its nuclear ambitions was just beginning while I was embedded with Marine All-Weather Fighter Attack Squadron 332 at Al Asad air base in Iraq. More than once the fliers lamented that they'd probably be back in the States by the time the "inevitable" bombing of Iran got underway.

Me: Oh God. We can't afford a war with Iran Aviator

#1: Whatever. We'd kick their asses. Aviator

#2: No, they've got F-14s! Aviator

#3: Yeah, my wife [deployed to northern Iraq] saw one! Aviator

#1: We'd still kick their asses. Me: Oh God.

September 24, 2006

“Operation Evening Light” and “Operation Eagle Claw” is presented as an historical summary and is more relevant then you can imagine in light of current events. http://community.fox6.com/forums/ShowThread.aspx?PostID=905345#905345

If, God help us, the stand-off does turn violent, U.S. air power will play a critical role. For months pundits have predicted a massive bombing campaign to target Iran's nuclear facilities, and perhaps even to attempt regime change. But don't expect Iran's air force to roll over like Iraq's did in 1991 and again in 2003.

Unlike the Iraqi air force, the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF) appears to be well-armed, well-trained and eager for a fight. Besides the aforementioned F-14 Tomcats, 79 of which the U.S. sold to the country before the Shah was deposed, the air force operates several dozen of each of the following types:

J-7 (Chinese-built MiG-21 derivative)
MiG-29
Su-24
F-5E
F-4E Phantom
Mirage F1 All told, the IRIAF flies as many as 300 fighters.

All are older designs, but have been maintained and, in many cases, upgraded by the indigenous aerospace industry, which has become proficient in reverse-engineering weapons and spare parts -- and perhaps even engines. And the IRIAF has aerial tankers too -- a force multiplier only the most advanced air forces maintain. Veteran aviation correspondent Tom Cooper and his co-writer Liam Devlin wrote a fascinating feature for a recent issue of Combat Aircraft Magazine, profiling the IRIAF.

The authors interviewed IRIAF defectors and U.S. Navy aircrew that have tangled with Iranian fliers over the Arabian Gulf. The feature cautions against the Western habit of underestimating the IRIAF: In November 2003, a USAF E-3 Sentry flying a patrol over Iraq tracked a formation of no less than 16 IRIAF F-14As ... This was the largest group of Iranian F-14s detected in flight by the U.S. military since 1997, when nine IRIAF Tomcats were tracked over the southern Persian Gulf by the U.S. Navy. ... During the summer of 2005, several Su-24s were observed operating over the Persian Gulf, armed with Chinese-made C802K-2 anti-ship missiles. ... Iranian Phantoms were sighted as well, usually carrying AIM-7 Sparrow and AIM-9 Sidewinder [air-to-air missiles]. Now that the 1st Fighter Wing has its first F-22 squadron combat-ready, and with the Navy's Super Hornets equipped with electronically-scanned radars, we have the capability to beat the IRIAF. But it wouldn't necessarily be an easy fight.

Throw in Iran's SA-15 surface-to-air missiles and you've got a tough air-defense nut to crack. And remember ... an air campaign might be just a prelude to a ground invasion. Last year I stood on the Iraq-Iran border and listened to Iranian armored divisions throw down practice artillery barrages. The Tennessee National Guardsmen I was with (the 278th cavalry regiment equipped with M-1 Abrams tanks) admitted that they couldn't punch through that border if they wanted to. We must find a diplomatic solution to the problem of Iran's nuclear ambitions. --

David Axe - http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002554.html

Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force The Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF) (Persian: نیروی هوایی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران‎ ​) is the aviation branch of the of the Iranian armed forces. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Air_Force

Firebrand strategist to head Iran’s Air Force Tehran, Iran, Jan. 21 –

A senior commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards who once vowed that “no part of the Islamic world is going to be safe and secure for America” was named as the new head of the Guards’ Air Force.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a decree on Saturday, appointing Brigadier General Hossein Salami as the new commander of the Air Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Another senior Guards commander, Brigadier General Mohammad-Reza Zahedi, was put in charge of the IRGC Ground Forces. Salami is known as the father of the IRGC’s “asymmetric warfare” doctrine, which he helped to develop in the months preceding the war in Iraq. At the time, Salami was Director of Operations in the IRGC command headquarters.

The military doctrine is based on two components as strategic tools in any military confrontation: the massive use of suicide operations to target U.S. and Western interests around the world, and the use of weapons of mass destruction.

On July 4, 2004, General Salami called for the destruction of the United States during a ceremony to recruit suicide bombers that were willing to attack Western and Israeli targets. Continued http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5413

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Iran deploys locally-manufactured warplane Hopefully soon to be scrap metal courtesy of our Raptors .. Associated Press Tehran, September 6, 2006 Iran deployed its first locally-manufactured fighter bomber plane on Wednesday during large-scale military exercises, state-run television reported. "The bomber Saegheh or Lightning is similar to (the American) F-18 but more powerful. It was designed, optimised and improved by Iranian experts," the report said. The report said the Iranian air force had commissioned Saegheh after many test flights in the past year.Television footage showed the takeoff and flight of the airplane. The plane had a small cockpit and only one pilot. It launched two rockets. "Saegheh is capable of launching both rockets and bombs," the report said.

General Karim Ghavami, commander of Iran's Air Force, told state-run television that the war games were being held "to show the trans-regional forces that we are ready to defend our country up to the latest drop of our blood." The Islamic republic, which views the United States as a foe, is concerned about the US military presence in neighbouring Iraq and Afghanistan.

It also has expressed worry about Israeli threats to destroy its nuclear facilities, which the West contends could be used to make a bomb but which Iran insists are for civilian uses only. During manoeuvres dubbed "The Blow of Zolfaghar," which began in August 19, Iran test fired short range surface-to-surface, sub-to-surface missiles, new air defence system and laser bombs.

Iran's military test-fired a series of missiles during large-scale war games in the Persian Gulf in March and April, including a missile it claimed was not detectable by radar that can use multiple warheads to hit several targets simultaneously. After decades of relying on foreign weapons purchases, Iran now says it is increasingly self-sufficient in its military equipment claiming it annually exports more than $100 million (euro81 million) worth of military equipment to more than 50 countries.

Since 1992, Iran has produced its own tanks, armored personnel carriers, missiles and the Saegheh fighter plane. The government has not said how many warplanes it will build. It announced in early 2005 that it had begun production of torpedoes.

Lt. Fishman http://airforcepundit.blogspot.com/2006/09/iran-deploys-locally-manufa ctured.html If only I had the Internet in 1979/80 as a Yoeman aboard USS Coral Sea (CV-43), owe what I could have Done!!!!!!!!!!

KNOW YOUR ENEMY

CIA Fact Book on Iran https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ir.html

IRIAF - a new Air Force? IRIAF - a new Air Force?With the change of the regime in Iran, in February-April 1979, and worsening of relations to the USA, it was expected that Iran would not be able to operate its Tomcats any more. Such expcetations were reinforced by rumors about the US personnel sabotaging aircraft before it was forced to leave the country. By September 1980, however, the Iranian Air Force - re-named into "Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force" (IRIAF) - managed to make an increasing number of airframes operational, despite immense problems due to repeated purges of its officers, some of which were executed, others imprisoned, forced into exile or early retirement.

The IRIAF survived these times and its Tomcats were to become involved in the bloody war against Iraq even before this officially began, scoring their first kill already on 9 September 1980. This "IRIAF", namely, was still the "old" IIAF by everything but the name: a majority of its well-trained officers, pilots, and technical personnel, all of which were patriots beyond any doubt, remained with the service and were to give much more than anybody could describe as a "call of duty" in the following war. site is under construct ali asariha so please waite ordered a total of 80 Grumman F-14A Tomcats in two batches, one of 30 and another of 50 aircraft, in early 1974.

The first F-14 was delivered to the Imperial Iranian Air Force (IIAF) in January 1976, and the first two units were fully operational by the summer of 1977, by when the training of additional crews was advancing at a very high pace. By late 1978, the 80th F-14 produced to Iran was built as well; instead of being delivered, however, the aircraft was kept in the USA to be used as test-rig for installation of the USAF-style "boom-and-receptacle" in-flight refuelling system.

Meanwhile, over 120 Iranian pilots and 80 RIOs were qualified for the Tomcat, and an additional group was about to finish their training. Since 1977 the IIAF F-14s were engaged in a series of tests, which put the plane and its weapons system to the extremes, and eventually ended by several spectacular test-firings of AIM-54s, two of which might have scored unofficial world-records for the range, speed, and the height reached by the missiles in flight. In October 1978 also two IIAF F-14As intercepted a high and fast-flying Soviet MiG-25 over the Casspian sea, forcing it to abort a recce run over Iran, and in turn ending similar Soviet operations over the country. group

The first and only country to receive F-14 Tomcat was, The Nirouyeh Havaiyeh Shahanshahiye Iran, or Imperial Iranian Air Force. Soviet MiG-25 Foxbat had regularly been flying unrestricted over Iranian territory, and IIAF had no mean of intercepting these high-speed intruders. Thus, the search for a new fighter/interceptor begun. Iranian pilots were virtually flown and tested every fighter available at the time including MiG's (some done secretly in other countries). The final report which indicated pro's and con's of each fighter suggested the F-14 Tomcat and F-15 Eagle as the best fighters. In August of 1973, the IIAF selected the F-14 Tomcat ( From 1970 Iraq was in contact with French government to equip their Air Force with Mirage F-1, this was another factor for IIAF to choose F-14 and start planning for purchase, operation and training for F-14). The initial order signed in January of 1974 covered 30 Tomcats, but in June 50 more were added to the contract.At the same time, the Iranian government-owned Bank-e-Melli stepped in, and agreed to loan Grumman $75 million to partially make up for a US government loan of $200 million to Grumman, which had just been cancelled. This loan save the F-14 program and enabled Grumman to secure a further loan of $125 million from a consortium of American banks, ensuring at least for the moment that the F-14 program would continue. Thanks to Bank-e-Melli.

The Iranian Tomcats were virtually identical to the US Navy version, with only a few classified avionics items being omitted. The base site for Iranian Tomcat operations was at Isfahan’s (Khatami Air Force Base) and 1 Squadron at Shiraz Tactical Fighter Base. Imperial Iranian Air Force aircrews began to arrive in the USA for training in May of 1974,The crew were mainly veteran F-4 pilots.The first 4 pilots who came to "Miramar Naval Base" in California for F-14 training were:General Abdolhosain Minousepehr (Commander of Khatami AFB).Major Mojtaba ZangenehMajor Mohammad FarahawarCapt. Kazem HeidarzadehShortly after, the second group went to "Oceana Naval Base" in Virginia. They were:Capt. Jamshid Afshar.Capt. Hosein Taghdis.Capt. Hassan Afghantoloee.Capt. Jalil Moslemi.Capt. Abolfazl Hooshyar.Capt. Reza Attaee. Capt. Bahram Ghaneii.Capt. Mohammad Pyrasteh.Capt. Abbas Amiraslani.Capt. Shahram Roostami.Capt. Javad Shookraii.After completion of F-14 training in USA they became F-14 Instructor pilots. After returning to Isfahan they started training the rest of the pilots with the cooperation of 4 American F-14 Instructors which was part of contract.Major Farahawar flew one of the F-14 from USA to Iran.Major Zangeneh was the Iranian pilot who tested the "Phoenix" missile in USA.(The Islamic regime purged all of them from Air Force, except "Rostami" and "Attaee" .)

The Iranian Tomcats were fairly late on the production line, and were therefore delivered with the TF30-P-414 engine, which was much safer than the compressor-stall-prone P-412 engine. The first 2 of 79 Tomcats arrived in Iran in January of 1976. By May of 1977, when Iran celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Royal House, 12 had been delivered. At this time, the Soviet MiG-25 Foxbats were still making a nuisance of themselves by flying over Iran, and the Shah ordered live firing tests of the Phoenix to be carried out as a warning. In August of 1977, IIAF crews shot down a BQM-34E drone flying at 50,000 feet, and the Soviets took the hint and Foxbat over flights promptly ended.

The IIAF Tomcats bore the US Navy serial numbers of 160299/160378, and were assigned the IIAF serial numbers 3-863 to 3-892 and 3-6001 to 3-6050. The last of 79 Tomcats were delivered to Iran in 1978. The last Iranian Tomcat (BuNo 170378) was retained in the USA for use as a test bed. Iran also ordered 714 AIM-54A Phoenix missiles, but only 284 had been delivered at the time. Toward the end of the 1970s most suppliers were cancelled by the new government, including an order for 400 AIM-54A Phoenix missiles.

Imposition of a strict arms embargo against Iran by the West caused a severe spare parts and maintenance problem, with many pilots and maintenance personnel following the Shah into exile. As a result, by 1980 the Iranian Air Force was only a shadow of its former self. This embargo was to have an especially severe long-term effect on the Tomcat fleet, since the embargo prevented the delivery of any spares.

The Iran-Iraq war began on September 22, 1980 with an Iraqi air attack on six Iranian air bases and four Iranian army bases. It was followed by an Iraqi land attack at four points along a 700-kilometer front. Air power did not play a dominant role in the Iran-Iraq war. During the first phase of the war, Iranian aircraft had the fuel and the endurance to win most of these aerial encounters, either by killing Iraqi aircraft with their first shot of an AIM-9 sidewinder or else by forcing Iraqi fighters to withdraw. Iranian pilots had the edge in training and experience, but as the war dragged on, this edge was gradually lost because of the repeated purges within the ranks of the Iranian officers which removed experienced officers and pilots who were suspected of disloyalty to the Islamic regime. The Iranians could not generate more than 30-60 sorties per day, whereas the number of sorties that Iraq could mount steadily increased year after year, reaching a peak as high as 600 in 1986-88.

It is extremely difficult to get any reliable estimates of just how many Iranian F-14As were in service at any one time during the war, with planes having been deliberately cannibalized to keep some flying. In the summer of 1984, it is estimated that Iran could fly only 15-20 Tomcats, maintaining them largely by cannibalization. Very often, Tomcat served in a mini-AWACS role by virtue of their powerful radars and was deliberately not risked in combat.

The Iraqi high command had order all it's pilots not to engage with F-14 and do not get close if F-14 is known to be operating in the area. Usually the presence of Tomcats was enough to scare the enemy and send the Iraqi fighters back.

The Iranian F-14s scored most of their kills with AIM-54A Phoenix missiles during the war with Iraq losing only one Tomcat in combat when it got cut off-guard by a MiG-21 (Pilot "Ale Agha" and Rio...??. Lost their life).

Another Tomcat was lost due to loss of control when the aircraft entered in spin (Both pilot and RIO Ejected).And a Ground to air missile hit another Tomcat over "Khark" island (Pilot was Capt. Hazin).

It is documented that Iranian F-14As have shot down Iraqi fighters, including Mirage F1s, SU-22, MiG-21, MiG-23, and MiG-25. An Iranian Tomcat scored a kill against an Iraqi Mirage F1 as late as the spring of 1988.

Iranian capabilities in this area may have taken place on February 11, 1985, when 25 Iranian F-14A Tomcats took a mass fly by over Tehran. In spite of the Western arms embargo, Iran been able to maintain a more-or-less steady supply of spare parts for its fleet of Tomcats, from Iranian aircraft industries based at 1st tactical air base in Tehran. The number of Tomcats in service with Iran is reported as many as 60 aircrafts.

Some of these parts also seem to have been smuggled into Iran by Israel. Also there is rumor of Russians provided assistance to upgrade tomcats aging airframe. US government supplied arms to Iran in exchange for its assistance in getting hostages held in Lebanon released.

However, the AN/AWG-9 radar is certainly operational, and the Iranian Tomcats can fire AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-7 Sparrow missiles. Most Iranian Tomcats flew with a missile load of four Sparrows and two Sidewinders.

Rumors had been going about that Iranian F-14As had been fitted with the Russian made engine and ejection seat and has the capability to launch air-to-surface anti-ship missiles.

PERFORMANCE of Grumman F-14A Tomcat

Wing span: 19,45 m. (wings forward)
Wing span: 11,65 m. (wings swept)
Length: 19,10 m.
Height: 4,88 m.
Max. speed: Mach 2.34 (2517 km/h, 1564 mph.)
Empty weight: 39,310 lbs.(17830 kg.)
Max. weight: 74,348 lbs.(33724 kg.)
Power plant: two Pratt & Whitney TF30-P-414 afterburning turbofans
Thrust: 14,000 lbs.(6350 kg.) each
With Afterburner: 20,900 lbs.(9480 kg.)

Each Iranian Tomcats Serials 160299 F-14A 3-863 160300 F-14A 3-864 160301 F-14A 3-865 160302 F-14A 3-866 160303 F-14A 3-867 160304 F-14A 3-868 160305 F-14A 3-869 160306 F-14A 3-870 160307 F-14A 3-871 160308 F-14A 3-872 160309 F-14A 3-873 160310 F-14A 3-874 160311 F-14A 3-875 160312 F-14A 3-876 160313 F-14A 3-877 160314 F-14A 3-878 160315 F-14A 3-879 160316 F-14A 3-880 160317 F-14A 3-881 160318 F-14A 3-882 160319 F-14A 3-883 160320 F-14A 3-884 160321 F-14A 3-885 160322 F-14A 3-886 160323 F-14A 3-887 160324 F-14A 3-888 160325 F-14A 3-889 160326 F-14A 3-890 160327 F-14A 3-891 160328 F-14A 3-892 160329 F-14A 3-8001 160330 F-14A 3-8002 160331 F-14A 3-8003 160332 F-14A 3-8004 160333 F-14A 3-8005 160334 F-14A 3-8006 160335 F-14A 3-8007 160336 F-14A 3-8008160337 F-14A 3-8009 160338 F-14A 3-8010 160339 F-14A 3-8011 160340 F-14A 3-8012 160341 F-14A 3-8013 160342 F-14A 3-8014 160343 F-14A 3-8015160344 F-14A 3-8016 160345 F-14A 3-8017 160346 F-14A 3-8018 160347 F-14A 3-8019 160348 F-14A 3-8020 160349 F-14A 3-8021 160350 F-14A 3-8022 160351 F-14A 3-8023 160352 F-14A 3-8024 160353 F-14A 3-8025 160354 F-14A 3-8026 160355 F-14A 3-8027 160356 F-14A 3-8028 160357 F-14A 3-8029 160358 F-14A 3-8030 160359 F-14A 3-8031 160360 F-14A 3-8032 160361 F-14A 3-8033 160362 F-14A 3-8034 160363 F-14A 3-8035 160364 F-14A 3-8036 160365 F-14A 3-8037160366 F-14A 3-8038 160367 F-14A 3-8039 160368 F-14A 3-8040 160369 F-14A 3-8041 160370 F-14A 3-8042 160371 F-14A 3-8043 160372 F-14A 3-8044 160373 F-14A 3-8045 160374 F-14A 3-8046 160375 F-14A 3-8047 160376 F-14A 3-8048 160377 F-14A 3-8049 Remained in the U.S.A. for testing proved uncessful.

Aircraft and squardon Photos - There ready for action http://irancat.blogspot.com

September, 23 2006

These days you must review every aspect of the issues affecting our lives and those effecting our nations and nations of the world in order to understand the world we live in. At the highest levels of government, decisions that effect rather complicated polices must consider every consequence for any action.

Today I read as many articles as I could, around thirty I guess and compiled some interesting links together and I feel I can make a few comments without stumbling.

Iranian bloggers are presenting a wide range of view points from supporting Liberty and Freedom to condemning both Israel for their military response to the kidnapping of two soldiers to Iran’s involvement backing Hezbollah.

The Iranian Press and news agencies are not allowed to report world wide reactions or openly discuss the issues of Iran’s Nuclear Energy Policies, a firm fist of censorship by the Iran government.

If every Iranian had a computer and a blog or access to the net, then there would be more informed Iran citizens. Is the resolve of the Iranian people greater then we expected it to be toward Liberty and Freedom? Iranian bloggers have been jailed, beaten and clubbed for speaking out against their government’s policies.

After reading many articles, I can see the necessity to review further, so that I may have a greater sense of the number of Iranian bloggers and if there presenting their message to their own people rather then the world at large.

When you think about it, if nearly two-thirds of the population is under the age of 30 and well educated people within their society as suggested by a recent preponderance of Iranian blogs, there is the possibility that there might not be that many Iranians up set if the Iran government was to be replaced by a more peaceful and moderate government, not with standing cultural and ideological differences between Iran, Israel and the U. S.

As the President of Iran says, if any Western powers armed forces would attack, we will hit back "like lightning" against any attack as it crowed over its military prowess and showed off firepower at a major army parade.

Amazing that he would say this, because in reality that is exactly what his country would get if the western powers attacked and I’m not talking about ground troops as there would be no need for occupation, and infrastructure, bridges, dams, etc. would not need to be targeted, just military targets and nuclear energy plants, unless the might of Iran was destroyed, their present government included, it might be possible to work with moderate and peaceful Iranians and with stain from attacking there Nuclear Plants at the commencement, provided the world can even afford to allow the Iranians to sadvance their determined Nuclear Energy Technologies Programs.

Nothing I’ve read so far makes me feel there will be an up rising by the Iranian people, themselves for the most part impoverished due to Iran’s investments of military assets, yet the possibility that they could rise up exists but without an organized rebellion supported by efforts from the out side, supplying arms and air power, etc. any rebellion would be short lived and crushed by Iran’s present government.

Unfortunately, not all Iranians have computers or M-16’s and unless the present government is replaced, the Iranian people will suffer their plight as a result of their present governments polices and defiance for world order and peace.

Referee to the thread The Iranian Blogger and of particular interest are articles from the blogs in side and outside Iran from Iranians at blogs x Iranians.

A directory of English blogs written by Iranians around the world. For more information on Iranian blogs http://blogsbyiranians.com

Economics edge out Iran as French, German, Russian leaders meet http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060923/ts_afp/francegermanyrussiasummit_

Nuclear talks with Iran may start without U.S. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060923/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_1

Major powers weigh sanctions against Iran's nuclear, missile sectors http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060923/ts_afp/irannuclearunsanctions_060

Iran: Calls for Dialogue with the United States http://www.payvand.com/news/06/sep/1267.html

September 22, 2006

There are Americans who have spent time in Iraq, whom have relatives and friends living in Iraq who want very much to see their family members and friends prevail against insurgents, militants and bullies. Is it a myth that Iraq and Afghanistan are in the middle of a Civil War, and if it is not happening at this moment are they in a position to have one eventually?

Iraq war hurting terror fight, spy agencies say September 23, 2006
Jihadists using conflict as rallying cry, National Intelligence Estimate finds


WASHINGTON - The war in Iraq has become the primary recruitment vehicle for violent Islamic extremists, motivating a new generation of potential terrorists around the world whose numbers are increasing faster than the United States and its allies are eliminating the threat, U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded.

A 30-page National Intelligence Estimate completed in April cites the "centrality" of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and the insurgency that has followed, as the leading inspiration for new Islamic extremist networks and cells that are united by little more than an anti-Western agenda. Rather than contributing to eventual victory in the global counterterrorism struggle, it concludes that the situation in Iraq has worsened the U.S. position, according to officials familiar with the classified document.

"It's a very candid assessment," one intelligence official said yesterday of the estimate, the first formal examination of global terrorist trends written by the National Intelligence Council since the March 2003 invasion. "It's stating the obvious."

At odds with recent Bush speeches

The NIE, whose contents were first reported by the New York Times, coincides with public statements by senior intelligence officials describing a different kind of conflict than the one outlined by President Bush in a series of recent speeches marking the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Together with our coalition partners," Bush said in an address earlier this month to the Military Officers Association of America, "we've removed terrorist sanctuaries, disrupted their finances, killed and captured key operatives, broken up terrorist cells in America and other nations, and stopped new attacks before they're carried out. We're on the offense against the terrorists on every battlefront, and we'll accept nothing less than complete victory."

But the battlefronts intelligence analysts depict are far more impenetrable and difficult, if not impossible, to combat with the standard tools of warfare.

Although intelligence officials agree that the United States has seriously damaged the leadership of al-Qaeda and disrupted its ability to plan and direct major operations, radical Islamic networks have spread and decentralized. Continued http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14975242


Some believe a world war is the only thing that will truly wake people up and become united against the war on terror. We must not for get that while the Middle East is a pretty big mess right now, Iraq has built and opened many Iraqi owned businesses, schools, hospitals a police force a military and they have had free elections. If only the Iranian and Lebanon people would rise up against terror and fascism, expelling members of there government in an effort to secure a lasting peace like Iraq and Afghanistan have done, things would be much different, but the cold hard fact is the Iranian and Lebanon people have not the resolve at present to do so and while the Iraq and Afghanistan people are making every attempt to do so with the help of the U. S. and coalition forces, the cards are stacked in the favor of Iran, especially with the Iraq President sending his Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki to Iran, reaching out to the Iranian President for help with his countries security.

The visit by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki reflected the complex relationship between mostly Shiite Iran and Iraq's government, dominated by Shiite allies of Tehran. Ties have grown stronger between the two, including new oil cooperation.

But at the same time, the United States — the Iraqi government's other top ally — has repeatedly accused Iran of interfering in Iraqi politics and allowing insurgents to cross the porous 1,000-mile border, claims Iran denies. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_iran_6

“President of Iran pledged undying support for Baghdad's new government on Tuesday, telling
Iraq's visiting prime minister and fellow Shi'ite Islamist, Nuri al-Maliki, that Tehran would help him end the violence at home.

Iraqi National Security Adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie told Iraqi state television one of the main agreements concerned tightening security on the lengthy border. U.S. and British officials accuse Iranian militants of supplying high-powered bombs and financing to Iraqis fighting their troops.” http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/ts_nm/iraq_dc_84

"Muslims should leave America," said Dawood. "We cannot stop our attack just because of the American Muslims; they must realize that American forces are killing innocent Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq; we have the right to respond back, in the same manner, in the enemy's homeland. The American Muslims are like a human shield for our enemy; they must leave New York and Washington."

"I am saying that Muslims must leave America, but we can attack America anytime," he said. "Our cycle of warnings has been completed, now we have fresh edicts from some prominent Muslim scholars to destroy our enemy, this is our defending of Jihad; the enemy has entered in our homes and we have the right to enter in their homes, they are killing us, we will kill them."
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52018

“PARIS - Al-Qaida has for the first time announced a union with an Algerian insurgent group that has designated France as an enemy, saying they will act together against French and American interests. Current and former French officials specializing in terrorism said Thursday that an al-Qaida alliance with the Salafist Group for Call and Combat, known by its French initials GSPC, was cause for concern. "We take these threats very seriously," Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said, adding in an interview on France-2 television that the threat to France was "high" and "permanent," and that "absolute vigilance" was required.

Of the 800 combatants that GSPC was estimated to have had last year, probably no more than 500 remain, and the group has had no operational cells in France since the late 1990s, he said. But Caprioli and others also said an alliance of GSPC and al-Qaida could increase the terror risk for France - not least because al-Zawahri's designation of the country as a worthy target could inspire extremists to take action.”

“KABUL, Afghanistan - Afghanistan could be "taken down" by its booming illegal drug trade, a senior U.S. anti-narcotics official warned Saturday, ahead of the scheduled release of U.N. opium crop data expected to show a massive increase in cultivation this year.

Doug Wankel, director of the U.S. anti-narcotics task force in Afghanistan, warned that the illicit trade in opium and heroin threatened the country's fledgling democracy, instituted after the ouster of the hard-line Taliban regime nearly five years ago by U.S.-led forces.

In 2005, Afghanistan produced an estimated 4,500 tons of opium - enough to make 450 tons of heroi.".

Afghanistan Opium http://rleeermey.org/viewtopic.php?t=9809

If we don't fight with our entire might then we should withdraw, yet I'm for the advancement of free societies and the fight on terror, just feel we need to take out the Iran government if we are to win, but a dirty bomb showing up in a shipping container or transported across the boarder from Mexico through Texas, Arizona, California, etc., is my greatest concern.

How do you fight an enemy that vows to assist the country your trying to protect while that same said country, Iran funds and arms those your fighting within the country your helping?

Arab nations push for condemnation of Israel's nuclear activities - Fri Sep 22, 5:55 PM ET

VIENNA (AFP) - Arab nations have decided to push ahead with submitting a resolution to the UN nuclear watchdog condemning Israel's nuclear activities. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/wl_mideast_afp/iaeanuclearpolitics_060922160402
US going the "extra mile" to help settle nuclear standoff with Iran: envoy

UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - US Ambassador John Bolton said Washington was trying "to go the extra mile" to help the Iran to freeze its sensitive nuclear fuel work. But he warned that "absent a verifiable suspension of Iran's uranium enrichment activities, we are prepared to move to sanctions here in the (Security) Council and to take similar steps to exert economic pressure on Iran outside the council." http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/pl_afp/unirannuclearpolitics_060922200013

Major powers try to narrow gap over Iran sanctions - Fri Sep 22, 4:00 PM ET

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Major powers sought to narrow differences over sanctions against Iran on Friday as a new deadline ticked away for it to agree to suspend sensitive nuclear work.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns said "there are still differences" among the major powers on what sanctions would be imposed if Iran fails to halt uranium enrichment as the U.N. Security Council has demanded.

Senior officials of the United States, France, Russia, China, Britain, Germany and the European Union were meeting on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly, U.S officials said. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060922/ts_nm/un_nuclear_iran_dc_1

Suspending enrichment "unacceptable": Iran cleric - Fri Sep 22, 12:34 PM ET

TEHRAN (Reuters) - An influential Iranian cleric said on Friday that Iran would not halt uranium enrichment work, calling it an unacceptable precondition set by six world powers for talks over the country's atomic activities.

"It (enrichment suspension) is a ridiculous precondition. It is unacceptable," Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani told worshippers at Tehran university, broadcast live on state radio. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060922/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_rafsanjani_dc_1

Iran takes Ramadan moon search to the skies - Fri Sep 22, 9:26 AM ET

TEHRAN (AFP) - Iran will employ an aeroplane to spot the crescent moon that signals the start of Ramadan to ensure there is no dispute over when the Muslim fasting month starts, Iranian media have reported. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/wl_mideast_afp/ramadaniranplane_0

Iran warns of 'lightning' response to any attack - Fri Sep 22, 7:01 AM ET

TEHRAN, Iran (AFP) - Iran has warned Western powers the armed forces would hit back "like lightning" against any attack as it crowed over its military prowess and showed off firepower at a major army parade. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/wl_mideast_afp/irandefencemilitar

U.S. Warns Europe On Iran Investment - LONDON, Sept. 22, 2006

American attempts to persuade Europe to think again about financial involvement in Iran may be starting to bear fruit, according to European banking officials. Whether such "back-door sanctions" will work is far less apparent, experts say. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/22/business/main2033576.shtml

Israelis' main fear is a nuclear Iran: poll - Fri Sep 22, 6:33 AM ET

JERUSALEM (AFP) - Israelis are more worried about the prospect of a nuclear Iran than anything else, including their country's economic situation, according to an opinion poll published ahead of the Jewish New Year. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060922/wl_mideast_afp/mideastisraeliran_

Russia: Iran may return to nuclear talks - Fri Sep 22, 6:16 AM ET

UNITED NATIONS - Russia's foreign minister says there is a reasonable chance that Iran will return to negotiations on its nuclear program, and he cautioned against setting artificial deadlines. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060922/ap_on_re_mi_ea/un_iran_nuclear_1

Thursday, Sept. 21, 2006 5:32 p.m. EDT

Pro-Israel Rally Virtually Ignored at U.N.

The Associated Press, Reuters and many other news organizations reported that a few thousand people took part in a protest against the war in Iraq near the United Nations headquarters on Wednesday. But the mainstream media ignored another, much larger rally taking place outside the U.N., with an estimated 35,000 people expressing their support for Israel and condemning Iranian President Mamoud Ahmadinejad. The main speakers at the rally in Dag Hammerskold Plaza included U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton, who told the cheering, flag-waving crowd that the Bush administration "would not hesitate” to pursue financial sanctions against Iran if it proceeds with its nuclear program. Noble laureate Elie Wiesel chastised the U.N. for ...... http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/21/173546.shtml?s=ic

September 21, 2006

You have been given view points ranging from Destroy Iran's military might to Economic Sanctions and by now you know the cost to our service members and we can become Independent utilizing every source of energy we can muster. Iran has a Jack of Clubs and 4 Aces and the defiance continues unabated with no sight of comprise. President Bush's Administration, our present government for the next two years is bound and determined to stay the course, sacrificing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan in what seems to be nothing more than a pretty big mess, yet I agree we must fight terror but must we fight Civil Wars for those un willing to fight for themselves whole heartedly or should we take care of our own security or both. Presently were very vulnerable to increased attacks against both our infrastructure and cities, i.e. Los Angles, Washington D. C. and New York have been targeted!

Increase shipping container inspections; create a volunteer Civil Air Command for recognizance and surveillance of our boarders, funding fuel/maintenance/deprecation and build a Mexican Guest Program and like wise involve other countries so we can register 10 to 12 million illegal aliens so we can account for them.

Fight this war with all our might or withdraw our troops. Iraq seeks Iran's assistance with security because the Iraq people don't seem to have the resolve to join together to fight the different groups murdering Iraq citizens and coalition forces daily, while the U. S. assumes the brunt of the fight, Russia and China don't seem to support U. S. efforts to enforce Iran to halt their nuclear advancement. The cold War all over again I guess.

So if were not going to stop Iran, then let them rule with Iraq the Middle East, protect Israel and our allies and bring our soldiers home so they can protect the U. S. and originate no fly zones in Southern Lebanon, reaming a constant eye over the Shake-n-Bake NUTS in the Middle East, and from time to time we may have to escort shipments of spent fuel to Russia if it even goes there.

Personally, I feel were fighting a war on three fronts with limited personnel and we need General Macarthur and General Patton at the helm or some help from our Subs and B 52 Bombers. Our Aircraft Carrier force is dwindling to the point the effectiveness of the Navy's air strength fighting in three theaters of operation is questionable due to at least three carriers down for maintenance by the fall until around March 2007, with one under going refueling and George Bush not scheduled to commission until 2008, so without direct support from the Air force, assuming escalation in an all out war with Iran occurs, our subs would have to play a major role.

While we wait, Iran becomes stronger and more countries gather to her side witnessing the U. S. resolve to fight the war on terror but no military action other then operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Unless our government does something soon, within a matter of 6-months or less, Iran will have a reactor on line.

I wish there was another way, but our actions today will dictate the future. Is it to soon to say good buy to our fellow Americans in the three targeted cities announced by the King of terror? You decide!

These cats have the same War tactics as Iran!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v230/CoastieAirdale/Animated%20Gifs/

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v230/CoastieAirdale/Animated%20Gifs/

I hope we can always endure to be compassionate and loving for one another, while it is difficult to understand why so many ruthless people throughout the world know not the love the Almighty speaks of or in his foot steps, our Lord Jesus Christ. I would much rather the world be at peace but as servants to our Lord and God the Father, we are duty bound to up hold the law set down by the Almighty, a struggle of good and evil, right and wrong, that through his mercy we should know our Lord Jesus father, the creator of the universe. When I exclaim the might of Iran’s military must be destroyed, I seek not revenge nor am I uncompassionate to the many that would perish in a war primly consisting of missiles and bombs, yet I must defend the principles set down by our creator and a free society until our Lord Jesus establishes his rule and Kingdom on earth. No one or country ruled by anyone has the right to kill me because of my beliefs or force me to follow there ideological views and while I won't force anyone to believe my views I will fight to keep them.

The Israel Project works to educate the public and the media concerning Israel, but we need your help to make peace and security for Israel a reality. As of September 22, 2006 66,405 concerned citizens from around the world have signed! Help us make a difference. Sign our petition today!

Press Releases http://www.theisraelproject.org/site/c.hsJPK0PIJpH/b.689705/k.9F22/Pre

Sign the petition, if the petition link doesn't link, copy and paste. simple. Over 66,405 signatures so far from all over the world!

http://www.theisraelproject.org/site/c.hsJPK0PIJpH/b.1977861/k.904F/Pl

What to Do About Iranian Nukes September 19, 2006 - Ivan Eland

In June, the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and China offered to provide goodies if Iran ended its nuclear program and threatened economic sanctions if it did not. Negotiations would not start until Iran suspended its enrichment of uranium. Although this was a bold take-it-or-leave-it deal by the six powers, Iran left it.

The Iranians, knowing they have the upper hand against a befuddled Bush administration in several respects, have sporadically and belatedly offered to freeze uranium enrichment, but have refused to do it as a condition for negotiations. But negotiations have been held anyway. At the same time, the United States has pressed Russia and China to fulfill their agreement to impose sanctions if the Iranians balked at the original incentives package. Any sanctions, however, are likely to be weak because both Russia and China have economic interests in Iran. The sanctions being talked about are a ban on exports of nuclear components to Iran and a ban on travel for Iranians working on that country's nuclear program. Iran already has an extensive illicit network in the West for smuggling nuclear components, so a formal ban on Western sales is unlikely to have much of an effect. For security reasons Iran does not allow its nuclear scientists to do much overseas junketing, so the travel ban will be mainly symbolic too.

The only sanctions that would have any real effect on Iran would be in the oil sector. But Russia and China would oppose these vehemently. And so would the nervous Republicans trying to get re-elected in 2006 and 2008 amid already high oil prices. Any petroleum sanctions against Iran, one of the world's largest oil producers, would cause the world price of oil to escalate. In addition, the history of economic sanctions indicates that, over time, loopholes and smuggling eventually greatly diminish their effect. The Iranians know this well because they have been under some form of economic sanctions ever since their revolution alarmed the West in the late 1970s. Thus, Iran is not exactly quaking in its boots over the new threat of Western sanctions. Continued.......
http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,114079,00.html?ESRC=dod-bz.nl

Calculating the Risk of War in Iranby F. William EngdahlJanuary 29, 2006 GlobalResearch.ca
The basic facts


First the basic facts as can be verified. The act by Iran’s President, Ahmadinejad, announcing the resumption of suspended work on completing a nuclear fuel enrichment facility along with two other facilities at Natanz, sounded louder alarm bells outside Iran than his inflammatory anti-Israel rhetoric earlier, understandably so. Mohamed El Baradei, Nobel Peace prize winning head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN body, has said he is not sure if that act implies a nuclear weapons program, or whether Iran is merely determined not to be dependent on outside powers for its own civilian nuclear fuel cycle. But, he added, the evidence for it is stronger than that against Saddam Hussein, a rather strong statement by the usually cautious El Baradei.

The result of the resumption of research at Natanz appears to have jelled for the first time, a coalition between USA and the EU, including Germany and France, with China and even Russia, now joining in urging Iran to desist. Last August President George Bush announced, in regard to Iran’s announced plans to resume enrichment regardless of international opinion, that ‘all options are on the table.’ That implied in context a nuclear strike on Iranian nuclear sites. That statement led to a sharp acceleration of EU diplomatic efforts, led by Britain, Germany and France, the so-called EU-3, to avoid a war. The three told Washington they were opposed to a military solution. Since then we are told by Der Spiegel and others the EU view has changed to appear to come closer to the position of the Bush Administration.

It’s useful briefly to review the technology of nuclear fuel enrichment. To prepare uranium for use in a nuclear reactor, it undergoes the steps of mining and milling, conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication. These four steps make up the 'front end' of the nuclear fuel cycle.

After uranium has been used in a reactor to produce electricity it is known as 'spent fuel,' and may undergo further steps including temporary storage, reprocessing, and recycling before eventual disposal as waste. Collectively these steps are known as the 'back end' of the fuel cycle.

The Natanz facility is part of the ‘front end’ or fuel preparation cycle. Ore is first milled into Uranium Oxide (U³O8), or ‘yellowcake,’ then converted into Uranium Hexaflouride (UF6) gas. The Uranium Hexaflouride then is sent to an enrichment facility, in this case Natanz, to produce a mix containing 3-4% of fissile U235, a non-weapons-grade nuclear fuel. So far, so good more or less in terms of weapons danger.

Iran is especially positioned through geological fortune to possess large quantities of uranium from mines in Yazd Province, permitting Iran to be self-sufficient in fuel and not having to rely on Russian fuel or any other foreign imports for that matter. It also has a facility at Arak which produces heavy water, which is used to moderate a research reactor whose construction began in 2004. That reactor will use uranium dioxide and could enable Iran to produce weapons grade plutonium which some nuclear scientists estimate could produce an amount to build one to two nuclear devices per year. Iran officially claims the plant is for peaceful medical research. The peaceful argument here begins to look thinner.

Nuclear enrichment is no small item. You don’t build such a facility in the backyard or the garage. France’s large Tricastin enrichment facility provides fuel for the nuclear electricity grid of EdF, as well as for the French nuclear weapons program. It needs four large nuclear reactors, just to provide over 3000 MWe power for it. Early US enrichment plants used gaseous diffusion. Enrichment plants in EU and Russia use a more modern centrifuge process that uses far less energy per unit of enrichment. The latter or centrifuge process is also the Iranian type.

To make weapons grade Uranium requires more than conventional civilian electric power grade uranium fuel.

‘Unmaking’ weapons grade uranium today is also a geopolitically interesting process, not irrelevant to the current dispute over Iran. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, under agreements designed to insure that the Soviet nuclear arsenal would be converted to peaceful uses, military weapons uranium came on to the civilian market under a US-Russian agreement.

Today more than half of all the uranium used for electricity in the USA nuclear power plants comes from Russian military stockpiles. Currently 20% of all electricity produced in the US is nuclear generated meaning that Russian uranium fuels some 10% of all US electricity.

In 1994 a $12 billion contract was signed between the US Enrichment Corporation (now USEC Inc) and Russia's Techsnabexport (Tenex) as agents for the US and Russian governments. USEC agreed to buy a minimum of 500 tonnes of weapons-grade uranium over 20 years, at a rate of up to 30 tonnes/year beginning 1999. The uranium is blended down to 4.4% U-235 in Russia. The USEC then sells it to its US power utility customers as fuel. In September 2005 this program reached its halfway point of 250 tonnes or elimination of 10,000 nuclear warheads.

Worldwide, one sixth of the global market of commercial enriched uranium is supplied by Russia from Russian and other weapons-grade uranium stocks. Putin has many cards to play in the showdown over Iran’s nuclear program.

The issue of whether Iran was secretly building a nuclear weapon capability first surfaced from allegations by an Iranian exile opposition group in 2002.

Natanz has been under IAEA agency purview since suspicions about Iran’s activities surfaced. It was prompted by reports from an Iranian opposition organization, National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), and led IAEA head Mohamed El Baradei to tour Iran’s nuclear facilities in February 2002, including the incomplete plant in that city of Natanz about 300 miles south of Tehran. The NCRI is the political arm of the controversial People's Mujahedeen of Iran, which both EU and US governments officially brand terrorist but unofficially work with increasingly against the Teheran theocracy. - Possible Iranian strategy - The Israeli options - The Russian factor in Iran - The China factor in Iran - EU relations with Iran - The Bush Administration role in Iran - AIPAC and Abramoff impact Washington - CONPLAN 8022 - Geopolitical risks of nuclear war - At that point there are several possible outcomes
http://www.irandefence.net/showthread.php?t=1113
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...

__________________

"With its references to just and peaceful rule, and to the restoration of deported peoples and their gods,the Cyrus Cylinder has been seen as the earliest charter of human rights."

Nuclear Testing Images http://www.batguano.com/nuclear/nucgallery.html

http://www.batguano.com/nuclear/12.jpg

Nuclear Weapons History - Mushroom Cloud Picture Gallery - Atmospheric Nuclear Explosion Pictur http://www.zvis.com/nuclear/nukimgs.shtml

Operation Crossroads: Bikini Atoll - This exhibit contains the works of three artist who where there to witness the event http://www.history.navy.mil/ac/bikini/bikini5.htm

Operation Crossroads

During Operation Crossroads from May to July 1946, the fifth Saratoga (CV-3) and fourth Independence (CVL-22), former CV & light cruiser Amsterdam, CL-59, the 22nd aircraft carrier of the United States Navy, accompanied with other war surplus ships of the U. S. Navy were placed at ground zero or a distance away during the atomic bomb tests conducted at Bikini Atoll” (Ref. 618).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Crossroads

“Following Operation Crossroads, the atomic bomb tests conducted at Bikini Atoll, USS Shangri-la (CV-38) made a brief training cruise to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, returning to Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington, remaining during the winter months of 1946” (Ref. 1-Shangri-la & 72).

“The highly radioactive hulk of USS Independence (CVL-22) was later taken to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and San Francisco, Calif. for further test after her final atomic bomb tests during Operation Crossroads at Kwajalein, Bikini Atoll Marshallese: Kuwajleen) is part of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI)” (Ref. 1- Independence & 72).

Destroy Iran’s Might and prevent a depression and save lives, and I don't mean NUKE EM. The fact is, if we don't do something quickly our nation will bankrupt itself. Our dependence on oil, Iran's threat to the world in which were part of last time I checked demands quick action. The government of Iran must go, there military might destroyed by our 41 subs deployed and lets bring our troops home once the insurgents find themselves without funds to rearm. There are a 1,000 reasons to do away with the government of Iran and there mlitary might and then let there 70-million minus a million people spend the next twenty years rebuilding a peaceful society and if they don't, well in 2046 will give em another round. The fact is, that when Iran one day transports spint fuel and sludges to Russia, they will be highjacked, there will be a dirty bomb in the hands of those that want us dead and the world to end.

As I see it a deck has five cards, insurgents backed by Iran used there Jack to open, when they spent 6 years arming, killing, kidnapping solders and launching rockets.

Iran's first Ace appeared when the head of those critters wasn't killed

Second Ace appeared when a Cease Fire commenced without disarming those critters, giving them a chance at there own government spreading hate and discontent.

Third Ace - NUKES - cancel enrichment and prove it and we will go back to two Aces and if they want to keep the first Ace alive, they will have to be peaceful working on the second Ace.

Until the 31st its high stakes poker, and now the 18 September, 2006 and the game continues, because the fourth Ace means Iran wins a prize.............

Bush brands Iran leader a 'tyrant' (Rightfully so, I think) http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060905/pl_afp/usirannuclearpolitics_0609 05185045

*********************************************** Bush brands Iran leader a 'tyrant' Sep 5, 2006 yahoo news, AFP US President George W. Bush branded Iran's president a tyrant and compared leaders in Tehran to Al-Qaeda terrorists who cannot be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. "America will not bow down to tyrants," he said in the second of a series of election-year speeches defending his handling of the war on terrorism and Iraq. "The world's free nations will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon." Bush accused Iran of funding the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah and other groups "to attack Israel and America by proxy" and said Hezbollah was second only to Al-Qaeda in the number of US citizens it has killed. "Like Al-Qaeda and the Sunni extremists, the Iranian regime has clear aims. They want to drive America out of the region, to destroy Israel, and to dominate the broader Middle East," said the US president. But, he said, Shiite extremists have done something Al-Qaeda only dreams of by taking over Iran in 1979, "subjugating its proud people to a regime of tyranny and using that nation's resources to fund the spread of terror and to pursue their radical agenda."

"The Iranian regime and its terrorist proxies have demonstrated their willingness to kill Americans, and now the Iranian regime is pursuing nuclear weapons," said Bush. The US president quoted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as saying, in an August 15 speech, "If you would like to have good relations with the Iranian nation in the future, bow down before the greatness of the Iranian nation and surrender." "If you don't accept to do this, the Iranian nation will force you to surrender and bow down," he quoted the Iranian leader as saying. "America will not bow down to tyrants," he replied. ********************************************** "

Like Al-Qaeda and the Sunni extremists, the Iranian regime has clear aims. They want to drive America out of the region, to destroy Israel, and to dominate the broader Middle East," said the US president.

NOT JUST DRIVE US OUT, BUT DESTROY US, AND TURN US INTO MUSLIMS ! THIS HAS TO BE STOPED !

With Iraq seeking Iran's security help makes me think we need to bring our soldiers home. I guess if you can't stop em over there, you must join them so you can at least have one side stronger then the other in their Civil War.

What are we doing? Iraq is basically back stabbing us or maybe it's not our problem. It could be the biggest bully on the block should rule the bullies in the Middle East. I'm for blowing up Iran’s Nuclear Reactors in route from Russia on Iran's soil before they are installed. If that pisses them off, then their military is next.

Sanctions are a joke. They don't need to transport oil over the high seas to China or Russia and they can sell anything on the Internet, using any form of shipping.

We need to decide once and for all

Are we going to fight the war on terror or not? Because if were not, then bring or soldiers home, strengthen our boarders (300 mile fence verses 2,000-miles is another joke), bunker in and help our allies by providing SUB and B 52 Bomber support and fighters from 9 carriers.

My uncle is pretty cool, running for Mayor of Albany, Oregon.

http://www.lhenion.com

I like talking with him allot. He's open minded, and peaceful. There was a time I too was peaceful in regards to Iran, a country bent on destroying anyone who stands in there way or maybe they will stop at Israel if the U. S. abandonees our brothers and sisters for the better good of the Middle East as the Iran Presidents states.

Maybe it's time to mind our own business and show the world we don't need there oil by once and for all becoming independent and it can be done. A few examples at the end of this Thread and or check out EQNEEDF Renewable Energy Letter or Independence from Middle East Oil.:

Iran Unveils new Fighter Plane TEHRAN,

Iran - Iran unveiled its first locally manufactured fighter plane Wednesday during large-scale military exercises, state-run television reported. The report said the bomber Saegheh is similar to the American F-18 fighter plane, but "more powerful."

It also said the plane was "designed, optimized and improved by Iranian experts." State TV said the Iranian air force had commissioned the Saegheh plane after many test flights in the past year. Television footage showed the airplane taking off and launching two rockets. The plane had a small cockpit and only one pilot. "Saegheh is capable of launching both rockets and bombs," the report said. General Karim Ghavami, commander of Iran's air force, told state-run television that the war games were being held "to show the trans-regional forces that we are ready to defend our country up to the latest drop of our blood."

The Islamic republic is concerned about the U.S. military presence in neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan at a time when the international community has threatened to impose sanctions against Tehran because of its disputed nuclear program. During the war-games, which began Aug. 19 and have been dubbed "The Blow of Zolfaghar," Iran has test-fired short-range, surface-to-surface missiles, submarine-to-surface missiles, a new air defense system and laser bombs.

Iran's military also test-fired a series of missiles during war games in the Persian Gulf in March and April, including a missile it claimed was undetectable by radar and could use multiple warheads to hit several targets simultaneously. After decades of relying on foreign weapons purchases, Iran now says it is increasingly self-sufficient, claiming it annually exports more than $100 million worth of military equipment to more than 50 countries. Since 1992, Iran has produced its own tanks, armored personnel carriers and missiles, the government said. It announced in early 2005 that it had begun producing torpedoes. The government has not said how many warplanes it will build. I give you the Iranian uberplane Recon posted about. http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e57/RanbaRal/1157602191979.jpg

They took an F-5E airframe, sized it up to fit their knock-off of the MiG-29 engine, and added a 2nd tail. Horrible by our standards, but it's probably better than 1/2 the stuff being used by the locals over there anyway. The big threat would be that they build it themselves, so if they had a mind to they could possibly compensate for a difference in abilities with US/Euro fighters by spamming it.

Bush accuses Iran of backing terror, nuclear arms http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060919/pl_nm/un_bush_dc_2

Analysis: Iran defiance has little cost http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_still_defiant_

Defiant Bush assails Iran, Syria at UN http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060919/pl_nm/un_assembly_dc_6

Senator compares Iran's Ahmadinejad to Hitler(What did I tell you!) http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060919/pl_nm/iran_usa_senator_dc_1

Bush slams Iran for wasting wealth on nuclear quest http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060919/pl_nm/un_assembly_dc_7

Bush takes moderate stance on Iran at UN http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/19/news/prexy.php

Chirac offers compromise solution for Iran crisis http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060919/wl_mideast_afp/unirannuclearpolit

US stepping up pressure on Iran outside of UN http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060919/pl_afp/unusirannuclear_060919183446

French leader proposes Iran compromise (Huh?) http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060918/ap_on_re_mi_ea/france_chirac_iran_

In turnaround, US sees two-track approach to Iran nuclear crisis http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060918/pl_afp/unirannuclearpolitics_0609

Bush at UN to push democracy, pressure Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060918/pl_nm/un_assembly_bush_dc_2

Congress researcher says barred from Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060918/pl_nm/iran_usa_conference_dc_1

EU reports progress in Iran nuke talks http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060916/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_2

Ahmadinejad in Havana as NAM backs Iran in nuclear row http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060914/wl_afp/cubanamsummit_060914173455

White House again conditions Iran talks on enrichment halt http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060914/pl_afp/usirannuclearpolitics_0609

US: Fight for sanctions on Iran will be tough, take weeks http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060914/pl_afp/irannuclearpoliticsun_0609

US faults China on germ weapons, Iran, North Korea http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060914/pl_nm/china_usa_iran_nkorea_dc_1

Iran open to "new conditions" over nuclear standoff http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060914/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_233

IAEA: U.S. report on Iran 'dishonest' (Bull!) http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060914/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_us_1

Iran offers security help to Iraqi PM http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/ts_nm/iraq_dc_84

Iraq asks Iran to stop flow of militants http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_iran_6

World powers differing over Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060912/wl_afp/irannuclearpolitics_060912

Iraqi Leader Asks Iran for Help With Security http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/12/world/middleeast/12cnd-iraq.html&OQ=_rQ3D1Q26refQ3Dworld&OP=552a9c48Q2Fm3_5mIoSYdooQ7CsmsTTlmT8mQ7Bsm3odgIm)Q5BIIg__CYQ7CmQ7BsSxIKQ5BdCBQ7EQ51 Q7C)g

6 powers can't agree on Iran statement http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_5

U.S. says there is no Iran suspension offer http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_usa_dc_1

Iran still refusing to halt enrichment http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060912/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_4

Oil deepens losses below $65 on OPEC, Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060912/bs_nm/markets_oil_dc_18

China calls for peaceful Iran resolution http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060909/ap_on_re_mi_ea/china_iran_nuclear_

Iran, EU say nuclear talks were "constructive" http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060909/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_188

Iraq PM to visit Iran as federalism row fans passions http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060909/wl_mideast_afp/iraq_060909185045

EU-Iran nuclear talks to resume Sunday in Vienna http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060909/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

US seeks UN draft resolution on Iran sanctions as early as next week http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/ts_afp/irannuclearpoliticsusun_06

No UN sanctions on Iran as long as talks continue: Solana http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearusuneu_

Iran's Khatami urges talks, not threats http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060908/ap_on_re_us/us_iran_khatami_5

US seeks UN draft resolution on Iran sanctions http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

US Treasury blacklists Iran's Bank Saderat http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/pl_afp/usiranbanking_060908180242

US seeks UN draft resolution on Iran sanctions http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

Washington seeks 'clarification' from EU's Solana on Iran talks http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060908/pl_afp/irannuclearusuneu_060908201533 Iran's

Russia-built atomic plant to start up Sept '07 http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060908/wl_nm/iran_nuclear_dc_1

Germany says Iran can't be allowed to harm U.N. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060906/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_163

French, Americans would back strike on Iran: poll (What?) http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060906/pl_nm/eu_usa_poll_dc_3

Iran says develops 2,000 pound guided bomb http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060906/wl_mideast_afp/iranmilitarybomb_0

Iran abruptly postpones talks with EU http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060906/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_15

Russia says nuclear sanctions could inflame Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060905/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_155

China wants Iran talks despite U.N. deadline expiry (Talk about wussies!) http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060905/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_154

Bush: won't allow a nuclear-armed Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060905/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iran_nuclear_2

Bush steps up war of words with Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060905/pl_afp/usattackspoliticsbush_0609

Iran government asks for 3.5 billion dollars to import petrol(Talk about Blackmail!) http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060905/wl_mideast_afp/iraneconomyenergyo

Iran to meet with EU official over nukes http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060905/ap_on_re_mi_ea/eu_iran_nuclear_7

US cites Iran, Syria as 'worrisome' threats http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060905/ts_alt_afp/usattackspoliticsbush_

Bush brands Iran leader a 'tyrant' (Rightfully so, I think) http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060905/pl_afp/usirannuclearpolitics_0609

Annan Wins On iran Pledge But Warned On Nuclear http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060903/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearlebanon

Annan Questions Iran Holocaust Exhibit http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060903/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_un_holocaust_c

Iran MPs mull blocking UN nuclear inspections http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060903/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

If America Wanted to Talk, Iran Would ... http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/03/weekinreview/03slackman.html?_r=1&ad

Iran Refuses To Budge During Nuclear Standoff ( Anything New?) http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060901/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

U.S. differs with EU on Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060901/wl_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_133

Iran and "the Consequences" http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2006/08/31/DI2

EU: Too early for sanctions against Iran http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060901/ap_on_re_eu/eu_iran_4

Levey: Iran "Central Banker Of Terror" http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060828/ap_on_go_ot/terror_financing_inter

Iran Rejects US Warning As Nuclear Deadline Nears http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060828/pl_afp/irannuclearpolitics_060828

US Seeks Egypt Support On Iran Issue http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060828/pl_afp/irannuclearpoliticsus_0608

Administration Reaffirms Pursuit Of Sanctions On Iran http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-08-28-us-iran_x.htm?csp=3

Iran Tests Submarine To Surface Air Missile Today http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060827/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_missile_3

Iran Atomic Work Will Go On Despite Deadline http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060827/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_74

Iran Plans New Light Water Nuclear Reactor http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060827/ts_afp/irannuclearpoliticstechnol

Iran Determined To Make Nuclear Fuel Despite U.N. Ultimatum http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060827/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

Iran Opens Nuclear Reactor, Defying U.N. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060826/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_77

Saying It's Not A Threat, Iran Opens A Heavy Water Plant http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/27/world/middleeast/27iran.html?ref=wor

Bully Role Won't Help Iran http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/27/world/middleeast/27iran.html?ref=wor

Iran Calls For Talks Over Nuclear Standoff http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060822/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitic

Ambiguous Iran Reply In Nuclear Showdown Could Split The West http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060822/pl_afp/irannuclearpoliticsun_060822195737 Oil

Holds Gains; No Sign Iran Stopping Atomic Work http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060822/bs_nm/markets_oil_dc_17

Iran Offers "New Formula" To Resolve Crisis http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/22/africa/web.0822iranCND.php

Iran Tests Short Range Missiles http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060820/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear_2

Iran Says It Won't Halt Atomic Work http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060820/ts_nm/nuclear_iran_dc_4

Iran Tests 10 Missiles As Excercise Starts http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/20/news/iran.php

Iran Defiant As Deadline Looms http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060820/ts_afp/irannuclearpolitics_060820

Iran test-fired a short-range missile in a demonstration of its "readiness to respond to any threat," state television reported. The upgraged surface-to-surface missile, called Saegheh or lightning in Farsi, has a range of between 80 and 250 kilometers (50 and 155 miles). Massive military exercises began Saturday with the aim of testing new weapons and tactics against a potential enemy.

Twelve army divisions along with air and naval forces and missile units are involved in the military operation, named "Zolfaghar Blow" after the two-point sword of Ali, the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet Mohammed.

"The enemy has gone insane because of the capabilities of Lebanon's Hezbollah," army chief Major General Ataollah Salehi was quoted as saying by official news agency IRNA Saturday, referring to the Shiite group which was locked in a 34-day conflict with Israel under a ceasefire last week. OR.... The package, backed by the five permanent UN Security Council members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany, offers Iran trade, technology and diplomatic incentives if the country agrees to suspend uranium enrichment.

TAKE CARE OF THIS PROBLEM KNOW OR LATER I GUESS THEY will still end up with a dirty bomb. What a drag. The worlds future in Irans hands

Heck Americas for sale, anyway Chinas got a big peace. Our country likes throwing money away, lets buy those Russia Reactors their selling to Iran. On second thought, wouldn't it be cheaper to just wait tell they trasport it and either highjack it or blow it up. Maybe we can let Iran have world inspectors observe the transit of the spent fule and the sludges from the metals they will one day use developing space age products and the like. We got a lot of problems. Those there critters only know tuff love I'm afraid to say.

These guys ain't got no guns

The group of six say they will hold off on any action until after an August 31 report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), that will judge whether Iran has halted enrichment-related activity or not.

Big mistake - once the door opens, light gets heavy, advancement, larger plants, etc. spint fuel is spint fuel, light or heavy, its highly containmated waste .

World powers have offered Iran light water reactors and a guaranteed supply of nuclear fuel in return for a halt to its sensitive enrichment and reprocessing activities. But Iran says as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) it has a right to nuclear enrichment and to produce its own fuel. The heavy water reactor's plutonium by-product can be used for making atomic warheads but Iran insists its nuclear programme is purely peaceful and aimed only at generating energy. Unlike light water plants, heavy water reactors do not need enriched uranium fuel in order to function. But even in a light water electricity plant the uranium need only be enriched to 3.5-5 percent, well short of the level needed to produce a nuclear bomb.

Another target I guess:

Iran's first nuclear power plant is currently under construction with Russian help in the south and it is expected to be operational by the end of 2007.

The million dollar question. Will Russia Back there play. The Russia guy on tv said "We can sell weapons to anyone we want just like the US does" and when asked, Will we be at war with Russia one day, "No"

That shows you we could buy them off. Think about it, it would have been cheaper if we bougth that 3.6 billion 53 helicoper pacakage in stead of our south america enemy. Buy the Russians off and Destroy the threat.

MILITARY TARGETS AS I SEE IT:

The international concerns about Iran’s nuclear weapons program has largely arisen from Jafarzadeh’s stunning revelations about 7 major previously secret nuclear sites, including the sites in Natanz, Arak, Karaj, Ab-Ali, and Tehran. Jafarzadeh revealed the existence of Natanz uranium enrichment facility, and Arak's heavy water facility in August 2002, Ab-Ali centrifuge testing facility near Tehran in February 2003, two additional nuclear sites near Karaj in May 2003, and two other new nuclear sites in Kolahdouz military complex in Tehran, and Ardekan in July 2003.

He unveiled the details of Iran’s development of bio-weapons in May 2003, and had previously provided valuable information about the Shahab-3 medium range missile. On April 27, 2004, Jafarzadeh revealed information that Iran, using some 400 nuclear experts, is now running a secret nuclear weapons program supervised by the military and the Supreme Leader parallel to their overt nuclear energy program.

Jafarzadeh had previously unveiled in March, a secret meeting held earlier by Iran’s senior officials where they decided to speed up their nuclear weapons program, while faking cooperation with the IAEA.

March 24, 2005, Jafarzadeh revealed that Iran has actually built a secret underground facility in Tehran’s Parchin military complex where activities related to laser enrichment is carried out. Biography: Alireza Jafarzadeh http://spcwashington.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&

Alireza Jafarzadeh is the president of Strategic Policy Consulting, Inc. He is also a FOX News Channel Foreign Affairs Analyst. Iran's first nuclear power plant is currently under construction with Russian help in the south and it is expected to be operational by the end of 2007.
IF YOU NEED DIRECTIONS THEN BUY ONE OF THESE: GARMIN GPS IRAN Products http://gpsworldsupply.com/gps_world_supply.php?step=category&catNum=12

While you are reading this, the Iranian reactor produces enriched bomb-grade uranium. Terrorists can deliver that bomb to your city, and it can kill you and your children. Yet the government does nothing.

Do we demand violence? Not in any common sense. Similarly, police use force to arrest criminals in order to stop violence. But Iran is not a criminal? Wrong. Iran has proven malicious intent. Iran, under the current regime, conducted many terrorist bombings in the West, and sponsors deadly terrorists. Iranian leaders repeatedly called for fight against the United States and annihilation of Israel.

Perhaps Iran needs nuclear weapons for self-defense? No. Iran already bullies the Middle East with its huge conventional army. No country threatens Iran. Since the eighth-century jihad and the Ottoman army at the gates of Vienna, the West has never been exposed to such threat. Iran’s several nuclear bombs can inflict more damage on America than the World War II. Never before the Islamic fundamentalists who hate the West and dream of attacking it had military might of apocalyptic dimensions.

Are you crazy to doubt they will use the bomb? We call on the United States: Do not hesitate. Protect your people. Protect your allies. Destroy the Iranian reactor! To sign the petition, visit http://terrorismisrael.com/nuclear_iran.htm

Two of Iraq's Shiite Parties Denounce Iran Allegations Reveal Divisions Within Sect Usually Aligned With Powerful Neighbor By Amit R. Paley and Saad al-Izzi Washington Post Foreign Service Saturday, August 19, 2006; Page A11 BAGHDAD, Aug. 18 --

Two Shiite Muslim parties on Friday accused Iran of instigating violence in Iraq and attempting to destabilize the country, exposing a growing rift within Iraq's largest sect that many fear will exacerbate the nation's slide into full-scale civil war.

Iran Stages Massive War Games Military Exercises To Go With Country's New Defensive Doctrine TEHRAN, Iran, Aug. 19, 2006 Iranian military forces alight from a helicopter during a training exercise in Zahedan, in the southeastern province of Sistan va Baluchistan, Iran, on Saturday Aug. 19, 2006.Iranian military forces alight from a helicopter during a training exercise in Zahedan, in the southeastern province of Sistan va Baluchistan, Iran, on Saturday Aug. 19, 2006. (AP/ISNA) (AP) Iran on Saturday launched a series of large-scale military exercises aimed at introducing the country's new defensive doctrine, state-run television reported.

Egypt warns against any military strike on Iran Sat Aug 19, 6:32 AM ET CAIRO (Reuters) - Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak warned against any military strike on Iran in an interview published on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT The United Nations Security Council has demanded Iran suspend uranium enrichment by the end of the month after Tehran failed to persuade the international community its atomic scientists were working on power stations, not bombs. Washington has declined to rule out military strikes as a solution to the nuclear dispute.

"The conflict between the United States and Iran must be resolved through diplomatic channels and direct dialogue, because any strike on Iran means the end of stability in the region and the world," Mubarak said in an interview published on Saturday in Egypt's Akhbar al-Youm newspaper.

Iran has set itself an August 22 deadline to respond to an offer of economic incentives designed to persuade it to comply with the suspension demand. Egypt has not had full diplomatic relations with Tehran in more than 25 years and high-level contacts are rare, usually limited to international meetings.

But Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki came to Egypt last week for talks with Mubarak on the conflict in Lebanon and other regional issues. In April, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit received a telephone call from Mottaki on the nuclear issue, and the ministers agreed to stay in touch.

"Iran is an important country in the region, and relations between countries are governed by pacts and treaties and agreements that prohibit interference in any internal matters of the countries," Mubarak said in the interview. Egypt, one of 35 countries on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency, says it is against any nuclear weapons in the Middle East, but wants the dispute resolved peacefully.

Relations between Egypt and Iran were severed when Cairo gave refuge to the deposed Shah of Iran, who died in Egypt. Over the years, the Egyptian government has repeatedly accused Iran of supporting underground Islamist groups.

Independence from Middle East Oil through expanded Renewable Energy Technologies

Maybe it’s time to start setting the example to Iran by illuminating the fact, that as a nation of “We The People, By The People”, that we ourselves don’t need to construct new Nuclear Energy Power Plants, replacing 30-year old Plants with PV Arrays, Trough Solar Systems, Solar Towers/Thermal Solar Powers, Dish/Engine Concentrating Solar Power Systems, Thermal Solar Collectors for your House and other Renewable Energy Technologies just waiting to expand exploitation, to include Ocean Geo Thermal to Wind Generation to Hydrogen Fuel Cells etc. There is absolutely no need for further Nuclear Energy Power Plants any where in the world yet many Nuclear Power Plants are on the drawing board in various countries presently using Nuclear Energy.

With only one out of ten shipping containers actually searched entering the U. S. and our boarders insecure between Mexico, Canada and the U. S., it’s inevitable that a Dirty Bomb, Chemical or Biological weapon of mass destruction will end up on our sovereign soil. A 50 gallon drum of MTBE dropped in one of our Lakes or reservoirs will not be environmentally sound. Yet MTBE is still used in gasoline.

The Iran President doesn’t want to destroy Jerusalem, as there are holy places sacred to all Muslims, just the Jewish people, so when he says a Nuclear Bomb is old technology, you better believe it and once those shipments to Russia of thermally hot and highly radioactive pollutants involved in nuclear energy from spent uranium fuel or reprocess this fuel and or sludge's originated as a result of the manufacturing of specialty metals and chemicals, used in energy production, chemical and mineral processing, aerospace, medical, research and consumer products are high jacked or for that matter, if Iran prevails and begins Uranium enrichment, soon after they will have their Dirty Bomb ingredients, Nuclear Fuel, etc. yet as a nation were some what divided on what to do. It is clear to me, that if Iraq under Saddam with Uranium enrichment and Nuclear Fuel, nuclear energy was a threat, even though none was found, surely another tyrant with the goals of his and his followers in mind need not be allowed access to technologies allowing for Uranium enrichment and Nuclear Fuel.

While we here at home suggest that our President should have open discussions with Iran’s President, I would ask to what end? The Iran’s President has made his case pretty clear. He’s upset Israel exist and England and the U. S. is his chief focus as he sees us as aggressors determined to establish democracy in the Middle East and from the beginning until now, without the support of England and the U. S. in his view, the State of Israel could not have evolved into the Country it is now. Amazingly Germany has agreed to provide more Nuclear Submarines to Israel, yet Iran only shouts “Death to Israel, Death to America”, while France was recently reunited with terrorism and the world stands by in total disregard for overall world safety as if countries in various regions are setting idle, waiting to see the resolve of the U. S. weaken, hoping diversity within our own democratic system will challenge our present Administration’s policies; which by the way will happen if we don’t fight the war on terror with all our might like Iran is willing to do for their holly crusade.

I have struggled with the notion of appeasement and it is beyond me why our country would even consider working with Iran’s Nuclear Energy Programs provided they allow for International Atomic Energy Agency Inspectors to make random inspections and transport the spent fuel to Russia.

If we can build a 64 Megawatt PV Array, then so can Iran, so why do they need Nuclear Energy Power Plants to generate electricity? They have allot of sun, deserts and wind, although they do have pretty tough san storms, so they might have to design a cover for the system to be placed on tracks that can slide over the PV Array, powered by engines above the wheels, the cover like a long train setting idle on another set of tracks until needed, entering through a removal section.

Technologies are awaiting exploitation, but we must marry ourselves to a better and brighter future through the use of available Renewable Energy Technologies, alternate methods of exploiting non renewable fossil fuels and better improved devices and products requiring less energy to run such as LED lighting and the like rather then florescent.

If were to continue relying on oil as a bases for our energy requirements domestically, then pollutants in our atmosphere will continue to increase and our reliance on Middle Eat Oil will find our nation continually embroiled in the affairs of other nations or seeking to exploit every drop of oil within the United States Of America. Alaska up for grabs I guess. With underwater thermal activity discovered under the Ice Caps and in the deep Atlantic, and many other areas of oceans and seas throughout the world, the Cascade Subduction Zone, Pacific Ring of Fire, Volcanic activity, recent devastating earthquakes and Tsunamis, it’s time to rethink exploitation of oil in areas that are sensitive for various reasons. With these worrisome events lurking in the future, we must now, like generations before contemplate a nuclear threat.

I'm an environmentalist but I'm practical, we need alternate energy souses and for the last 25 years I've been stating it and I don't care if animals must be relocated or learn to live around technologies which there presently doing just fine. We must change the way we exploit our resources and always remember that the processes in which we use to make anything creates pollutants, so we should at least be balanced, utilizing every energy source we can to become independent, eventually replacing oil with Solar, etc. for domestic energy. I would much rather breath clean air and shut down oil fueled Power Generation Facilities with Solar, maintaining nucler energy at the level today with new plants or replace then with Solar, etc., keeping nuclear energy for our Naval Ships, Subs, etc., but something must give and Solar PV Array's etc. don't create radioactive waste. End the end future generations will bear the brunt of our actions today.

Maybe it's time to mind our own business and show the world we don't need there oil by once and for all becoming independent and it can be done. This Thread will over a course of time expand so keep tuned in:

The Weather Makers: The History and Future Impact of Climate Change http://www.theweathermakers.com/

SOLAR ENERGY

How many acres would it take if 400 areas = 64 megawatts broken down by industry, i.e., coal, nuclear, oil plus solar cell contribution, moderate windmill, etc. The total US capacity is 9971 megawatts divided by 64 = 155.80 x 400 acres = 62,320 acres. Without knowing all energy production by source or fuel, the exact acres necessary utilizing PV array Renewable Energy Technologies is unknown, but it makes you stop and think for a minute.

The largest PV array in the world - 400-acres = 64 megawatts

Morning Edition, August 30, 2006 · When the price of oil is high, talk turns to alternative forms of energy, including wind, biofuels and solar. One kind of solar energy isn't getting much publicity. But solar thermal power is quietly becoming a significant source of electricity in the Southwest.

In the desert south of Las Vegas, crews working on a project called Nevada Solar One are assembling a parabolic trough of curved mirrors connected in a huge array.

At the center, a closed-loop tube will be filled with oil that will be heated by the sun. The hot oil will flow around the 400-acre project and into a building